Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
you both are obessed with changing each others mind.
I'm not trying to change his mind at all. He can, and will, believe what he wants to, even if it goes against......everything else (i.e. IBM just as an example). Yes, I've argued with him, but only to show the faults in his reasoning. Whether or not his mind becomes changed by that doesn't matter to me.
Originally posted by: beggerking
OMG, it doesn't exist and it doesn't mean anything. Face it, you made a mistake so let it be a mistake. its NOT "driver path", its "DATA PATH".
I admitted to making the mistake and am not debating that. I agree, I didn't mean to use the term, "Driver Path" even if it does exist. What I meant by it has been clarified in the appropriate thread. All I'm saying now is that you were lying when you said there is no such thing.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
please take it to PM's so we don't have to see ANYMORE of nursery school.
What do you think I was wanting to do near the begining of this thread? I knew that 0% of the material beggerking was wanting to discuss with me concerned anyone else nor had grounds for being in this thread, yet others thought otherwise:
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Plus, this thread is the appropriate place to discuss this, and by discussing it in public it allows others to voice their opinion on the subject.
But....sorry I guess.
In my original post here I basically said that you can't keep everyone and anyone from fighting and that there should at least be some set of rules that everyone can view right on hand to see whether or not someone is being out of line. I still think that, and I know others wouldn't mind it, many other forums have them and it is a common rule among them that if they are broken there will be consequences. The problem here is that some people have to find out what those rules are the hard way and therefore leads to some fights.
Quoting,
verbatim, in a signature is not by any means over-the-top. I agree that it is not the most neutral way to post, but if someone is going to snap at the drop of a pin about it and not try to fix it correctly, then there is a bigger problem than the sig itself, especially if the quotes are nothing but reflections of that person's own recklessness. If you say stupid things, everyone reserves the right to hold you to them. If someone were to do so with my quotes (yes, beggerking, my
verbatim quotes) I would not object.
It's not like I'm drunk and swinging a sword at everyone. In fact, I've mostly been arguing with beggerking (even though I offered for it to be done privately or in another thread) who was the first one to bring up that data/driver crap back on second page. Everything else has been brief visitations from apoppin, Wreckage and Joker, and keys going at it, the OP losing his own thread/mind and becoming Golem, two guys talking about tridents FTW!! constantly, and many other random people inputting a lot about company fanboys which actually haven't reall been an issue in here or at least isn't what so many are tired of hearing. And lets not forget the poor few who seem to be forced to veiw this thread as well as reply to it.
Really, this thread has just furthered my disbelief in Video. It's not like I haven't ever tried to stop crap like this from happening. This doesn't mean that anyone who starts getting apprehensive is going to get an immediate vacation/ban vote from me. (Really, I think its stupid how people try to ban others to begin with, except shills). People fight, don't take it so hard. It
is just a forum.) Even beggerking isn't "under my skin".
Facebook
Twitter