• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Richard Dawkins seeks arrest of Pope

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You mean like Saddam Husseim? (im pretty sure he had diplomatic inmunity)
or Milosevic (or w/e his name was , the guy from Serbia in the 90s, head of a sovereign state too)

There are crimes that diplomatic inmunity or not , should not be tolerated, Genocide would be #1 , and i would put Child rape close behind it).
really? I mean, rape is pretty bad, but really? you'd put covering up a molester on par with the deliberate extermination of entire races of people?
 
Dawkins and Co. have a long war.. ahem, road... ahead of us... ahem, them... considering there are people out there who still believe every word some book(s) and institution says is the divine truth because said book(s) and institution commands it, and thusly it must be so.

I really need to write, The Divine Comedy 2: the Comedy Hath Cometh.
 
Dawkins and Co. have a long war.. ahem, road... ahead of us... ahem, them... considering there are people out there who still believe every word some book(s) and institution says is the divine truth because said book(s) and institution commands it, and thusly it must be so.
those people probably aren't Catholics.

one of the first things we were taught in religion class in high school was that the bible wasn't a literal document.
 
really? I mean, rape is pretty bad, but really? you'd put covering up a molester on par with the deliberate extermination of entire races of people?

i didn't say that child rape (or covering for it ) was equal to genocide.

i said genocide would be #1 , and child rape behind it.

and i stand by my statement , people who commit either should never under ANY circumstances be given a free pass.

Specially if they want to keep waving the moral high-ground flag on every single subject that comes up in the world, be it , abortion ,gay marriage, condom use, etc...

I mean... really, how can ANYONE vouch for the man who does this:

Goes to the poorest and most AIDS infected parts of the world (Africa) and condemn the use of condoms and says that AIDS might be bad but condoms are worse. which will directly cause THOUSANDS , yes THOUSANDS of people being infected and dying from the disease because they refused to protect themselves because it was a "sin". THAT to me is GENOCIDE.

and most likely helped in the coverup and concealment of priests who commited child rape (do not call it molestation to make it sound prettier, its child rape) repeatedly.

We're are not in medieval times anymore, people including him should be made accountable for these crimes.
 
Goes to the poorest and most AIDS infected parts of the world (Africa) and condemn the use of condoms and says that AIDS might be bad but condoms are worse. which will directly cause THOUSANDS , yes THOUSANDS of people being infected and dying from the disease because they refused to protect themselves because it was a "sin". THAT to me is GENOCIDE.
from the church POV, the purpose of sex is procreation. if you're not intending to make a baby (and you probably shouldn't be if it's going to be born infected with aids) you probably shouldn't be having sex.

furthermore, millions of catholics worldwide ignore the church's stance on birth control and pre-marital sex in general... why is the pope responsible for Africans' inability to think for themselves?
 
from the church POV, the purpose of sex is procreation. if you're not intending to make a baby (and you probably shouldn't be if it's going to be born infected with aids) you probably shouldn't be having sex.

furthermore, millions of catholics worldwide ignore the church's stance on birth control and pre-marital sex in general... why is the pope responsible for Africans' inability to think for themselves?

The problem is using his position of religious authority to explicitly condemn a healthy practice. The Church can maintain that sex before marriage is a sin, but the realistic expectation is that people will do it anyway. The least they could do, if not encourage condom use, is at least not discourage it.
 
from the church POV, the purpose of sex is procreation. if you're not intending to make a baby (and you probably shouldn't be if it's going to be born infected with aids) you probably shouldn't be having sex.

You have to be honest now... do you really expect anyone (even the pope) to believe that people in africa (in the entire world actually) are going to keep it in their pants, just because their religion says so? , i mean come on... not even their own priests keet it in their pants. it's human nature.

Theres a line between dogma and reality and when peoples lives hang in the balance of that line as to whether theyll die of aids or not then the human and MORAL thing to do is to advocate for the use of condoms.


furthermore, millions of catholics worldwide ignore the church's stance on birth control and pre-marital sex in general... why is the pope responsible for Africans' inability to think for themselves?

The more ignorant and uneducated are the most susceptible to religious brain washing, thats why the most religious parts of the world are often the most underdeveloped.
 
I'd take it a step further, Anti-Theist FTW. IMO, Any religion does more harm than good in the end..

Anti-theist? Christ, what do you think atheism is. Bignateyk's comment was stupid too. I don't feel like explaining it for the billionth time, maybe you both should read a damn article and educate yourself.
 
Anti-theist? Christ, what do you think atheism is. Bignateyk's comment was stupid too. I don't feel like explaining it for the billionth time, maybe you both should read a damn article and educate yourself.

There's a difference between Atheist and Anti-Theist. Atheism is considered the belief there are no gods, and Anti-Theism is a willful opposition of Theism. While often one in the same, that's not always the case. Consider yourself edumacated..
 
Last edited:
Some of the stuff I have read, if true, would seem to me to make the Catholic Church a serial pedophile organization. For instance, in Germany, the Church allegedly knew of repeated charges against a Priest, but did not report him to the authorities. It could even be claimed they aided the priest by transferring him out of the country to keep him safe from being charged.

you mean..... South Park was right??!!!!!!
 
Woahhh I need to do some reading. Had no idea the pope was in trouble with the law.

The pope is nothing but a regular person, a sinner, just like everyone of us - capable of committing sinful acts just like the rest of us. I hate how the catholic church treats him like he's the second coming of Christ or something. 😛

yeah, one with a penchant for protecting pedos. Proven.

🙄
 
I predict the Swiss Guard is going to assassinate Dawkins....

hard to be sneaky with those giant ass Halbreds!

p135928-Rome-Swiss_Guard.jpg
 
Last edited:
hard to be sneaky with those giant house Halbreds!
the swiss guard are kinda crazy.

my friend feinted inside St. Peter's... we were surrounded by guards from out of nowhere in like seconds.

they looked kinda like the secret service guys that you see in movies (black suits, earpiece thing, etc)
 
the swiss guard are kinda crazy.

my friend feinted inside St. Peter's... we were surrounded by guards from out of nowhere in like seconds.

they looked kinda like the secret service guys that you see in movies (black suits, earpiece thing, etc)

are you sure those were Swiss Guard? I posted a pic of the Swiss guard, which, iirc, are more traditional and essentially useless these days. I don't think the Swiss provide a legit modernized security force for the Vatican (like what you are describing), but I could be wrong.
 
are you sure those were Swiss Guard? I posted a pic of the Swiss guard, which, iirc, are more traditional and essentially useless these days. I don't think the Swiss provide a legit modernized security force for the Vatican (like what you are describing), but I could be wrong.
I could definitely be wrong, I always assumed that the swiss guard were the ones who provided all the vatican city security..
 
The more ignorant and uneducated are the most susceptible to religious brain washing, thats why the most religious parts of the world are often the most underdeveloped.
Also amusing: The evangelist networks often seem to market the usual "as-seen-on-TV" crap that's just another scam. Things like that magic cellphone antenna that claims to boost your range just by sticking it over the battery, or various health products which are surprisingly effective - just as effective as a small gel-cap filled with water.
 
Also amusing: The evangelist networks often seem to market the usual "as-seen-on-TV" crap that's just another scam. Things like that magic cellphone antenna that claims to boost your range just by sticking it over the battery, or various health products which are surprisingly effective - just as effective as a small gel-cap filled with water.

You never see those ads on CNN, TBS, USA or almost any other basic cable/UPN type 2nd tier broadcast station. 🙄
 
Last edited:
Also amusing: The evangelist networks often seem to market the usual "as-seen-on-TV" crap that's just another scam. Things like that magic cellphone antenna that claims to boost your range just by sticking it over the battery, or various health products which are surprisingly effective - just as effective as a small gel-cap filled with water.
IQ-v-Religion-graph-atheism-3511654-510-289.gif
 
Back
Top