woolfe9998
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2013
- 16,242
- 14,243
- 136
According to the Washington Post, Republicans are asking for a "fig leaf" - concessions on Obamacare. But why should the Democrats reward Republicans for doing what both sides really want? And under the new Republican plan, the debit limit would be raise only until the end of January, guaranteeing another round of blackmail in less than four months.
No, I'm afraid Obama really needs to swat this down. "No deal."
If the Republicans want to include some sort of language which requires good-faith negotiations (from BOTH sides, with NOTHING off the table - not Obamacare concessions and not tax increases), that would be fine. But asking for concessions from Obama while offering absolutely nothing in return is a non-starter.
I'm a bit hazy on the details, because they seem to vary depending on which article you read. For example, a four month extension on the debt ceiling is news to me. Last article I read said the GOP was offering 6 weeks.
And what concessions are they asking for in exchange? The repeal of the medical device tax?
I don't think a short term extension is something Obama should reject if it's just a clean bill with no concessions. If they want concessions, then I agree, he shouldn't offer any, not under threat of default.
I think we should just wait and see what comes of the current negotiations. It seems to be a pretty fluid situation.
