Sorry but there is nothing intuitive about clicking on an icon that says "desktop" as a way to switch to a completely different UI.
There's no reason anyone would think they needed two UIs in the first place.
All of you W8 fans could be a lot more helpful if you weren't so dismissive of the people who are confronted with so unintuitive as a non-touch computer defaulting to a touch-centric operating system.
Look at his first post he gives no constructive reasons why ,it seems most of the anti-Win8 campaigners for 98% of the time are just moaning for the sake of it with no constructive feedback and refuse to even try to get use to Win8,let me say I'm not a Windows fan as such,my first PC OS was DOS 6.22 and I will always be a DOS fan and have fond memories of it decades ago,I got use to Windows and the changes after every new Windows release for better or worst,one thing I do know you get some anti-8 campaigners that give honest constructive feedback,then you get others that just troll and give no reasons,I've seen this since Win95 and onwards
You can bet it will not stop at Win8,ie Win9,10 etc.. will get some troll posts and non constructive feedback.
Its one thing to dislike an OS and give constructive feedback rather then stupid no constructive statements.
For the record I only use Windows because of gaming,I still use Linux (great non gaming alternative).
Win8 is not hard to adapt or adjust too,I went into Win8 open minded and took the time to learn it properly for all its strengths and weaknesses.
I don't miss the start button,you really don't need it(I thought it was needed in Win8 beta,but I was wrong after I took the time to use official Win8 without a start menu button).
I understand some people don't like Win8,no OS is perfect but try to give some honest constructive feedback for reasons why after you have taken the time to learn the OS,just remember it works both ways there are plenty of people that do like Win8 as well,we all have different opinions but try to be constructive either way.
For the record the only two Windows operating systems that I did not like was Win3.1 and ME,I won't bore you with the reasons why.
I'll try and answer Tom's first question about UI,it seems to me that Win8 being a hybrid OS this is the way Microsoft wanted to make it ie Desktop and Metro sides which cover most things on most hardware,personally I find it quite natural now(yes I know some will say shock horror) but its only one or two clicks max for me to find or launch anything, now is that hard for me?...hell no,its fast and very stable and I can run all my software/games just fine,easy for me to navigate around as a desktop user,even had a play with Metro side ie making my own columns for games,my software etc....remember I'm a desktop/gamer user with no touchscreen and been using Microsoft since DOS 6.22 days(my favorite OS).
Do note I spend the most time on desktop as well(mainly because I'm a desktop user) but don't mind going to Metro if I need too.
I can use Win8 desktop for about 98- 99% as a desktop OS.
I still think Win9 will still be a hybrid OS with more refinement on Metro side.
I also think Microsoft will be dropping a pure desktop OS for good like XP,Vista,Win7 for a current hybrid OS like Win8 in their future operating systems.
Regardless of the anti-8 and Pro Win8 people here,I'll say I think we will be in for some interesting times when Win9 is released,which way will Microsoft go with regards to layout/UI etc...interesting times ahead and I look forward to Win9,10 like I always do with any new OS.
There you have it my honest feedback.