Ron Paul pulls into second in Iowa

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Yes! So let's define what an "American" looks like. Let's take a journey through another person's mind and imagine that *maybe* they might think differently than you and I (crazy, I know).. but, just maybe they might be using a definition of a *term* that is different than you and I.. and, just maybe, their definition might make more sense if we think more objectively and "out of the box".. i.e. how a TSA agents' look might define his nationalization - but that would need to be further defined by how the TSA defines the image of an "American".

You can just reply with a "Wow".

Hahahahaha, omg... You can't be serious. There is a long history over that type of statement. Damn. wtf, centuries of racism and bigotry vanishing... a;lsdkjf;alksdjf

I can't even read anything in your post. What does each word even mean?!
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Forget about Ron Paul for a minute - what does an "American" look like?

That's the entire point. Why does Ron Paul feel like so many Americans dont' look American? What does he mean by that?

You see, I agree with you, what does 'American' look like? I think it encompasses all races. Ron Paul apparently does not.

Again, can you think of any context where his statement would be appropriate? I cannot.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
2 clowns come is spouting nothing they can actually prove Paul said or did and you can't figure it out . You show us a video of such a thing with his face and mouth moving , There are well over 100,000 videos on paul on utude . Some like you 2 guys. But they can only say what paul is refuted as saying with NO real proof . Its like obama swiming in the gulf with his daughter . No real proof it ever happened . Just a liar saying it happened. I will get some that defend your stance

The proof is in his own newsletters, which he subsequently defended.

Ron Paul belongs with the likes of George Wallace and other horribly racist politicians. He's a relic of the past who hides his horribly racist platform under lies of 'civil liberty' and a somewhat decent foreign policy when you ignore the really crazy stuff like about wanting to have state sponsored pirates, weird conspiracy theories, and that kind of stuff.
 

smokeyjoe

Senior member
Dec 13, 1999
265
1
81
That's the entire point. Why does Ron Paul feel like so many Americans dont' look American? What does he mean by that?

You see, I agree with you, what does 'American' look like? I think it encompasses all races. Ron Paul apparently does not.

Again, can you think of any context where his statement would be appropriate? I cannot.

Well, thanks for asking a pointed question.. and it's a good question, but is what he said racist??

I'd really like to see the video (or transcript) that led to the response. Because that would give a better context and make a world of difference, in my opinion. Such things like intonation can make a difference as well. Interviews/political shows are misconstrued too readily nowadays..

I just don't think that this specific article is tantamount evidence that RP is a "racist".. I'm still looking at these newsletters, but it's a long shot imo so far..
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Well, thanks for asking a pointed question.. and it's a good question, but is what he said racist??

I'd really like to see the video (or transcript) that led to the response. Because that would give a better context and make a world of difference, in my opinion. Such things like intonation can make a difference as well. Interviews/political shows are misconstrued too readily nowadays..

I just don't think that this specific article is tantamount evidence that RP is a "racist".. I'm still looking at these newsletters, but it's a long shot imo so far..

What kind of context could make his statement appropriate?

It's really the sum total of Paul's history that makes a likely racist. At some point when you get a repeated history of being connected to such vile racist filth, it's pretty likely that you're a racist. I mean the man had his own newsletter full of racism, then he defended his newsletter, the TSA statement, etc. It's just too much. I could maybe understand your point if he had no history of racism and just had that TSA statement, he's an old man from a very racist time, but maybe he changed or whatever, but it's just a history full of horrible racism that it's almost certain that he is a cranky old racist who thinks that non-whites are not American looking.

I can't wait until he leaves politics forever. Shouldn't be too long now. He needs to get the hell out of the spotlight and stop trying to spread his hatred. It really is a shame that a lot of young people have been tricked into following him because they think that he actually supports civil rights and liberties.
 
Last edited:

smokeyjoe

Senior member
Dec 13, 1999
265
1
81
What kind of context could make his statement appropriate?
“We quadrupled the TSA, you know, and hired more people who look more suspicious to me than most Americans who are getting checked,” he says. “Most of them are, well, you know, they just don’t look very American to me. If I’d have been looking, they look suspicious … I mean, a lot of them can’t even speak English, hardly. Not that I’m accusing them of anything, but it’s sort of ironic.”
http://www.salon.com/2007/06/02/ron_paul_6/
.

Ok.. it's getting really late by me.. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that in his statement, RP could possibly be projecting the viewpoint of what a TSA agent would categorize as "suspicious" ("If I’d have been looking, they look suspicious").. and the TSA agents definition of a "suspicious individual" might actually include an Arab or Middle Eastern looking individual (God/Allah forbid).

I mean, a lot of them can’t even speak English, hardly. Not that I’m accusing them of anything, but it’s sort of ironic.”
http://www.salon.com/2007/06/02/ron_paul_6/
Ironic that an "unAmerican looking individual" (in MY terms) might find someone "unAmerican" looking (in whatever terms).

Yea, you'll probably you'll read this and disregard it as nonsense. I've had a few glasses of wine so the quotes are out of whack I'm sure..
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Ok.. it's getting really late by me.. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that in his statement, RP could possibly be projecting the viewpoint of what a TSA agent would categorize as "suspicious" ("If I’d have been looking, they look suspicious").. and the TSA agents definition of a "suspicious individual" might actually include an Arab or Middle Eastern looking individual (God/Allah forbid).

Ron Paul was talking about TSA agents, not what TSA agents are looking for. He said that TSA agents don't look American, which is ironic to him. Your explanation makes no sense as to what he said or at the very least doesn't make Paul's statement appropriate.

His statements don't make any sense as to someone projecting a viewpoint of what a TSA would categorize as suspicious since he was talking about the TSA agents themselves.

Ironic that an "unAmerican looking individual" (in MY terms) might find someone "unAmerican" looking (in whatever terms).

Yea, you'll probably you'll read this and disregard it as nonsense. I've had a few glasses of wine so the quotes are out of whack I'm sure..

I don't think that you're thinking very clearly...but regardless, a lot of Ron Paul fans refuse to acknowledge his very extensive racist history, so whatever, we'll have to agree to disagree. I think that a guy who released a racist newsletter for years, then defended the newsletter, then said that Americans who work for an American governmental agency in America don't look American to him, and so forth is a racist. Ron Paul fans can think that's perfectly normal. Most of them have already been tricked by Ron Paul into thinking that he's actually for individual rights and liberties, so it's only fitting that the same people have also been tricked into thinking that Ron Paul isn't a racist.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
I am thinking clearly and you have shown nothing that supports your views . I need to see Paul say something racist rather than WHAT YOU THINK . SHOW PROOF POSITIVE . I didn't know you read body language . Why is such a talented person wasting time at these forums .
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
He's quite horrible at defending himself. Very unconvincing, twitching around at his sordid past being investigated and questioned.

So you have nothing to say about the 2nd 3rd and 4th links . Why doesn't that surprize Me?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0

Not all of those links are of Ron Paul defending himself, they're of other people.

Look, it's nice that you think that it's perfectly normal to release a racist newsletter under your name, then defend those racist newsletters, then make racist statements about people who you think don't look American despite the fact that they are American. Most people would say that this is a pattern of racism.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Last edited:

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Not all of those links are of Ron Paul defending himself, they're of other people.

Look, it's nice that you think that it's perfectly normal to release a racist newsletter under your name, then defend those racist newsletters, then make racist statements about people who you think don't look American despite the fact that they are American. Most people would say that this is a pattern of racism.

Yes they are not all Ron defending himself . 2nd and 3rd were two blacks one addressing the racism the 3rd talking or interviewing in a manner Ron Paul . The 4th Rock doing a comedy act . I never heard rock endorse Ron Paul in that clip . But someone made the video to look as if Chris was endorsing Paul . All kinds of evil out there . You have been hoodwinked by just such a trick . I could infer That Obama was a racist by the fact he is destroying the middle class and come up with all sorts of proof that it is so.
 
Last edited:

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
I'm not asking for governmental action against him. I'm asking for citizens to unite and denounce him for his racism.

As I said your using this forum to spread your lies in the hopes of harming Paul because your misguided fool.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
No, because there are parts of the Constitution, for example the 14th Amendment, that prevent that. Not surprisingly, Paul hates the 14th Amendment. The very Amendment that is partly responsible for brining out an era of more egalitarianism in American society.
The 14th Amendment is illegal. And it was only meant to punish the South. The proponents of it were the very same ones who supported black codes in their northern states. Lincoln's minions hated southerners more than they cared about themselves.

If congress passes a bill that says "Every United States Citizen shall report to detention camps effective immediately" ... this would violate the Due Process clause of the 14th amendment.
No it wouldn't. The 14th Amendment limits the states not the Federal government. It basically inverted the Bill of Rights. The States are not allowed to do a lot of things the Federal government does routinely.
Your 20x more racist than paul is .
He probably is. The fact that Dr. Paul got 30% of the black vote in the 2008 primaries pretty much proves that most blacks don't think he's racist. So since he did so well with blacks in the primaries, the MSM turns the whole thing around with outright lies. I'd love to see those lying SOBs go out of business which they certainly would if Dr. Paul became President.
 

guyver01

Lifer
Sep 25, 2000
22,135
5
61
The fact that Dr. Paul got 30% of the black vote in the 2008 primaries pretty much proves that most blacks don't think he's racist.

o_O

since when does 30% = most?

you using McOwned's version of math that $4.01 = $5.00?

no wonder you got shitty grades in school.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,344
32,959
136
Well, to be honest with you, I am doing more research on these "racist newsletters". And when you say - "how he deems some Americans don't look American according to him, then there's nothing that will convince you that Ron Paul is a racist" - you have to understand that "American" is not a race, but a nationality that encompasses MANY races. And I believe that he is speaking from the point of view of a TSA agent and what they are trained to look for.
The answer to your questions is right here in your post.

You say yourself that 'American' is a nationality that encompasses many races.

First of all, why say 'many' and not 'all'? Are there some races that you feel are not qualified to become American citizens? If you answer yes, then I would argue that your viewpoint is itself racist, and if that is the case then of course you would never see RP's comments as racist as they would just be 'normal' to you.

However, if you believe that 'American' is a nationality that encompasses all races, then the statement that 'someone does not look like an American' is inherently racist. When referring to 'looks,' one can be referring either to the person's physical characteristics or the 'look' of their clothing. There are no other possibilities that could qualify as 'looks.' Since TSA agents all wear uniforms, we can rule out the possibility that he was referring to their attire. Hence (yeah, hence!), he was referring to the physical characteristics of these people.

Physical characteristics can include hairstyle, makeup, tattoos, skin color and facial or body structure. Can you name a hairstyle, makeup style, tattoo, facial structure or body structure that is not 'American'? Of course not, that idea is absurd. Some styles or structures may come from or be influenced by other cultures, but every single one of them can be found on true American citizens. Anyone arguing otherwise would look ignorant, and I don't say that to try to stifle a good debate. Anyone that cares to try to argue this point is welcome to. ;)

So we are left with skin color as the final attribute he could possibly be referring to. But if 'American' is supposed to encompass all races, then all skin colors would qualify as 'American' in appearance. So we can conclude that RP either thinks that certain style choices can disqualify a person as an American or certain skin colors can.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
o_O

since when does 30% = most?

you using McOwned's version of math that $4.01 = $5.00?

no wonder you got shitty grades in school.

Not only that, but it's 30% of black republicans, which are only about 10% of national blacks. Considering that primary turnout is usually fairly low, he was probably voted for by something around 1% of black people nationwide.

Yeah, that totally means they don't think he's racist.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
The 14th Amendment is illegal. And it was only meant to punish the South. The proponents of it were the very same ones who supported black codes in their northern states. Lincoln's minions hated southerners more than they cared about themselves.

How can the Constitution itself be illegal?

Seems like Ron Paul and his fans hate the Constitution, huh?



He probably is. The fact that Dr. Paul got 30% of the black vote in the 2008 primaries pretty much proves that most blacks don't think he's racist. So since he did so well with blacks in the primaries, the MSM turns the whole thing around with outright lies. I'd love to see those lying SOBs go out of business which they certainly would if Dr. Paul became President.

You mean he got some percentage of the black GOP vote? That's probably a tiny tiny fraction of the overall black vote.

Ron Paul is a racist. He released a racist newsletter for years. He defended those racist newsletters. And he has made subsequent racist remarks about how he deems only white people as 'american looking.'

He is probably the most disgusting presidential candidate in quite some time.