• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Right Or Wrong? (Sexual Ethics)

I

Isla

Elite member
So.

Let's say a husband and wife agree to sex once or twice a week. This isn't really enough for the husband but it is more than enough for the wife. The wife complies as graciously and pleasantly as possible, but again, once or twice a week.

It's been 48 hours. Wife is VERY tired. Wife just wants to go to sleep, and very kindly says, "No sweetheart, I'm sorry, but I need to sleep".


2AM. Wife wakes up to being porked in her sleep.

Right? Why?

Wrong? Why?

Please vote in the poll and let me know what you think about situations such as this.
 
Looks like they need to come up with some sort of arrangement that better meets the husband's needs...because this one obviously isn't working.

But no, it's not right to git it on without the other person being consciously aware of the act.
 
Well, consideration to the wife has to be taken in great respect, because genuine tiredness is one of the things that supersedes any "urges."
 
Originally posted by: Isla
So.

Let's say a husband and wife agree to sex once or twice a week. This isn't really enough for the husband but it is more than enough for the wife. The wife complies as graciously and pleasantly as possible, but again, once or twice a week.

It's been 48 hours. Wife is VERY tired. Wife just wants to go to sleep, and very kindly says, "No sweetheart, I'm sorry, but I need to sleep".


2AM. Wife wakes up to being porked in her sleep.

Right? Why?

Wrong? Why?

Please vote in the poll and let me know what you think about situations such as this.
Click to expand...

LOL

How can you come up with all of these controversial topics?
 
Originally posted by: Whisper
Looks like they need to come up with some sort of arrangement that better meets the husband's needs...because this one obviously isn't working.

But no, it's not right to git it on without the other person being consciously aware of the act.
Click to expand...

I agree with this
 
Originally posted by: Whisper
Looks like they need to come up with some sort of arrangement that better meets the husband's needs...because this one obviously isn't working.

But no, it's not right to git it on without the other person being consciously aware of the act.
Click to expand...

agreed...
 
I voted no... but I wouldn't be surprised if Husband stops bugging Wife soon about it. ie, He went outside of marriage.
 
Well, I'm not married.. and right now I'm single. But, I would say that its wrong. It should be a mutual decsicion between two consenting people. Both should be able to attain some sort of pleasure out of it. Besides, if the husband did that then he's simply taking advantage of the wife. He's, in a way, using her.
 
The answer isn't so much right or wrong as "annoying" unless he actually forcibly raped her, which would be wrong.

However, such a couple sounds like they have one hell of a sh!tty sex life if they actually have to come up with a schedule for when to have sex.
 
Originally posted by: filmmaker
Originally posted by: Whisper
Looks like they need to come up with some sort of arrangement that better meets the husband's needs...because this one obviously isn't working.

But no, it's not right to git it on without the other person being consciously aware of the act.
Click to expand...

I agree with this
Click to expand...

Indeed.

Sounds a lot like rape, actually.

 
Yikes. This is obviously very wrong. Sexual activities that are not mutually consensual are ALWAYS wrong in my book.

I'd be pretty upset if I was on the non-consenting end.

Your use of "porked" is making me chuckle 😀

 
Originally posted by: PatboyX
i think its strange that they "agreed" to have sex a certain amount of times in one week.
Click to expand...
yeah, like it's a chore
rolleye.gif

 
Originally posted by: crumpet19
Well, I'm not married.. and right now I'm single. But, I would say that its wrong. It should be a mutual decsicion between two consenting people. Both should be able to attain some sort of pleasure out of it. Besides, if the husband did that then he's simply taking advantage of the wife. He's, in a way, using her.
Click to expand...


That's what I think. This particular husband has been told that it's OK to masturbate. Use porn, not wife.

BTW, once or twice a week is considered pretty regular.
 
If the wife cannot provide enough satisfaction for the man, he should descreetly find other outlets to suppliment the loved one.
 
Originally posted by: lowtech
Originally posted by: Isla
So.

Let's say a husband and wife agree to sex once or twice a week. This isn't really enough for the husband but it is more than enough for the wife. The wife complies as graciously and pleasantly as possible, but again, once or twice a week.

It's been 48 hours. Wife is VERY tired. Wife just wants to go to sleep, and very kindly says, "No sweetheart, I'm sorry, but I need to sleep".


2AM. Wife wakes up to being porked in her sleep.

Right? Why?

Wrong? Why?

Please vote in the poll and let me know what you think about situations such as this.
Click to expand...

LOL
Click to expand...

heh, that's the only thing I could think of too when reading this!

On a side note, my wife likes to be woken/waken? up with some, uh, action. Says it's nice cuz at that time, her mind is completely clear and she's not trying to switch gears from what was already on her mind to gettin it on. When it starts happenin in the middle of the night, she's able to focus on the task at hand! Which means more :Q for the both of us!

So, in my case, I'm gonna answer yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top