tential said:
And has zero issues with the Nvidia slide which has 0 information on how they calculated their performance gain, is proven to be completely false and is perfectly ok with that.
Yet, AMD's slide which has, for all we know so far, isn't false, and has all information there to show their reference point of their calculation, and he wants to complain that THAT slide is misleading.
It's obnoxious. He made a claim, was proven false, and then still continues on this silly crusade. Get over it, you made a mistake, stop playing the victim and crying about being "unpopular". It's as hypocritical as it gets.
I started the discussion with this:
Anybody else notice the "shady" wording of their performance increase claim? It says "19% more performance since launch". For me that reads like the driver only add a few more % on the already existing performance enhancements of older drivers.
At no point there did I even bring nvidia into the game. I simply noticed that I think the marketing slide can be misleading because the big 19% talks about overall performance increase of the R9 290/x since launch and not actually the performance increases the Omega drivers will bring.
That statement was met with:
I don't think a driver will magically increase the performance by 75%. Hawai is reallyclose to leave a place to its successor. But look at all the features it is suppose to come with. I also heard about MANY bugs repairs.
We will have to wait for the release notes to learn more about it.
Which is fine and I responded with:
Oh no worries. I'm happy as well! I just recently switched to two R9 290X watercooled. Couldn't resist with these prices, upcoming Freesync (I'm up for a 4K display) and Civilization Beyond Earth using Mantle. It's just that people might be thinking this is new omega driver is similar to the nVidia driver that actually increased performance a lot, while the wording of the chart actually suggest they are looking at a 19% increase from all driver since the launch of the cards together.
I emphasized what my train of thought was at the moment. I was met with several posts asking what driver I was talking about:
could you post benchmarks of the magical nvidia driver that gave for example me a big boost in fps? this magical driver doesnt exist...
To which I responded:
Huh? Everybody forgot the 337.50 driver earlier this year?
I was then met with a discussion about this driver being full of marketing BS, which is fine but didn't really get onto the topic I had with the slide. Besides there were two cherry picked examples from Anandtech which proved that for Bioshock Infinite is was only a driver optimization and for Rome Total War II a SLI profile.
There are several benchmarks out that clearly show an increase in performance like
here,
here and
here.
No I completely agree that the drivers was not wondrous at all. Some increase here and there, but it really doesn't give justice to the marketing slide nvidia produced. I even said so on two posts:
Well there are games that gain 10% and even more. Of course it is completely dependent on the game. Such will probably be the case with the AMD Omega driver. This is all I'm saying. Not sure why I am being put in a corner right now. I just don't think anybody should get too excited.
Besides nobody really answered my first question to begin with: how do you interpret/feel about that marketing slide?
And:
Yeah I got it: the nvidia driver was not the next best thing since sliced bread. Nonetheless it did boost performance on a number of titles. Was the marketing bad? Yeah! But so is this one from AMD. Personally I think it is even worse, because with the nvidia driver I actually did see increased performance. Perhaps not to the levels nvidia advertised, but still. All I can gather from the AMD slides is that since the launch like over a year ago they managed to get 19% more performance out of their cards in Bioshock Infinite. It has actually no relevance to the Omega driver when you really think about it.
I totally got it at that point. I was dragged into a discussion about the nvidia driver that I really didn't want to have. Yes both companies have bad marketing and I acknowledged that in my posts several times! I can still call out AMD in the respective Thread about their new driver for it, which is the discussion I started. For some the wording is very clear, but I believe it is not clear to all. But your mileage might vary.
Well I leave it at that. I'm looking forward to what ever bug fixes and performance increases I can get out of the driver. So cheers. I didn't mean to offend anybody