Ooh, we've got ourselves another nullification crisis.
Louisiana is of the rails
Although this leads to an immediate question that if Louisiana thought this language was effective why didn't they pass it 40 years ago?
Ooh, we've got ourselves another nullification crisis.
Louisiana is of the rails
Louisiana is of the rails
"He is favored to win..."We're basically already there in some places:
GOP candidate says he tells daughters to ‘lie back and enjoy it’ if rape is inevitable
https://wgntv.com/news/gop-candidat...-lie-back-and-enjoy-it-if-rape-is-inevitable/
He did lose, at least, to a woman even. But by kind of a disgustingly small amount though. And he is a Q fuck, of course, aren't most people who actually want to have sex with children?"He is favored to win..."
I'm sure he tells his daughters to lay back and enjoy it multiple times a week. Where are the Q fucks when you need them?
www.bridgemi.com
That should be illegal. A licensed pharmacist should be required to honor an Rx.
So I've asked this before of pro-life folks but never got a decent answer. Maybe you can educate me. If you believe that abortion kills a child and that's the primary reason not to abort how to do you reconcile all the spontaneously aborted embryos/miscarriages that parents create while trying to procreate.I'm really confused by this. For the longest time in pro-life circles, we wanted to prosecute abortion providers for murder, but not women who seek them out.
Maybe it's because I live in the north east, but something has really changed over time. There wasn't any impetus to investigate every miscarriage as a possible abortion (which is logistically impossible anyway).
It's getting pretty crazy, IMHO, even for us 'old school' pro-lifers.
God's will, lol. Miscarried souls go to heaven. Aborted souls go to hell.So I've asked this before of pro-life folks but never got a decent answer. Maybe you can educate me. If you believe that abortion kills a child and that's the primary reason not to abort how to do you reconcile all the spontaneously aborted embryos/miscarriages that parents create while trying to procreate.
In your 20's the risk is around 15%
In your 40's the risk is around 85%
Taking RU486 without the second pill only causes abortion in 60-85% of cases. With both its above 95%
Since most people do not get pregnant the first month they try the above means almost all parents have killed some kids to have the kids they do - if you believe the above.
Interesting. So God either doesn't know which souls will be aborted or purposely sends innocent baby souls to hell to punish abortion. I wonder where in the bible this idea comes from.....God's will, lol. Miscarried souls go to heaven. Aborted souls go to hell.
AFAIK the Bible only talks about how adulteresses SHOULD abort their babies and that the penalty for causing a miscarriage is in line with property damage rather than killing an actual born human.Interesting. So God either doesn't know which souls will be aborted or purposely sends innocent baby souls to hell to punish abortion. I wonder where in the bible this idea comes from.....![]()
Oh, you really thought they were against pedophiles."He is favored to win..."
I'm sure he tells his daughters to lay back and enjoy it multiple times a week. Where are the Q fucks when you need them?
Nope, like everything else, it's projection.Oh, you really thought they were against pedophiles.
Fair enough.Yeah, not here for another abortion or religious debate. Just been watching the thread and was stuck by how things have changed. That's all.
@Paratus The simply answer is unsatisfying. I'm not smart enough or educated enough in Christian theology to make the complicated answer simple.
Sounds like a 1st amendment violation to me.
Senate Republicans are trying to find the Democrats responsible for this.
Weeeeellllll... the simple answer is: "Don't base legislation/SCOTUS decisions on Christian theology".Yeah, not here for another abortion or religious debate. Just been watching the thread and was stuck by how things have changed. That's all.
@Paratus The simply answer is unsatisfying. I'm not smart enough or educated enough in Christian theology to make the complicated answer simple.
I'm really confused by this. For the longest time in pro-life circles, we wanted to prosecute abortion providers for murder, but not women who seek them out.
This guy is a POS.He did lose, at least, to a woman even. But by kind of a disgustingly small amount though. And he is a Q fuck, of course, aren't most people who actually want to have sex with children?
![]()
Robert Regan, tagged ‘perhaps worst candidate ever,’ loses House bid to Dem - Bridge Michigan
Democrat Carol Glanville defeated Republican Robert “RJ” Regan in a special election for a West Michigan House seat considered safely conservative. Comments on rape, QAnon and conspiratories about Jews turned off his own party.www.bridgemi.com
This guy is a POS.
From a link in that article from his daughter , who said don't vote for him.
![]()
Michigan candidate’s daughter urges people not to vote for him in viral tweet
The daughter of a candidate running for a seat in the Michigan state House has drawn viral attention online after taking to Twitter earlier this week to plead with voters not to elect her father&nb…thehill.com
"The only place where I really see systemic racism would be the abortion clinic cause they seem to target the African American community.”
“I don’t buy into this whole systemic racism thing at all,” he later said.
"“I’m not saying there’s not hurdles to overcome. We all have hurdles to overcome. You know, as a quote-unquote rich, white, Christian male, people look at me a certain way. And it’s not always good. So, everybody has obstacles to overcome
"He also said, unlike his daughter, he doesn’t believe white privilege exists "
Seriously WTF!
He has problems to overcome as a rich, white, Christian male???
"“I’m not saying there’s not hurdles to overcome. We all have hurdles to overcome. You know, as a quote-unquote rich, white, Christian male, people look at me a certain way. And it’s not always good. So, everybody has obstacles to overcome
You can do a lot better than this.So I've asked this before of pro-life folks but never got a decent answer. Maybe you can educate me. If you believe that abortion kills a child and that's the primary reason not to abort how to do you reconcile all the spontaneously aborted embryos/miscarriages that parents create while trying to procreate.
In your 20's the risk is around 15%
In your 40's the risk is around 85%
Taking RU486 without the second pill only causes abortion in 60-85% of cases. With both its above 95%
Since most people do not get pregnant the first month they try the above means almost all parents have killed some kids to have the kids they do - if you believe the above.
You can do a lot better than this.
Conflating a natural phenomena with abortion is absurd. By that logic you could point out that every single person is going to die, so killing them is natural and inevitable. How can that be a crime?
Lets be honest here, abortion is about convenience. We flush those kids down the toilet because having them around would be a lot of trouble and expense. All the arguments about how many die naturally or it just being a clump of cells is what we tell ourselves so we don't feel bad about doing it.
I know what abortion is, I know the reasons why it exists. The only argument for it that holds water is that sometimes it's the lessor of two evils.
