Review of 11 Antivirus Software applications

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: tangent1138
i tried panda for a while. i liked it at first, but it turned out sometimes it made my system unstable at startup. the instability went away when i uninstalled. so i guess i'm looking for a new option...

I was trying to evaluate Panda for weeks as a replacement to our firm's av, but I couldn't get it to install. I kill two desktops in the process because the uninstalls weren't clean. I gave up because I couldn't even get to the deployment phase. :eek: Not good when your AV is throwing up DLL and C++ exception errors all over the place.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: MindfuLLOne
I use extendia antivirus, witch is a antivirus program from hell. it uses two engines at once. one that M$ might licence as a future antivirus for windows (RAV) and the kaspersky engine, and it's cheap too.
only draw back is if you do a full system scan using both engines at once (you can disable one or the other) it takes a while> but on the plus side first time i ran it I found 8 virus' that norton 2004 didn't find.

here's a link: http://www.boomerangsoftware.com/

Hey great, an Antivirus I haven't seen before. Adding it to my list...

Extendia Antivirus Support Forum
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: LiLithTecH
Just a curious question.

Whom do you think benefits the most by virus infections?

symantec

The entire Information Security industry. Viruses keep us on our toes, helps to reveal exploits that would otherwise had been used by hackers transparently, and basically gives us a mission (and job security).
 

ThePiston

Senior member
Nov 14, 2004
861
0
76
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
I don't use any virus scan software and have never had a virus.

How about instead of showing people how to continue their horrible computing habits, you dedicate a thread or two to teaching people how to be smart about the interweb.

That's hilarious, it reminds me AL Bundy when he said, "I've never been to the dentist, and I've never had a cavity!"
 

Firus

Senior member
Nov 16, 2001
525
0
0
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
I don't use any virus scan software and have never had a virus.

How about instead of showing people how to continue their horrible computing habits, you dedicate a thread or two to teaching people how to be smart about the interweb.

That is funny...it's almost guaranteed that there will be something on there. Even with a virus scanner installed with up to date defs, I installed a different one and found a virus. Yes, I am smart about the interweb as my job usually consists of cleaning up after people who are not.
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,560
2,898
136
I've been using AVG free ed for 3 years now. Mayby 2 or 3 times I got minor infections. But its my AV of choice because its the least resource/mem hog, esp when I disabled everything except the resident shield, so mem usage gets down to around 1.8mb.

I dont care much if I get infected as I have synchronized OS backups and dual boots that are updated every few days.

They're discontinuing the AVG6 version by end Dec. I tried the AVG7 which is its replacement. Very good! Slightly higher mem usage, but still relatively low. It appears and functions like a higher-price shareware AV.
 

CaptainSpectacular

Senior member
May 9, 2001
375
0
0
just wanted to throw out another vote for testing the corporate editions of these virus scanners (i know McAffee and Norton/Symantec have ones) - the interfaces tended to be MUCH cleaner, much less in your face, etc. Presumably, they use the same scan engines as the equivalent "consumer" versions. The real question would be in terms of speed, memory usage, and things along those lines. besides, lots of us get the corp editions free through school or work :)

just a thought.
 

CaptainSpectacular

Senior member
May 9, 2001
375
0
0
i forgot to mention that the corp editions do not require you to "subscribe" to virus definition updates or have limited licenses or anything like that. just FYI....
 

Wigwam

Senior member
Dec 26, 2002
943
0
0
Originally posted by: CaptainSpectacular
just wanted to throw out another vote for testing the corporate editions of these virus scanners (i know McAffee and Norton/Symantec have ones) - the interfaces tended to be MUCH cleaner, much less in your face, etc. Presumably, they use the same scan engines as the equivalent "consumer" versions. The real question would be in terms of speed, memory usage, and things along those lines. besides, lots of us get the corp editions free through school or work :)

just a thought.



i would be very interested in this too - esp the SAV vs NAV 2005 shootout!
 

Megatomic

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
20,127
6
81
Schadenfroh, have you tried the newest version of eTrust from Computer Associates? It has been overhauled (especially the GUI) recently and your review is now a little out of date. I'd like to see how the newest version of eTrust compares to the competitors, others may as well.
 

imported_FishTaco

Golden Member
Apr 28, 2004
1,120
0
0
Schadenfroh,

In your review of AntiVir, you state that there's no auto update feature that does not require user interaction. However if you use the windows task scheduler to run the task:

"C:\Program Files\AVPersonal\INETUPD.EXE" /UDE /EXP

The update program will run, download, install then close without any user interaction.

You can also use the AntiVir Scheduler to schedule this task. Note, I got the command line parameters to do the automatic update from the AntiVir Scheduler.