• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Richardson pulls out due to investigation...

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

This must have a bit of truth to it, otherwise there is no way he'd pull out. Seems pay for play isn't only an Illinois problem....

Quoting Richardson in the article:

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

The article further states:

A person familiar with the proceedings has told The Associated Press that the grand jury is looking into possible "pay-to-play" dealings between CDR Financial Products and someone in a position to push the contract through with the state of New Mexico.

Try waiting for the truth. There's an ongoing investigation, and you'll have your answers soon enough, but unless you have further evidence, the certainty inferred by your use of the word, "must" is presumptuous, at best.
 
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

This must have a bit of truth to it, otherwise there is no way he'd pull out. Seems pay for play isn't only an Illinois problem....

Quoting Richardson in the article:

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

The article further states:

A person familiar with the proceedings has told The Associated Press that the grand jury is looking into possible "pay-to-play" dealings between CDR Financial Products and someone in a position to push the contract through with the state of New Mexico.

Try waiting for the truth. There's an ongoing investigation, and you'll have your answers soon enough, but unless you have further evidence, the certainty inferred by your use of the word, "must" is more than you can't prove.

Hmmm... seems to be a better "reasonable suspicion" than your in that other thread 😉
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

I've read all about it and as far as I can tell there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.. so instead of a bunch of question marks I'd like to see from you a specific allegation backed up by facts.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Remember pay to play in Iraq. Halliburton, Exxon, Chevron, Cheney. Billions down the drain and thousands dead.
 
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Remember pay to play in Iraq. Halliburton, Exxon, Chevron, Cheney. Billions down the drain and thousands dead.

Hey look, it's the typical liberal troll duhversion....

:cookie:
 
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

I've read all about it and as far as I can tell there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.. so instead of a bunch of question marks I'd like to see from you a specific allegation backed up by facts.

This is what I stated:
Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?
If you don't like it - tough. There are no "allegations" besides being under a cloud - which he is to any rational person looking at the Blago situation.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Remember pay to play in Iraq. Halliburton, Exxon, Chevron, Cheney. Billions down the drain and thousands dead.

Hey look, it's the typical liberal troll duhversion....

:cookie:

I had chocolate chip cookie with pecans yesterday, it was pretty strong.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Uh, Blago is not part of the BHO admin. What are you saying Rahm did wrong?
 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Uh, Blago is not part of the BHO admin. What are you saying Rahm did wrong?

Halliburton had no bid contracts with Cheney still collecting a paycheck from them. That is a fact.
 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Uh, Blago is not part of the BHO admin. What are you saying Rahm did wrong?

:roll: AGAIN!!!


Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

I've read all about it and as far as I can tell there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.. so instead of a bunch of question marks I'd like to see from you a specific allegation backed up by facts.

This is what I stated:
Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?
If you don't like it - tough. There are no "allegations" besides being under a cloud - which he is to any rational person looking at the Blago situation.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

Uh, Blago is not part of the BHO admin. What are you saying Rahm did wrong?

:roll: AGAIN!!!


Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Farang
Who is the other BHO "admin"?

Rahm? Duh.

What wrongdoing is he accused of?

Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?

Have you been living under a rock? Hello? Blago? BHO's Senate seat? Rahm's seat? Surely you can't be that naive...

I've read all about it and as far as I can tell there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.. so instead of a bunch of question marks I'd like to see from you a specific allegation backed up by facts.

This is what I stated:
Another BHO "admin" under a cloud?
If you don't like it - tough. There are no "allegations" besides being under a cloud - which he is to any rational person looking at the Blago situation.

Bad wording, I guess...

But yeah, Rahm is fine as of now. He did speak to Blago about replacements, but that was on a professional level. He doesn't have a connection to the illegal stuff.
 
epic lulz.. to be 'under a cloud' there still needs to be specific allegations of wrongdoing. You don't just get to place people 'under clouds' willy-nilly
 
Originally posted by: Farang
epic lulz.. to be 'under a cloud' there still needs to be specific allegations of wrongdoing. You don't just get to place people 'under clouds' willy-nilly

epic partisan naivety :roll: There is an investigation into BHO's seat and Blago trying to sell it. Rahm is smack dab in the middle of it as he had conversations with Blago. So while there may not be specific allegations against him(I never stated there were) - there most definitely a cloud around him and the situation as a whole.

Now are you apologists just going to whine about "another" instead of looking at Richardson?
 
Back
Top