- Jul 11, 2010
If you're completely ignorant about things he talks about and prefer your political candidates to debate the morality of abortion as a way of proving they should be the president of our country.
It makes it hard to understand exactly what you are saying.My grammar is horrendous and my run on sentences are of epic proportion. Surely that doesn't stop your ability to read.
Strange how pro-life people are also pro-death penalty. And how after the child is born want to penalize the parents for improper care but give no support for proper care. But then you're nuts too.I'd vote for him in a heartbeat if he were nominated. I'll vote for him in the primary because he's the most stridently pro-life.
I imagine that at some point in you 2300+ post you've made at least one that isn't completely stupid, or maybe in one of your previous accounts, could you please link to that post?It's going to be great when Ron Paul forces all women to wear a red A on their chest for having children out of wedlock.
Because criminals have made their choices, and killing others was one of them, while an unborn child hasn't? It's really not a complicated, or hypocritical stance, though I am pro choice myself, it's not hard to follow.Strange how pro-life people are also pro-death penalty. And how after the child is born want to penalize the parents for improper care but give no support for proper care. But then you're nuts too.
You are also widely considered a joke, and no one takes you particularly seriously because you are consistently wrong, and not particularly bright to boot. Hey that was fun.
It's cute when you try to put together a logical thought.I have an honest question. If a mother decides to give an unborn fetus a lobotomy, just because they don't want to deal with a human that grows up to be cognitive and just wants to always be its mommy. Is that okay? It was her body, and now that it is out of her body, it doesn't change the fact that it was once her body.
Help me here because I generally don't care about abortion, I just don't want it funded with taxpayer money. But would a woman be allowed to mutilate an unborn fetus not enough to kill (is it even killing?) but just seriously alter the fetus?
What you said quite literally makes no sense.people who Vote for status quo corrupt politicians are widely considered a joke in both parties.
Yeah I guess it makes sense tards are this easily entertained.You are also widely considered a joke, and no one takes you particularly seriously because you are consistently wrong, and not particularly bright to boot. Hey that was fun.
This is brought up over and over again by lefties..."XXX is for small government but he wants abortion to be illegal !"Smaller government, yet involve government in abortion decisions. Makes sense if you're sarah palin, or someone else with the IQ of a house plant.
Smaller government, yet involve government in abortion decisions. Makes sense if you're sarah palin, or someone else with the IQ of a house plant.
At the same time, Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.
He has had exactly the same message if you go back and watch some his 68' campaign run. He hasnt flipped on any of his issues yet. He talks about what needs talking about, not the usual fluff pieces thrown about to distract from the real issues that matter.It makes it hard to understand exactly what you are saying.
Out of the group of candidates from 08 or now, He still is the best choice for getting this country back on track.
You might not like his message, but he speaks the cold undeniable truth. in 08 he was the only one saying we spend to much (the government). We live beyond our means. What are people saying now? We spend to much.
The sad part is, since 06 or 08, can't remember, the US Governments spending has gone up 33%.
He wants to cut government spending which is at an unsustainable level.