silverpig
Lifer
- Jul 29, 2001
- 27,703
- 12
- 81
The government has no right to tell them how much profit they can have.
Sure they do.
If you don't think so, then create your own government that is more efficient and drive this one out of business.
The government has no right to tell them how much profit they can have.
Sure they do.
If you don't think so, then create your own government that is more efficient and drive this one out of business.
That's the benefit side. The cost side, which you either ignore, or are ignorant of, is they can't discriminate based on pre-existing conditions, rescind coverage, or have overhead including profit in excess of 20%.
In what way is that a cost? They pass it along with the cost of health insurance. And if the pools fail to materialize they have legislated themselves the govt picking up the tab.
They have to cut overhead+profit to 20% of premiums. That is a cost. Higher volumes, but lower margins. The risk corridor is only for first 3 years transition period.
Sure the transition period is 3 years is until they extend it. It isnt like this law hasnt had extensions before![]()
You can add a public option if you think private companies are making too much money of Obamacare.
Hey I have been saying to have a high deductible public option for years. But I am under no illusion it will redistribute wealth downwards either.
No they don't you moron. That is not the role of government and they are violating the rights of the business. You're a pathetic excuse of a human being for thinking it's alright to tell them how much profit they can have.
The role of the government is whatever the people decide it to be. Businesses don't have rights; they aren't people.
The role of the government is to provide a safe and stable environment for the prosperity of its citizens, not necessarily for its businesses, and the needs of the latter cannot override the needs of the former.
It's funny, you think things like unions and governments aren't part of the free market, when in fact they are consequences of it, and vital parts of it.
No it's not you moron. The role of the government is restricted by the Constitution.
Keep making assumptions and spouting BS.
Let me guess, you think income taxes are illegal but don't know about the 16th amendment.
The role of the government is whatever the people decide it to be. Businesses don't have rights; they aren't people.
The role of the government is to provide a safe and stable environment for the prosperity of its citizens, not necessarily for its businesses, and the needs of the latter cannot override the needs of the former.
It's funny, you think things like unions and governments aren't part of the free market, when in fact they are consequences of it, and vital parts of it.
I guess soon we can proceed to the next step just seize your savings and 401(k) accounts.
I think the richest of the rich are pondering how to level the middle class, not the playing field. Middle class wages are just expenses that could be squeezed out to increase profits.
The problem is that once every drop of juice is squeezed out and the fruit runs dry, then what?
Keep chipping away at the foundation and moving it to the top of the building and eventually, the building will collapse......
here's a thought - why not make all insurance companies non profit? that way there is no point to denying claims, because all funds should be used (aside from running the company) to insure the policy holders.
obviously there's still a balance of claims vs. revenue, but i would expect it to be far better than having a for-profit, publicly-traded company that's trying to maximize ROI for its shareholders.
You listen to Rush, why are we not surprised.According to Rush that will be happening very soon:
11-29-2012
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/11/29/details_the_plan_to_steal_your_401_k
The Plan to Steal Your 401(k)
RUSH: We have a couple of sound bites from the New School professor of economics, the New School for Social Research professor of economics Teresa Ghilarducci, who explains the theft -- uh, the purchase -- of your 401(k) by the government. TIME Magazine now has a big story out saying that this must happen. It must have to happen to save us all.
here's a thought - why not make all insurance companies non profit?
here's a thought - why not make all insurance companies non profit? that way there is no point to denying claims, because all funds should be used (aside from running the company) to insure the policy holders.
obviously there's still a balance of claims vs. revenue, but i would expect it to be far better than having a for-profit, publicly-traded company that's trying to maximize ROI for its shareholders.
So you want the government to use force against them? That's nice, typical liberal. The government has no right to do that.
No it's not you moron. The role of the government is restricted by the Constitution.
Keep making assumptions and spouting BS.
Teresa Ghilarducci, who explains the theft -- uh, the purchase -- of your 401(k) by the government.
