>I tend to agree with all his points. What do you think?
Hmm. If I were still single, it might be a tossup, or even in the theater's favor when comparing the movies to at home watching on my projector.
I go to the local theater which shows $3 movies. I eat popcorn at home before going, or eat a meal so that I'm full, and not tempted to get the overpriced snacks. I'm tempted to watch 2 or 3 movies a month at the theater, so that would be $9 a month for me, or $108 a year. That would be $324 over 3 years.
The reason I came up with that number is because I paid $300 for my Optoma DLP projector, which has lasted just over 3 years. Now it has white spot syndrome, and I'll need to spend another $350 or so if I want to stick with 800x600, or $450+ if I want to upgrade to XGA or better. I don't like the thought of paying over $100 a year for my projector. However, I guess that is about what I'd be paying for going to the movies.
Now to be more realistic, I'm married now, so the cost of the theater doubles. My wife often wants popcorn, so it goes up even more. Adding our several kids once in a while, and the cost goes up even more. Realistically, we end up going to far fewer movies than I'd like to, and watch the rest at home. If you count all the movies we end up watching for free on DVD from our library, we probably save $600 a year or more.
With our kids, it is just really worth it to be able to pause the movie when something arises, like someone needing to go to the bathroom, or wanting to split longer movies up into two halves. I have a strategically placed microwave, so we can make popcorn whenever we want to. My kids can also talk and make noise this way without bothering other moviegoers. The only way we can get the same feeling at the movies is by going to the drive in. (where kids are only a buck, by the way) Speaking of drive-ins, our local one opens in just 9 days! Even with my projector at home, I'm looking forward to watching the Avengers there.