Originally posted by: Away
Originally posted by: nutxo
California is full of socialists.
Fixed that for you.
Meh
Lets call a spade a spade.
Originally posted by: Away
Originally posted by: nutxo
California is full of socialists.
Fixed that for you.
Originally posted by: LokutusofBorg
Keep at 'em senseamp. Nobody has the right to do something that is known to harm someone else. The statistical evidence of the harmful effects of second-hand smoke is irrefutable.
I find it ludicrous that there is a state law that protects me from second-hand smoke when I go into any public building, but it does not extend to (nor is there a separate law that covers) my place of residence. Every state law covering smoking in or near public buildings should also outlaw, or have a sister law that outlaws, smoking inside apartments and within 25 feet (or whatever the public law stipulates) of anyone else's windows or doors. If you want to smoke, go stand out by your car, somewhere away from the building. I have no problem with that. If your smoke does waft over to my window, I can close it. Having noxious chemicals come *through your walls* is not something anybody should have to put up with. There is no way to escape that. I can guarantee you there is no apartment building in existence where the units are airtight from one another. If you smoke inside you are forcing your neighbors to smoke with you. That is blatant disregard for the well-being of others.
Originally posted by: LokutusofBorg
Wet-walls, any shared venting space, the holes they drill for wiring, even. Just cause you don't smell it doesn't mean it isn't coming in. Aren't top floor apartments generally warmer than bottom floor? Even in the winter? Why do you think that is?
I can attest to this. Smokers are inconsiderate pricks.The City Council approved an ordinance this month that will ban lighting up in all multiunit housing by Jan. 1, 2011. Officials say smoking in multiunit housing exposes people to secondhand smoke, which can travel between apartments.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Ummm...good?
I can attest to this. Smokers are inconsiderate pricks.The City Council approved an ordinance this month that will ban lighting up in all multiunit housing by Jan. 1, 2011. Officials say smoking in multiunit housing exposes people to secondhand smoke, which can travel between apartments.
But realistically, is a smoker living in an apartment going to be able to cover the health care bills of anyone (even themselves)?Originally posted by: her209
That said, I think a smoker should be able to be held financially responsible should the second hand smoke cause health problems for his neighbors.
Originally posted by: Hacp
I see no reason why smoking should be banned. Instead, they should tax tobacco at unreasonable levels. That way, smokers can remain poor and live in poor people areas while more educated people can enjoy their neighborhoods without the toxic poisoning their bodies.
Originally posted by: dum
Originally posted by: Hacp
I see no reason why smoking should be banned. Instead, they should tax tobacco at unreasonable levels. That way, smokers can remain poor and live in poor people areas while more educated people can enjoy their neighborhoods without the toxic poisoning their bodies.
reason 1
reason 2
reason 3
reason 4
Those look like 4 good reasons to me.
Originally posted by: bctbct
There are many inherent risks around us each day and we choose to accept them because they benefit us. Now just because you dont like some of these things doesnt mean they should be banned or where would we draw the line?
I could argue buses should be banned because they emit nasty black smoke, impeed traffic, are funded by tax dollars....and I dont ride them.
Everyone enjoys the fruits of the habit, but some are hypocritical to whine about it.
Anyone who says they had actual smoke seep through the walls of their apartment...is full of shit.
Originally posted by: bctbct
Anyone who says they had actual smoke seep through the walls of their apartment...is full of shit.
You can shove the accusations of lying where the sun don't shine, and cap it off with a burning cigarette.Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Yep, they are either exaggerating big time or outright lying in an effort to support their assinine position.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Ummm...good?
I can attest to this. Smokers are inconsiderate pricks.The City Council approved an ordinance this month that will ban lighting up in all multiunit housing by Jan. 1, 2011. Officials say smoking in multiunit housing exposes people to secondhand smoke, which can travel between apartments.
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL, California.
My sentiment exactly.
It's much easier to find the votes for a smoking ban. That also gives you some perspective on how lowly smoking is viewed by our society these days.Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Ummm...good?
I can attest to this. Smokers are inconsiderate pricks.The City Council approved an ordinance this month that will ban lighting up in all multiunit housing by Jan. 1, 2011. Officials say smoking in multiunit housing exposes people to secondhand smoke, which can travel between apartments.
So are you, but there hasn't been a jpeyton ban yet.