Research shows that worshipped World War 2 hero orchestrated Genocide

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Imagine that, Churchill put Britain first during a time of full scale world war and impending invasion by a foreign power. OH NOES!!!

Seems like a good time to murder a bunch of filthy brown people, right?

I wonder if British schools teach their children about the horrors of British imperial bloodthirst...
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
War is hell!

I dont believe it is a good thing to starve people to death. Maybe the British mistreated lots of people living in colonial areas.

Remember that the British were almost bombed to death by Germany. Bombs fell from the sky killing many innocent civilians. You have to see this in the light of reality.

During WWII the USA dropped Napalm burning many Japanese homes. It was a crude napalm, but it would still burn down existing structures. When you are fighting people who want you dead, you just need to do what is necessary. We have not had to fight a real war in a long time so you probably cant fathom what it is like. The USA has very seldom fought our enemies on our own soil. The last time this occurred in a real way is during the revolutionary war.

During war food sometimes gets scarce. Maybe they knew they would have to give up their territory and be overrun so they left no food for the Japanese. The Japanese would have stolen all the natives food and starved them to death. That is what the Japanese did in China and that is what the Japanese did in Korea. This must have been a tough decision to make. The Japanese were ruthless animals. They fed candy laced with opium to children and made toys that blew up. Never forget the brutality of the Japanese.
 
Last edited:

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
War is hell!

Remember that the British were almost bombed to death by Germany. Bombs fell from the sky killing many innocent civilians. You have to see this in the light of reality.

During WWII the USA dropped Napalm burning many Japanese homes. It was a crude napalm, but it would still burn down existing structures. When you are fighting people who want you dead, you just need to do what is necessary. We have not had to fight a real war in a long time so you probably cant fathom what it is like. The USA has very seldom fought our enemies on our own soil. The last time this occurred in a real way is during the revolutionary war.

During war food sometimes gets scarce. Maybe they knew they would have to give up their territory and be overrun so they left no food for the Japanese. The Japanese would have stolen all the natives food and starved them to death. That is what the Japanese did in China and that is what the Japanese did in Korea. This must have been a tough decision to make. The Japanese were ruthless animals. They fed candy laced with opium to children and made toys that blew up. Never forget the brutality of the Japanese.

This ^

While I wouldn't consider Churchill a saint by any stretch of the imagination, I know he had some tough choices to make. Hindsight being 20/20 he could have made much better choices in some situations, just like we all make mistakes or less than optimal choices in life. Just remember, Churchill did not instigate any of that mess. If there had been no war, none of that would have occurred.
 

cirrrocco

Golden Member
Sep 7, 2004
1,952
78
91
War is hell!

I dont believe it is a good thing to starve people to death. Maybe the British mistreated lots of people living in colonial areas.

Remember that the British were almost bombed to death by Germany. Bombs fell from the sky killing many innocent civilians. You have to see this in the light of reality.

During WWII the USA dropped Napalm burning many Japanese homes. It was a crude napalm, but it would still burn down existing structures. When you are fighting people who want you dead, you just need to do what is necessary. We have not had to fight a real war in a long time so you probably cant fathom what it is like. The USA has very seldom fought our enemies on our own soil. The last time this occurred in a real way is during the revolutionary war.

During war food sometimes gets scarce. Maybe they knew they would have to give up their territory and be overrun so they left no food for the Japanese. The Japanese would have stolen all the natives food and starved them to death. That is what the Japanese did in China and that is what the Japanese did in Korea. This must have been a tough decision to make. The Japanese were ruthless animals. They fed candy laced with opium to children and made toys that blew up. Never forget the brutality of the Japanese.


so why didn't churchill starve the british islands when the Germans were about to invade. That way the Germans wont have any food and the battle of Britain could have been averted.
I am not disputing your argument and I also agree there were hard choice, but India and Britain were not at war and yet he willingly killed a bunch of brown people. fuckin imperialists.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
so why didn't churchill starve the british islands when the Germans were about to invade. That way the Germans wont have any food and the battle of Britain could have been averted.
I am not disputing your argument and I also agree there were hard choice, but India and Britain were not at war and yet he willingly killed a bunch of brown people. fuckin imperialists.

Have you ever heard of the Channel? The Germans didn't invade because of it.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
so why didn't churchill starve the british islands when the Germans were about to invade. That way the Germans wont have any food and the battle of Britain could have been averted.
I am not disputing your argument and I also agree there were hard choice, but India and Britain were not at war and yet he willingly killed a bunch of brown people. fuckin imperialists.

Because he is not a representative of India. You take care of your own before taking care beyond that if it is within your means. Looking back we can conclude he could have helped out India, but viewing history through hindsight allows one to see things that people at the time could not. I agree it was a bad mistake on his part. I agree he might have even let it happened because he was a bit racist and biased. But he never went out of his way to kill people in India.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
guys and gals, you are trying to have a discussion with lunatic Canoworms and his sidekick RabidMongoose. He starts these kinds of threads all the time and if you don't 200% agree with their point of view, then they label you as a racist. This stuff has been going on for years, just do a search on his posts. They both have some weird obsession about Europe. The funny thing is that Canoworms has Indian roots and he still chooses to study and live in the equally evil country of the USA (atrocities against the Indians for example). It's not the first time that I see this kind of mentality, they glorify their "home" country as heaven on earth but when they have the chance, they will have a one-way plane ticket to one of those "evil" countries. I guess it must not be so bad here (USA or Europe) after all.....
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
There is no way that the USA is 'equally evil' as European death machines. The British Empire is probably the worst thing that ever happened to humanity.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
guys and gals, you are trying to have a discussion with lunatic Canoworms and his sidekick RabidMongoose. He starts these kinds of threads all the time and if you don't 200% agree with their point of view, then they label you as a racist. This stuff has been going on for years, just do a search on his posts. They both have some weird obsession about Europe. The funny thing is that Canoworms has Indian roots and he still chooses to study and live in the equally evil country of the USA (atrocities against the Indians for example). It's not the first time that I see this kind of mentality, they glorify their "home" country as heaven on earth but when they have the chance, they will have a one-way plane ticket to one of those "evil" countries. I guess it must not be so bad here (USA or Europe) after all.....

COW has admitted to Indian roots?
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
COW has admitted to Indian roots?

I think so, at least if I remember correctly from a thread from some time ago

I have to be carefull to say "roots" because if I say "he's Indian", he will label me as racist with his punch line "are you saying that I'm not a true American because I'm brown" or something like that
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I think that he is of Indian descent. As I recall correctly, europeans here once went insane that some 'dirty brown' person dared to speak out against european atrocities. They feel that someone of Indian descent shouldn't get out of line, as you can see from freegeek's post.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
I think that he is of Indian descent. As I recall correctly, europeans here once went insane that some 'dirty brown' person dared to speak out against european atrocities. They feel that someone of Indian descent shouldn't get out of line, as you can see from freegeek's post.

LOL, you see, you don't agree with all of their stuff, you are a racist
both of you are so predictable
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I think so, at least if I remember correctly from a thread from some time ago

I have to be carefull to say "roots" because if I say "he's Indian", he will label me as racist with his punch line "are you saying that I'm not a true American because I'm brown" or something like that

Well it makes perfect sense. He's obviously got some personal baggage to deal with.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I think that he is of Indian descent. As I recall correctly, europeans here once went insane that some 'dirty brown' person dared to speak out against european atrocities. They feel that someone of Indian descent shouldn't get out of line, as you can see from freegeek's post.

Do you hate all white people or just European ones?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Do you hate all white people or just European ones?

First, why are you asking if I would hate myself? Weird.

Second, I don't particularly hate Europeans, just Europeans with a freegeeks type of mentality, one full of racism and looks down on former colonial slaves.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
I agree. these dirty brown people all have personal baggage to deal with...because, you know, they're brown.

both of you certainly have some bagage to deal with and it has nothing to do with the colour of your skin. You are both lunatics in need of mental help
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
LOL, you see, you don't agree with all of their stuff, you are a racist
both of you are so predictable

You're predictable, too, with your whole thing about how dirty brown people can't criticize the holy europeans. You've been like this for years.

You have a pretty disgusting outlook on the world.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
First, why are you asking if I would hate myself? Weird.

Second, I don't particularly hate Europeans, just Europeans with a freegeeks type of mentality, one full of racism and looks down on former colonial slaves.

Lots of people are self-hating. Ask Moonbeam. But good job, you dodged the question.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
First, why are you asking if I would hate myself? Weird.

Second, I don't particularly hate Europeans, just Europeans with a freegeeks type of mentality, one full of racism and looks down on former colonial slaves.

where did I post anything racist?
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
You're predictable, too, with your whole thing about how dirty brown people can't criticize the holy europeans. You've been like this for years.

You have a pretty disgusting outlook on the world.

you are using the hate words, not me

have a look in the mirror buddy
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
where did I post anything racist?

Dude you just got trolled by the troll you warned everyone else about! He's hooked you! :)

But honestly sometimes its fun to exchange words with these batshit-crazy loons because you'll get gems like COW's idea to have the US make a military strike on Big Ben in London as retribution for the BP spill.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Dude you just got trolled by the troll you warned everyone else about! He's hooked you! :)

But honestly sometimes its fun to exchange words with these batshit-crazy loons because you'll get gems like COW's idea to have the US make a military strike on Big Ben in London as retribution for the BP spill.

hehe, I actually enjoy once in a while these kind of "discussions" with mentally retarded dudes like COW and Rabid, you just have to descend to their level of reasoning which is the hardest thing because the word low can not even describe it :)
 
Last edited:

cirrrocco

Golden Member
Sep 7, 2004
1,952
78
91
Have you ever heard of the Channel? The Germans didn't invade because of it.


have you heard of Burma. There is no fucking way the japanese could have brought in their artillery and heavy weapons through the maze of forests, swamps and rivers and attacked India, yet that fucker Churchill bought all the food from the market, shipped all the food to the UK that was produced in Bengal [It was a bumper harvest that year] and yet 4 million people died according t British estimates.

just fyi, the germans built massive barges and were ready to Invade when they reduced the RAF to dust. The dumbass Hitler made Goerring shift to attacking cities instead of RAF airfields. you dont know your history. Go read a basic WW2 history book.