Research shows that worshipped World War 2 hero orchestrated Genocide

[CanOWorms]

Actually I haven't. I said YOUR reasoning was racist. And not everyone else, JUST YOU.

Do you think that MLK Jr was a racist?

 

[freegeeks]

Do you think that MLK Jr was a racist?

do you think the earth is flat?

 

[CanOWorms]

do you think the earth is flat?

Do you recognize what Hitler did to the Jews?
Do you recognize what the Japanese did in China?
Do you recognize what Stalin did to his very own?
Do you recognize what Churchill did to his colonies?

They all happened in the same era, but why is Churchill given worship status? Is it because of ethnic or racial reasons?

 

[freegeeks]

Do you recognize what Hitler did to the Jews?
Do you recognize what the Japanese did in China?
Do you recognize what Stalin did to his very own?
Do you recognize what Churchill did to his colonies?

They all happened in the same era, but why is Churchill given worship status? Is it because of ethnic or racial reasons?

Yes on all accounts but I still think that you are lunatic. This thread is not about genocide but about your strange obsession that you have demonstrated since you are a member.

You didnt answer my question about the British dude with the big shlong, or was he Italian maybe?

you can PM me if you dont want to confess in public, I will take your secret to the grave, you have my word

 

[CanOWorms]

Yes on all accounts but I still think that you are lunatic. This thread is not about genocide but about your strange obsession that you have demonstrated since you are a member.

Of course this thread is about genocide. It's about Churchill's Bengal Genocide. It's about why it's been forgotten/revisioned/denied. It's a fascinating topic. The book seems like it would be a fascinating read. Perhaps those such as Infohawk would find the historical records revealed to be distressing, but it should still be interesting.

You didnt answer my question about the British dude with the big shlong, or was he Italian maybe?

you can PM me if you dont want to confess in public, I will take your secret to the grave, you have my word

It was an animal actually. A Belgian squirrel.

 

[freegeeks]

Of course this thread is about genocide. It's about Churchill's Bengal Genocide. It's about why it's been forgotten/revisioned/denied. It's a fascinating topic. The book seems like it would be a fascinating read. Perhaps those such as Infohawk would find the historical records revealed to be distressing, but it should still be interesting.



It was an animal actually. A Belgian squirrel.

your lying, there is no such thing as a Belgian squirrel
just PM me the truth, you will feel relieved for opening up

 

[CanOWorms]

your lying, there is no such thing as a Belgian squirrel
just PM me the truth, you will feel relieved for opening up

It happened at a Belgian zoo with a squirrel exhibit.

 

[Infohawk]

Do you think that MLK Jr was a racist?

MLK didn't spew hate like you do. And his arguments were not racist. You're no MLK.

Also your response to my link makes no sense. Honestly, learn more about logical fallacies. It will make you more credible.

 

[CanOWorms]

MLK didn't spew hate like you do. And his arguments were not racist. You're no MLK.

You seem to claim that people are racist when they are making a point against racism. You're also supporting one of the vilest racists of the 20th century and you're trying to minimize one of his most atrocious acts even though it was motivated by racism.

 

[Infohawk]

you can PM me if you dont want to confess in public, I will take your secret to the grave, you have my word

I've often wondered if COW was the victim of discrimination in Europe. But other times his views of Europe (especially compared to the US which is remarkably similar compared to India), make me think he has never been. What do you think? Has COW even been there?

 

[RabidMongoose]

You seem to claim that people are racist when they are making a point against racism. You're also supporting one of the vilest racists of the 20th century and you're trying to minimize one of his most atrocious acts even though it was motivated by racism.

I don't think that these people recognize Churchill's views and motivations as racist, largely because these people probably don't recognize Indians as even human.

 

[Infohawk]

You seem to claim that people are racist when they are making a point against racism. You're also supporting one of the vilest racists of the 20th century and you're trying to minimize one of his most atrocious acts even though it was motivated by racism.

There you go with that circular reasoning again.

 

[CanOWorms]

I've often wondered if COW was the victim of discrimination in Europe. But other times his views of Europe (especially compared to the US which is remarkably similar compared to India), make me think he has never been. What do you think? Has COW even been there?

I've posted several times about it, including several times in response to your questions. Yes, I've been there and yes, I have experienced racism there.

However, being there doesn't provide anything special. It's all anecdotal evidence. That is why I use surveys, articles, research, etc.

 

[freegeeks]

I've often wondered if COW was the victim of discrimination in Europe. But other times his views of Europe (especially compared to the US which is remarkably similar compared to India), make me think he has never been. What do you think? Has COW even been there?

Where else would the British dude with the big shlong has tapped his gf?
so yes, I think he's been in Europe. Apparantly me admitting that some serious horrible stuff happened during colonial rule is not enough. I guess he expects me to cry myself to sleep every night for the stuff my ancestors did

 

[CanOWorms]

I don't think that these people recognize Churchill's views and motivations as racist, largely because these people probably don't recognize Indians as even human.

I think it's that and also Churchill has been historically viewed as some sort of hero because of the glorification of colonialism. People identify with him and many Americans identify culturally with the British even if they don't have British ties (the special relationship). Attacking Churchill makes them uncomfortable. They think they are being attacked personally.

I wonder what these same people think about Obama returning the bust of Churchill because Churchill was in power while British soldiers were mutilating Obama's grandfather's testicles.

 

[freegeeks]

I've posted several times about it, including several times in response to your questions. Yes, I've been there and yes, I have experienced racism there.

However, being there doesn't provide anything special. It's all anecdotal evidence. That is why I use surveys, articles, research, etc.

I'm experiencing racism on this very forum from you. I will go now standing in a corner, crying and blaming the whole world

 

[Infohawk]

I've posted several times about it, including several times in response to your questions. Yes, I've been there and yes, I have experienced racism there.

However, being there doesn't provide anything special. It's all anecdotal evidence. That is why I use surveys, articles, research, etc.

What was the racist incident? I feel bad for you but you shouldn't spend the rest of your life hating Europeans because of that. How would you feel if someone hated Indians because they were once made fun of by an Indian?

 

[Infohawk]

Where else would the British dude with the big shlong has tapped his gf?
so yes, I think he's been in Europe. Apparantly me admitting that some serious horrible stuff happened during colonial rule is not enough. I guess he expects me to cry myself to sleep every night for the stuff my ancestors did

Not only does he want you to cry about your ancestors, but he also seems to have a pretty idealistic picture about his own ancestors. There's critical thinking for you.

 

[freegeeks]

I think it's that and also Churchill has been historically viewed as some sort of hero because of the glorification of colonialism. People identify with him and many Americans identify culturally with the British even if they don't have British ties (the special relationship). Attacking Churchill makes them uncomfortable. They think they are being attacked personally.

I wonder what these same people think about Obama returning the bust of Churchill because Churchill was in power while British soldiers were mutilating Obama's grandfather's testicles.

Churchill is viewed as a hero for his leadership during WWII but I guess it's too difficult for your peanut brain to understand that maybe he could have been a great leader and a sorry sob at the same time

 

[CanOWorms]

What was the racist incident? I feel bad for you but you shouldn't spend the rest of your life hating Europeans because of that.

As I've said many times, that incident didn't cause me to hate anyone. It caused me to look into issues on why it happened. That is when I started researching European issues. Researching these issues caused me to hate their governments and histories, very similarly to how many of them hate the American government but don't hate all Americans.

How would you feel if someone hated Indians because they were once made fun of by an Indian?

Did that happen to you? Is that why you think it's ok to slaughter millions of people? I wonder if that's why you're excusing Churchill's genocide.

 

[RabidMongoose]

I think it's that and also Churchill has been historically viewed as some sort of hero because of the glorification of colonialism. People identify with him and many Americans identify culturally with the British even if they don't have British ties (the special relationship). Attacking Churchill makes them uncomfortable. They think they are being attacked personally.

I wonder what these same people think about Obama returning the bust of Churchill because Churchill was in power while British soldiers were mutilating Obama's grandfather's testicles.

Hmm, that makes sense. I suppose this is why even we in the US don't fully learn about the horrors of European bloodthirst against the rest of the world. Weird thing is that our schools teach about American atrocities, Japanese during WW2, etc. but they don't really seem to cover the bloodbath that the British Empire inflicted upon the entire world.

 

[CanOWorms]

..

 

[CanOWorms]

Hmm, that makes sense. I suppose this is why even we in the US don't fully learn about the horrors of European bloodthirst against the rest of the world. Weird thing is that our schools teach about American atrocities, Japanese during WW2, etc. but they don't really seem to cover the bloodbath that the British Empire inflicted upon the entire world.

I think that it will change as demographics change and other countries and regions become more predominant in the world.

The focus of WW2 is going to shift from primarily being about Europe to include more about Asia.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Did that happen to you? Is that why you think it's ok to slaughter millions of people? I wonder if that's why you're excusing Churchill's genocide.

No, he thinks it's OK to slaughter millions of people if the country already has a high birthrate.

Along the same lines, it's OK to murder one child in a family if the family is expecting twins. The family is growing anyways!

 

[CanOWorms]

Not only does he want you to cry about your ancestors, but he also seems to have a pretty idealistic picture about his own ancestors. There's critical thinking for you.

I have an idealistic view of people because I oppose their eradication?