berzerker60
Golden Member
- Jul 18, 2012
- 1,233
- 1
- 0
I'm sorry, but your thoughts regarding the UAW are very naïve. The UAW is not a democracy, it's run like a dictatorship. If the International offices of the UAW based in Detroit want a plant to strike, that plant will strike. A vote will be held, but the workforce will be wound up by the guys from Detroit until they're convinced they want to strike. And guess who counts the votes? If the vote count doesn't come out the way they want it, they'll make it come out the way they want it. (And I have a story to back this up too.) The head of the UAW is appointed in a sham election process. Delegates to the convention that elect the top dog are separated when they arrive into groups, are taken into closed rooms and are told for whom to cast their vote. They are told the consequence of not complying.
A strike can be used to affect an operation hundreds or thousands of miles away and even in another country. You've got a key plant that supplies a component that keeps four other plants running and you're trying to get concessions from the company, you put out the plant that makes that component. Those people walk the picket line, taking it in the ass to get something for another group of people that might not even work for the same company.
A portion of the dues paid go to UAW HQ in Detroit. How would those people get paid? How would they afford the costs of the building they operate from? A portion of union dues go to support candidates that the poor schmuck at the bottom of the ladder might not support. Every election we would get the list of 'endorsed' candidates we should vote for.
I could go on and on with this.
I don't pretend to know the full story of UAW politics down the line, but I was a UAW member as a grad student in the UC system, and they never had shit to do with us. If you seriously think people can just be "wound up to vote" however someone wants with no problem, you don't have any faith in democracy to start with, so there's not a lot to be gained by democratic institutions, no. I also don't really care who runs the UAW, because it never impacted us. I just know the union was sometimes a pain in the ass, but left us WAY better off than non-union grad students around the country in lots of ways.
Of course, my anecdote certainly doesn't speak to what has to be the case in Tennessee. I'm just saying I'd be surprised if the locals couldn't work out a deal where it's called UAW but really in name only. If that's wrong, then I'm all for a local union. I care about them being unionized, don't care one bit how that happens.
Last edited: