Rumor: Intel to delay releasing Ivy Bridge

[stargazr]

xbitlabs.com posted slide from Chinese website that desktop CPU's would be delayed until March or April 2012 instead of early Q1 2012.

They said Intel refused to comment on "rumors, speculation, or nebulous reports ".

I'm not surprised in light of the Sandy Bridge fiasco.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/di...t_Generation_Ivy_Bridge_Processors_Slide.html

 

[Phynaz]

the company’s documents said that the Ivy Bridge are scheduled to be available in Q1 2011, which typically means January or February.

Holy crap, Intel is a year late!

 

[stargazr]

The second chart on the right would be the three chipsets they plan on releasing first in Q2 2012.

 

[Idontcare]

I'm not surprised in light of the Sandy Bridge fiasco.

Pretty sure this thread is a repost, but this statement catches me by surprise.

The "Sandy Bridge fiasco" was a chipset (mobo) issue, had nothing to do with Sandy Bridge itself.

And since Ivy Bridge is platform compatible and won't require any new chipsets, there is hardly any reason to delay IB based on the chipset issue that beleaguered Sandy Bridge's release.

 

[stargazr]

Pretty sure this thread is a repost, but this statement catches me by surprise.

The "Sandy Bridge fiasco" was a chipset (mobo) issue, had nothing to do with Sandy Bridge itself.

And since Ivy Bridge is platform compatible and won't require any new chipsets, there is hardly any reason to delay IB based on the chipset issue that beleaguered Sandy Bridge's release.

Yeah, I'm just suggesting it could have put them behind as a company but you're right. That part has been debated before.

 

[bryanW1995]

Pretty sure this thread is a repost, but this statement catches me by surprise.

The "Sandy Bridge fiasco" was a chipset (mobo) issue, had nothing to do with Sandy Bridge itself.

And since Ivy Bridge is platform compatible and won't require any new chipsets, there is hardly any reason to delay IB based on the chipset issue that beleaguered Sandy Bridge's release.

I agree. Much more likely is that intel now has better info on BD and knows that they can combat it with SB and/or SB-E, so they now think that they have time to iron out all the wrinkles to get a solid launch.

 

[skipsneeky2]

Think i saw a post about the amd bulldozer being delayed too.

 

[Puppies04]

I agree. Much more likely is that intel now has better info on BD and knows that they can combat it with SB and/or SB-E, so they now think that they have time to iron out all the wrinkles to get a solid launch.

This. But i would be inclined to think that intel don't think BD pushes SB as much as some people were hoping and are putting IB back to allow SB to stay on the market a bit longer and make more profit. In essence why release IB if SB is still the top dog at that price point. Of course this is all speculation on top of speculation, just my 2 cents.

 

[Tuna-Fish]

Think i saw a post about the amd bulldozer being delayed too.

That was just a rumor based on misinterpreting the later model numbers.

AMD stated that: "nothing has changed, and desktop BD will be available early summer, server in late summer."

 

[jimbo75]

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=31661888&postcount=143:whiste:

 

[Arkadrel]

Thats good news for Bulldozer, if it happends to be faster than Sandy Bidge, it ll have a longer time on top before Ivy Bridge knocks it down again.

 

[Nemesis 1]

That was just a rumor based on misinterpreting the later model numbers.

AMD stated that: "nothing has changed, and desktop BD will be available early summer, server in late summer."

So it was a rumor. Can anyone link a date that BD is sippose to be released . I mean 2011 is 12 months. What DATE has been given BY AMD link to AMD .

As for Intel X-Bit shows a fake slide that did not come from Intel . If Intel released that slide than they would say so . Its also strange that SB-E is a 4th qt 2011 release. IB-E will be released in the 2nd QT. Not likely . As that graph shows all IB being released at same time . Not likely.

So rumors are False flags . ATs last article still has IB released early 2012. As for the Motherboards . Socket 1155 works withSB/ IB . Socket 2011 will work with SB-E/IB-E

How many 2011 socket M/Bs we going to see next weak ? So The chipset thing won't hold IB release for socket 1155 at all . As for IB-E I wouldn't expect it until 4th QT 2012. Followed by 22nm Atoms. I say we see socket 1155 in 1st. Qt. I am willing to bet against the AMD anti Intel rumors. Time to go play with photo shop and make some false AMD graphs

 

[Idontcare]

So it was a rumor. Can anyone link a date that BD is sippose to be released . I mean 2011 is 12 months. What DATE has been given BY AMD link to AMD .

Quityerbitchen

Seriously though I had nothing else to segue into my showing you this:

Source: Solid State Technology

and

Source: Solid State Technology

 

[OCGuy]

We are lucky SB was even released.....Intel has only been topping itself since Conroe.....no competition at all.

 

[jimbo75]

We are lucky SB was even released.....Intel has only been topping itself since Conroe.....no competition at all.

Yeah that's why their graphics are the equivalent of a 7 year old 6800GT.

 

[Nemesis 1]

Yeah that's why their graphics are the equivalent of a 7 year old 6800GT.

Jimmy Jimmy were talking CPUs here not weak ass APUs or even weaker IGPs . AMD can have all the people they can spouting the merits of APU . Guess what Its just a stronger weakling than intels IGP . As for DX11 It will be a while befor the AGu does any real desktop work . Intels IGP is Good enough . AMDs is a better, but both still suck . AMD will not make alot of money on these APUs. The margins just aren't there.

 

[OCGuy]

Yeah that's why their graphics are the equivalent of a 7 year old 6800GT.

Indeed they are....and they still have the vast majority of graphics marketshare, and most likely will for quite some time. That doesn't bode well for competition.


Then again, I don't turn the Intel for graphics, so it doesn't really concern me either way.

 

[skipsneeky2]

We are lucky SB was even released.....Intel has only been topping itself since Conroe.....no competition at all.

Lets hope bulldozer is the answer just maybe that $1,000 990x intel is offering will drop in price:thumbsup:

One could only hope anyways

 

[jimbo75]

Seriously if intel was so far ahead that their engineers can afford to go on holiday all year, don't you think they'd maybe be better off spending their time so they might have some kind of presence in smartphones or at least not losing the netbook market completely?

Keep pretending it's because they have nothing better to do. Just don't forget Larrabee and the SB chipset failure, and now IB at least 3 months late. The Ivory Tower is falling to pieces.

 

[Nemesis 1]

Seriously if intel was so far ahead that their engineers can afford to go on holiday all year, don't you think they'd maybe be better off spending their time so they might have some kind of presence in smartphones or at least not losing the netbook market completely?

Keep pretending it's because they have nothing better to do. Just don't forget Larrabee and the SB chipset failure, and now IB at least 3 months late. The Ivory Tower is falling to pieces.

You really don't get it do ya? Atom at 32nm might make it into a smartphone . But at 22nm it will be in smart phones and it will be a killer to hold off ARM . NV is going 4 arm cores and tigera3 . You think that ARM is going to sip power as it becomes more capable . Arm is scaling up power intel is scaling down power the 28nm Arm Vs. 22nm. Atom is shaping up to be one of the most important cpus Intel has ever done . Going by intels past I think they can pull it off. What larrabee failure . Nights ferry is in the hands of developers right now . Nights corner will be released at 22nm . Unless intel has a break threw with haswell . SB chipset thing wasn't that big of deal . Intel got it resolved quick unlike NV bumpgate that NV blamed on everyone but themselves. You know not many Intel fanbois had alot to say about PH1 . They could have said a lot more .

I still waiting for a link to AMDs offical timeline for BD release. Whats up none have one or none want to see the offical timeline.

The thing I loved about the SB chipset thing . So many SAID they used the sata2 ports . To me thats just dumb. Sata 3 ports had no problems . How many here run more than 2 HDDs? So alot of it was about nothing sata3 ports were fine . Just the people ass. their PCs either lied or didn't use the preferred sata3 ports .

 

[PreferLinux]

Thats good news for Bulldozer, if it happends to be faster than Sandy Bidge, it ll have a longer time on top before Ivy Bridge knocks it down again.

No, it's not. SB-E is still on schedule, and it is almost certain to beat BD.

I think it is a fake too. The colors are off, the quality is disgusting, only part of the slides are shown, and there is no > i5 2500K at the same time as the > i7 2600K.

 

[jimbo75]

You really don't get it do ya? Atom at 32nm might make it into a smartphone . But at 22nm it will be in smart phones and it will be a killer to hold off ARM. NV is going 4 arm cores and tigera3 . You think that ARM is going to sip power as it becomes more capable . Arm is scaling up power intel is scaling down power the 28nm Arm Vs. 22nm. Atom is shaping up to be one of the most important cpus Intel has ever done . Going by intels past I think they can pull it off. What larrabee failure . Nights ferry is in the hands of developers right now . Nights corner will be released at 22nm . Unless intel has a break threw with haswell . SB chipset thing wasn't that big of deal . Intel got it resolved quick unlike NV bumpgate that NV blamed on everyone but themselves. You know not many Intel fanbois had alot to say about PH1 . They could have said a lot more .

Yes yes "Jam tomorrow" we've heard it all before.

The thing I loved about the SB chipset thing . So many SAID they used the sata2 ports . To me thats just dumb. Sata 3 ports had no problems . How many here run more than 2 HDDs? So alot of it was about nothing sata3 ports were fine . Just the people ass. their PCs either lied or didn't use the preferred sata3 ports .

Lol sure, the recall never happened either!

 

[skipsneeky2]

Who is not to say the first generation sb motherboards could have more then one flaw?

Was a pretty big recall over some sata ports.

Perhaps a way to scare people into buying sata 3 based hard drives and ssd drives?

Now the recall is history and the problem apparently has been fixed thank god for that.

 

[Nemesis 1]

Yes yes "Jam tomorrow" we've heard it all before.




Lol sure, the recall never happened either!

None said it didn't happen But people such as yourself need ammo . Intel supplied that Ammo to such people as yourself with the sata 2 ports. Still that doesn't change the fact that all these people used more than 2 hdds and didn't use sata3 ports . Great bunch of retards they were.

Your transparent and we can see your panties are in a bind.

 

[sangyup81]

Intel is giving AMD a head start so it can catch up