• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Republican Biblethumpers. Explain Anti Abortion,Anticontraception, Antiwelfare stance

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
MotF Bane said:
Pay no heed to that pesky Bill of Rights. D:

.
Click to expand...

No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
 
Last edited:
Ausm said:
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
Click to expand...

Not that you care but I was going to have to come over and spill your beer. 😛
 
Ausm said:
I agree that Religion should be banned yes....
Click to expand...

Your true colors come shining through. We now see you do not support the US Constitution. I am surprised you would so eagerly announce it.

Ausm said:
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
Click to expand...

Nope, you cannot backpedal out of it now that you realized you posted something you should not have admitted to believing. Too late.
 
Ausm said:
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
Click to expand...

Didn't your momma teach you that life just isn't fair? Too bad. Religion isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
 
Ausm said:
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
Click to expand...

For the left, government IS religion.
 
cybrsage said:
Your true colors come shining through. We now see you do not support the US Constitution. I am surprised you would so eagerly announce it.



Nope, you cannot backpedal out of it now that you realized you posted something you should not have admitted to believing. Too late.
Click to expand...

Oh brother....I need to put on my hip waders the shit is getting deep in here. Hit the road RepubliTroll.
 
Last edited:
Hugo Drax said:
Okay so you dont want people to have sex unless they are married.
You dont want people to use condoms if they have sex
You dont want women to take contraceptives
You dont want women to have the right for abortion.

Yet you are pro death penalty.
And you are anti Welfare,foodstamps.

But if you want people to have a baby everytime they have sex why are you against then helping the baby eat and get food if the parents are not working?

So what gives? IF you want to see less folks in the ghetto pushing out babies like its going out of style and collecting welfare/food stamps why wont you be for anything that helps curtail the population of the Ghetto folks and the Trailerpark folks? Or anyone that could potential increase the amount of government aid collected.
Click to expand...

The ability to believe several contradictory and impossible things at once?
 
Ausm said:
Yeah because you keep brainwashing each upcoming generation.
Click to expand...

It's your Yin to my Yang. You brainwash, I brainwash, we all brainwash.

It should be pretty simple. A churches community > faux tolerant views. Community draws people there, while the later doesn't draw anything except angry nobodies to an internet forum.
 
brandonb said:
It's your Yin to my Yang. You brainwash, I brainwash, we all brainwash.

It should be pretty simple. A churches community > faux tolerant views. Community draws people there, while the later doesn't draw anything except angry nobodies to an internet forum.
Click to expand...

I can see your first point but I respectfully disagree with your second point.
 
Mursilis said:
But he's still spectacularly, stupidly wrong. Many of the most prominent critics of the death penalty are religious, such as the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Back when Clinton was reforming welfare, they also opposed most of those cuts, and they've endorsed universal health care, too. This thread is just stupid.
Click to expand...

Catholics are not usually associated with being "Bible Thumpers". That's usually various Evangelical sects.
 
My wife had a baby and I didnt get no welfare money, so why should some slut get paid for sleeping around and having babies? I believe in equal treatment under the law.

Is this plain english enough for you?????
 
piasabird said:
My wife had a baby and I didnt get no welfare money, so why should some slut get paid for sleeping around and having babies? I believe in equal treatment under the law.

Is this plain english enough for you?????
Click to expand...

Then you will deal with an uneducated and crime ridden society as a result, which will also hurt your business/job as well.
 
I'm all for liberals taking contraceptives and having abortions as it means there will be less liberals in generations to come.

Also welfare recipients should be required to take contraceptives or given free abortions.
 
Hugo Drax said:
Okay so you dont want people to have sex unless they are married.
You dont want people to use condoms if they have sex
You dont want women to take contraceptives
You dont want women to have the right for abortion.

Yet you are pro death penalty.
And you are anti Welfare,foodstamps.

But if you want people to have a baby everytime they have sex why are you against then helping the baby eat and get food if the parents are not working?

So what gives? IF you want to see less folks in the ghetto pushing out babies like its going out of style and collecting welfare/food stamps why wont you be for anything that helps curtail the population of the Ghetto folks and the Trailerpark folks? Or anyone that could potential increase the amount of government aid collected.
Click to expand...

Simple. It's about punishing women for engaging in what is perceived as immoral sexual behavior. It's the "if you do the crime, do the time" argument, where if the woman makes the choice to and presumably enjoys sex, she has to face the consequence of either raising a child or having to give it up for adoption. (Hence the exceptions for cases of rape or incest, where she presumably did not choose to have sex and nor did she presumably enjoy the act.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top