Republican Biblethumpers. Explain Anti Abortion,Anticontraception, Antiwelfare stance

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Pay no heed to that pesky Bill of Rights. D:

.

No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.
 
Last edited:

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.

Not that you care but I was going to have to come over and spill your beer. :p
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
I agree that Religion should be banned yes....

Your true colors come shining through. We now see you do not support the US Constitution. I am surprised you would so eagerly announce it.

No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.

Nope, you cannot backpedal out of it now that you realized you posted something you should not have admitted to believing. Too late.
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.

Didn't your momma teach you that life just isn't fair? Too bad. Religion isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
No need to worry just replying to a RepubliTroll. In reality, I think everyone has the right to practice Religion or to be free from Religion. I also believe that Religion should have no purpose in Gubermint.

For the left, government IS religion.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Your true colors come shining through. We now see you do not support the US Constitution. I am surprised you would so eagerly announce it.



Nope, you cannot backpedal out of it now that you realized you posted something you should not have admitted to believing. Too late.

Oh brother....I need to put on my hip waders the shit is getting deep in here. Hit the road RepubliTroll.
 
Last edited:

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Okay so you dont want people to have sex unless they are married.
You dont want people to use condoms if they have sex
You dont want women to take contraceptives
You dont want women to have the right for abortion.

Yet you are pro death penalty.
And you are anti Welfare,foodstamps.

But if you want people to have a baby everytime they have sex why are you against then helping the baby eat and get food if the parents are not working?

So what gives? IF you want to see less folks in the ghetto pushing out babies like its going out of style and collecting welfare/food stamps why wont you be for anything that helps curtail the population of the Ghetto folks and the Trailerpark folks? Or anyone that could potential increase the amount of government aid collected.

The ability to believe several contradictory and impossible things at once?
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
Yeah because you keep brainwashing each upcoming generation.

It's your Yin to my Yang. You brainwash, I brainwash, we all brainwash.

It should be pretty simple. A churches community > faux tolerant views. Community draws people there, while the later doesn't draw anything except angry nobodies to an internet forum.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
It's your Yin to my Yang. You brainwash, I brainwash, we all brainwash.

It should be pretty simple. A churches community > faux tolerant views. Community draws people there, while the later doesn't draw anything except angry nobodies to an internet forum.

I can see your first point but I respectfully disagree with your second point.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,215
5,794
126
But he's still spectacularly, stupidly wrong. Many of the most prominent critics of the death penalty are religious, such as the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Back when Clinton was reforming welfare, they also opposed most of those cuts, and they've endorsed universal health care, too. This thread is just stupid.

Catholics are not usually associated with being "Bible Thumpers". That's usually various Evangelical sects.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
My wife had a baby and I didnt get no welfare money, so why should some slut get paid for sleeping around and having babies? I believe in equal treatment under the law.

Is this plain english enough for you?????
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
My wife had a baby and I didnt get no welfare money, so why should some slut get paid for sleeping around and having babies? I believe in equal treatment under the law.

Is this plain english enough for you?????

Then you will deal with an uneducated and crime ridden society as a result, which will also hurt your business/job as well.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
I'm all for liberals taking contraceptives and having abortions as it means there will be less liberals in generations to come.

Also welfare recipients should be required to take contraceptives or given free abortions.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,503
50,662
136
I'm all for liberals taking contraceptives and having abortions as it means there will be less liberals in generations to come.

Also welfare recipients should be required to take contraceptives or given free abortions.

Creepy.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
15
81
Okay so you dont want people to have sex unless they are married.
You dont want people to use condoms if they have sex
You dont want women to take contraceptives
You dont want women to have the right for abortion.

Yet you are pro death penalty.
And you are anti Welfare,foodstamps.

But if you want people to have a baby everytime they have sex why are you against then helping the baby eat and get food if the parents are not working?

So what gives? IF you want to see less folks in the ghetto pushing out babies like its going out of style and collecting welfare/food stamps why wont you be for anything that helps curtail the population of the Ghetto folks and the Trailerpark folks? Or anyone that could potential increase the amount of government aid collected.

Simple. It's about punishing women for engaging in what is perceived as immoral sexual behavior. It's the "if you do the crime, do the time" argument, where if the woman makes the choice to and presumably enjoys sex, she has to face the consequence of either raising a child or having to give it up for adoption. (Hence the exceptions for cases of rape or incest, where she presumably did not choose to have sex and nor did she presumably enjoy the act.)
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
I love this mischaracterization.
It has NOTHING to do with limiting access rather who pays for it.