Romney on '47 percent': I was 'completely wrong'

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Smoblikat

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2011
5,184
107
106
I agree with what he said though. A large portion of America is just leeches who will vote for free stuff.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
I agree with what he said though. A large portion of America is just leeches who will vote for free stuff.

That may be true but that's not what he said. He said that the 47% who don't pay income tax (federal) are leeches on welfare, etc. etc. Just because people don't pay federal taxes does not mean that they are on welfare. They fall below the income tax line but don't confuse the two.

By the way, the 47% who don't pay taxes are not going to get anything from Romney's tax cuts anyway unless he removes their deductions, which, in that case, might cause them to pay taxes (i.e. tax hike).

We have gotten to the point that we have cut taxes so much, in an effort to keep people and economy moving along, that nearly 50% don't pay federal income tax now. We have subsidized these people with tax cuts, tax credits, and credit (from banks) in the face of decade + of declining wages from pressures of offshoring and cheap global slave labor. It's only going to get worse unless we fix the job situation with real jobs that make stuff and pay good wages. Otherwise, we're just pissing in the wind and it's blowing right back into our faces.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
I don't like the guy but it is possiable he was thinking of 47 million people on food stamps . I don't know / I wouldn't think he would knowingly say that because the fact would come . IF your running for pres.
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
I don't like the guy but it is possiable he was thinking of 47 million people on food stamps . I don't know / I wouldn't think he would knowingly say that because the fact would come . IF your running for pres.

How the hell would someone confuse 47 million with 47 percent? They aren't even close to being the same thing.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
I agree with what he said though. A large portion of America is just leeches who will vote for free stuff.

But then he said he was completely wrong...

So while you're agreeing with Mitt7, you'll be asked to upgrade to Mitt8 and there will be a new licensing fee.
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
But then he said he was completely wrong...

So while you're agreeing with Mitt7, you'll be asked to upgrade to Mitt8 and there will be a new licensing fee.

Just shake the etch-a-sketch, brand new policy!
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,173
32,570
136
I don't like the guy but it is possiable he was thinking of 47 million people on food stamps . I don't know / I wouldn't think he would knowingly say that because the fact would come . IF your running for pres.

Not possible since the next day Romney claimed he was making a political argument and doubled down. This was before he disavowed his comment.
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
I think this will be a huge fizzle tonight when it undoubtedly comes up. I can't wait.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,173
32,570
136
Prolly a bigger fizzle if Obama brings up the ramifications of Romney being in favor of a "personhood" law
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
I agree with what he said though. A large portion of America is just leeches who will vote for free stuff.

Those soldiers fighting overseas for our country need to pay up, right? It's not enough that they risked life and limb to fight for you.