busmaster11
Platinum Member
...or atleast thats what it seems like to me.
I'm a Christian. I don't always follow what the Bible tells me - far from it. I know when I do something inappropriate though. Here's my question.
A lot of people refuse to believe in God because they observe believers doing immoral things that are just as bad or worse than what they, the supposed heathen, might do. They see believers as hypocrites, going to Church on Sunday and then smoking, drinking, taking drugs, being promiscuous, or worse, all the other times. And nobody's drawn to a God of hypocrites...
Still, other people refuse to believe in God because they can't see a compromise between its inherent restrictions and living the morally loose lifestyle they demand. They think anyone who volunteerily chose to restrict themselves from all the decadence is immeasurably assinine.
I'm not trying to convert anyone here... I just want to raise a point. See if my logic breaks down in this example. I say that I'm a Christian. The Bible says homosexuality is wrong. In accordance with my first premise, I would be obligated to agree that its wrong, but stress that I hold no ill feelings against anyone, just the act, - as similiar to the act of stealing or cursing or beating someone. (The truth is, if people are nice and genuine, I'll treat them like brothers no matter their sexual prefence.)
If knowing this, I am criticized for my stance, are you not also criticizing Christianity? Some people would say they're not criticizing Christianity - they're criticizing the fundamentalist views - which is another way of saying Christians should not follow the Bible to the letter.
My point is - to some people I'm either a fundamentalist whose not in touch with society, or I'm a hypocrite.
I believe it is a self-defense mechanism for some people so they never have to give Christianity a fair chance.
I'm a Christian. I don't always follow what the Bible tells me - far from it. I know when I do something inappropriate though. Here's my question.
A lot of people refuse to believe in God because they observe believers doing immoral things that are just as bad or worse than what they, the supposed heathen, might do. They see believers as hypocrites, going to Church on Sunday and then smoking, drinking, taking drugs, being promiscuous, or worse, all the other times. And nobody's drawn to a God of hypocrites...
Still, other people refuse to believe in God because they can't see a compromise between its inherent restrictions and living the morally loose lifestyle they demand. They think anyone who volunteerily chose to restrict themselves from all the decadence is immeasurably assinine.
I'm not trying to convert anyone here... I just want to raise a point. See if my logic breaks down in this example. I say that I'm a Christian. The Bible says homosexuality is wrong. In accordance with my first premise, I would be obligated to agree that its wrong, but stress that I hold no ill feelings against anyone, just the act, - as similiar to the act of stealing or cursing or beating someone. (The truth is, if people are nice and genuine, I'll treat them like brothers no matter their sexual prefence.)
If knowing this, I am criticized for my stance, are you not also criticizing Christianity? Some people would say they're not criticizing Christianity - they're criticizing the fundamentalist views - which is another way of saying Christians should not follow the Bible to the letter.
My point is - to some people I'm either a fundamentalist whose not in touch with society, or I'm a hypocrite.
I believe it is a self-defense mechanism for some people so they never have to give Christianity a fair chance.