- Mar 9, 2000
- 13,076
- 1
- 0
Bullshit."There's no way either us or our daughter would do anything we knew to be illegal," Pate said, promising to remove the software quickly. "I don't think anybody knew this was illegal, just a way to get some music."
Originally posted by: NogginBoink
Bullshit."There's no way either us or our daughter would do anything we knew to be illegal," Pate said, promising to remove the software quickly. "I don't think anybody knew this was illegal, just a way to get some music."
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
I'm pretty sure their subpoenas wouldn't work in Canada![]()
Originally posted by: Paulson
What I hope is that buymusic.com really picks up, and the RIAA can't get it's hands on the internet market (where they would make more money than just getting a certain percentage of the money)
Sales aren't especially low, they're just lower than they were a few years ago. Instead of thinking logically and realizing that the sh!tty economy is the major part of the problem, the RIAA is trying to sue every file sharer and their brother (and their parents). Not the best way to solve the supposed "problem," IMHO.Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Originally posted by: Paulson
What I hope is that buymusic.com really picks up, and the RIAA can't get it's hands on the internet market (where they would make more money than just getting a certain percentage of the money)
If the RIAA is so hampered by low sales...
Bullsh!t yourself. I've spoken with many non-tech savvy people who had no idea that file sharing was illegal. Just like that guy, they had thought they found a great way to get free music. When I would tell that it was illegal, they would be honestly surprised.Originally posted by: NogginBoink
Bullshit."There's no way either us or our daughter would do anything we knew to be illegal," Pate said, promising to remove the software quickly. "I don't think anybody knew this was illegal, just a way to get some music."
Originally posted by: jliechty
Sales aren't especially low, they're just lower than they were a few years ago. Instead of thinking logically and realizing that the sh!tty economy is the major part of the problem, the RIAA is trying to sue every file sharer and their brother (and their parents). Not the best way to solve the supposed "problem," IMHO.Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Originally posted by: Paulson
What I hope is that buymusic.com really picks up, and the RIAA can't get it's hands on the internet market (where they would make more money than just getting a certain percentage of the money)
If the RIAA is so hampered by low sales...
Originally posted by: jliechty
Sales aren't especially low, they're just lower than they were a few years ago. Instead of thinking logically and realizing that the sh!tty economy is the major part of the problem, the RIAA is trying to sue every file sharer and their brother (and their parents). Not the best way to solve the supposed "problem," IMHO.Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Originally posted by: Paulson
What I hope is that buymusic.com really picks up, and the RIAA can't get it's hands on the internet market (where they would make more money than just getting a certain percentage of the money)
If the RIAA is so hampered by low sales...
Pate said that he never personally downloaded music and that he so zealously respects copyrights that he does not videotape movies off cable television channels.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Everyone should fight the RIAA they will go bankrupt. It's not that hard to file motions and defend yourself even if your willing to put the time in. It will cost them big bucks too for each case. I don't wish this on anyone though.
Originally posted by: fuzzy bee
Pate said that he never personally downloaded music and that he so zealously respects copyrights that he does not videotape movies off cable television channels.
Whatever.
