Religion

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
wasnt the bible written 500 years after jeebus died?

How much do you and i know what happened 500 years ago?.....

How can the bible therefore be accurate?

FAIL. No one person or group sat down and simply wrote the bible. They were written individually by many different Christian communities, at varying times after Jesus died. Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon. This part is pretty well backed up by historical evidence, including the very same councils that were called to do just that. As per historical accuracy, that part can be debated, but we do still know quite a lot from other sources, namely the official Roman/Hebrew records...

So by your logic it would be completly inaccurate! And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

Religion is the source of all evil in the world, watch the evening news and you will find evidence of this.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
wasnt the bible written 500 years after jeebus died?

How much do you and i know what happened 500 years ago?.....

How can the bible therefore be accurate?

FAIL. No one person or group sat down and simply wrote the bible. They were written individually by many different Christian communities, at varying times after Jesus died. Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon. This part is pretty well backed up by historical evidence, including the very same councils that were called to do just that. As per historical accuracy, that part can be debated, but we do still know quite a lot from other sources, namely the official Roman/Hebrew records...

So by your logic it would be completly inaccurate! And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

Religion is the source of all evil in the world, watch the evening news and you will find evidence of this.

Really? Is that all you've got? Perhaps you don't understand basic historical methodology. By your 'logic', anything that happened before those still alive today is completely unknowable. The information I cited is based in this methodology. There are a myriad of primary and secondary sources that back this up in addition to the traditions that have been passed down since these times in history.

You bring up choir boys, but the only thing you succeed in proving with that snippet is your own ignorance. No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

The source of all evil in the world? Where do you even get a concept of evil? Thats right, culture, as originally put forth with religion. But lets just ignore that. What are the source of evil in the world? Lets see....greed, selfishness, hatred, ignorance, jealousy, etc. etc. etc. - things that religion pretty strongly advocates against.
 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
wasnt the bible written 500 years after jeebus died?

How much do you and i know what happened 500 years ago?.....

How can the bible therefore be accurate?

FAIL. No one person or group sat down and simply wrote the bible. They were written individually by many different Christian communities, at varying times after Jesus died. Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon. This part is pretty well backed up by historical evidence, including the very same councils that were called to do just that. As per historical accuracy, that part can be debated, but we do still know quite a lot from other sources, namely the official Roman/Hebrew records...

So by your logic it would be completly inaccurate! And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

Religion is the source of all evil in the world, watch the evening news and you will find evidence of this.

Really? Is that all you've got? Perhaps you don't understand basic historical methodology. By your 'logic', anything that happened before those still alive today is completely unknowable. The information I cited is based in this methodology. There are a myriad of primary and secondary sources that back this up in addition to the traditions that have been passed down since these times in history.

You bring up choir boys, but the only thing you succeed in proving with that snippet is your own ignorance. No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

The source of all evil in the world? Where do you even get a concept of evil? Thats right, culture, as originally put forth with religion. But lets just ignore that. What are the source of evil in the world? Lets see....greed, selfishness, hatred, ignorance, jealousy, etc. etc. etc. - things that religion pretty strongly advocates against.

Ok ....

You realise that the nation that wins the war... writes the text books... What i mean is, that imagine if the nazis won the war, how would they write the history books? Same goes with all history. History books get rewritten all the time, as new evidence surfaces etc. And in jeebuses time they usually passed on stories verbally as not many people could write in those days. And we have all have heard of the concept of chinese whispers.

As for trouser snakes... my year 8 english teacher who was also the local churches priest was charged tried and sent to prison for fucking little boys. (NOT ME, so dont bother with the jokes)

I like the underlying message that religion puts out.. be kind to one another etc i like some of the stories of the old testament, ie the good samaratan. That is one story that stuck in my mind during religion class. But then again... i can be kind to others without religion. Example: One of the guys in my class failed his electronics exam i gave my lunch time to get his study method fixed. I didnt need to give money to church for that.

Unfortunatley its the people that use the church for their own personal gain that makes me fucking hate religion.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
wasnt the bible written 500 years after jeebus died?

How much do you and i know what happened 500 years ago?.....

How can the bible therefore be accurate?

FAIL. No one person or group sat down and simply wrote the bible. They were written individually by many different Christian communities, at varying times after Jesus died. Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon. This part is pretty well backed up by historical evidence, including the very same councils that were called to do just that. As per historical accuracy, that part can be debated, but we do still know quite a lot from other sources, namely the official Roman/Hebrew records...

So by your logic it would be completly inaccurate! And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

Religion is the source of all evil in the world, watch the evening news and you will find evidence of this.

Really? Is that all you've got? Perhaps you don't understand basic historical methodology. By your 'logic', anything that happened before those still alive today is completely unknowable. The information I cited is based in this methodology. There are a myriad of primary and secondary sources that back this up in addition to the traditions that have been passed down since these times in history.

You bring up choir boys, but the only thing you succeed in proving with that snippet is your own ignorance. No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

The source of all evil in the world? Where do you even get a concept of evil? Thats right, culture, as originally put forth with religion. But lets just ignore that. What are the source of evil in the world? Lets see....greed, selfishness, hatred, ignorance, jealousy, etc. etc. etc. - things that religion pretty strongly advocates against.

Ok ....

You realise that the nation that wins the war... writes the text books... What i mean is, that imagine if the nazis won the war, how would they write the history books? Same goes with all history. History books get rewritten all the time, as new evidence surfaces etc. And in jeebuses time they usually passed on stories verbally as not many people could write in those days. And we have all have heard of the concept of chinese whispers.

As for trouser snakes... my year 8 english teacher who was also the local churches priest was charged tried and sent to prison for fucking little boys. (NOT ME, so dont bother with the jokes)

I like the underlying message that religion puts out.. be kind to one another etc i like some of the stories of the old testament, ie the good samaratan. That is one story that stuck in my mind during religion class. But then again... i can be kind to others without religion. Example: One of the guys in my class failed his electronics exam i gave my lunch time to get his study method fixed. I didnt need to give money to church for that.

Unfortunatley its the people that use the church for their own personal gain that makes me fucking hate religion.

Well, although you do make a good point about the victors writing history, that doesn't always apply as it isn't the correct analogy to use. In this case, we have the actual records from the council meetings, in addition to numerous writings of those in attendance including those who had views that did not get adopted in the councils. Besides, these guys were all Romans during a time when the empire was still quite strong. Literacy was a non-issue among the attendees, and amongst the many theologians of the time.

As far as the rest of your post, I can agree with you on points. You don't necessarily need religion to be moral, but that is a matter of philosophy and not specifically religion. There are those within organized religion that hide behind that veil to do unspeakable things, but that is no reason to dismiss the underlying tenants of any religion...that anger should be rightfully directed not on religion itself, but on those that committed those acts and/or allowed them to happen through inaction (usually by means of beurocracy).
 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
wasnt the bible written 500 years after jeebus died?

How much do you and i know what happened 500 years ago?.....

How can the bible therefore be accurate?

FAIL. No one person or group sat down and simply wrote the bible. They were written individually by many different Christian communities, at varying times after Jesus died. Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon. This part is pretty well backed up by historical evidence, including the very same councils that were called to do just that. As per historical accuracy, that part can be debated, but we do still know quite a lot from other sources, namely the official Roman/Hebrew records...

So by your logic it would be completly inaccurate! And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

Religion is the source of all evil in the world, watch the evening news and you will find evidence of this.

Really? Is that all you've got? Perhaps you don't understand basic historical methodology. By your 'logic', anything that happened before those still alive today is completely unknowable. The information I cited is based in this methodology. There are a myriad of primary and secondary sources that back this up in addition to the traditions that have been passed down since these times in history.

You bring up choir boys, but the only thing you succeed in proving with that snippet is your own ignorance. No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

The source of all evil in the world? Where do you even get a concept of evil? Thats right, culture, as originally put forth with religion. But lets just ignore that. What are the source of evil in the world? Lets see....greed, selfishness, hatred, ignorance, jealousy, etc. etc. etc. - things that religion pretty strongly advocates against.

Ok ....

You realise that the nation that wins the war... writes the text books... What i mean is, that imagine if the nazis won the war, how would they write the history books? Same goes with all history. History books get rewritten all the time, as new evidence surfaces etc. And in jeebuses time they usually passed on stories verbally as not many people could write in those days. And we have all have heard of the concept of chinese whispers.

As for trouser snakes... my year 8 english teacher who was also the local churches priest was charged tried and sent to prison for fucking little boys. (NOT ME, so dont bother with the jokes)

I like the underlying message that religion puts out.. be kind to one another etc i like some of the stories of the old testament, ie the good samaratan. That is one story that stuck in my mind during religion class. But then again... i can be kind to others without religion. Example: One of the guys in my class failed his electronics exam i gave my lunch time to get his study method fixed. I didnt need to give money to church for that.

Unfortunatley its the people that use the church for their own personal gain that makes me fucking hate religion.

Well, although you do make a good point about the victors writing history, that doesn't always apply as it isn't the correct analogy to use. In this case, we have the actual records from the council meetings, in addition to numerous writings of those in attendance including those who had views that did not get adopted in the councils. Besides, these guys were all Romans during a time when the empire was still quite strong. Literacy was a non-issue among the attendees, and amongst the many theologians of the time.

As far as the rest of your post, I can agree with you on points. You don't necessarily need religion to be moral, but that is a matter of philosophy and not specifically religion. There are those within organized religion that hide behind that veil to do unspeakable things, but that is no reason to dismiss the underlying tenants of any religion...that anger should be rightfully directed not on religion itself, but on those that committed those acts and/or allowed them to happen through inaction (usually by means of beurocracy).


Being kind to others is not philosophy, its common fucking sense. ( there is not enough of it) I stick to my point that religion is the root of all evil. More blood has been spilt over religion than anything else.





(debate is good)
 

guyver01

Lifer
Sep 25, 2000
22,135
5
61
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

You know full damn well what he meant... stop being an ass about it..

A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community.

 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

You know full damn well what he meant... stop being an ass about it..

A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community.

Acutually i didnt know what a religious cannon was... thank you for the definition :D
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

You know full damn well what he meant... stop being an ass about it..

A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community.
I agree but you have to admit that it was funny.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

You know full damn well what he meant... stop being an ass about it..

A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community.
I agree but you have to admit that it was funny.

:thumbsup:
 

guyver01

Lifer
Sep 25, 2000
22,135
5
61
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
And what the hell is a christian cannon? IS that what the chior boys get to see.

You know full damn well what he meant... stop being an ass about it..

A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community.
I agree but you have to admit that it was funny.

it WAS funny ;)
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,329
4,994
136
Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon.

No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

There are those within organized religion that hide behind that veil to do unspeakable things, but that is no reason to dismiss the underlying tenants of any religion...that anger should be rightfully directed not on religion itself, but on those that committed those acts and/or allowed them to happen through inaction (usually by means of beurocracy).

For the love of all that's holy, if you're going to talk about religion at least learn the correct terms.

A cannon is a large gun. A canon is a fundanental principle.
A tenant is an occupant, especially a renter. A tenet is, much like a canon, a fundamental belief.
 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: allisolm
Originally posted by: MovingTarget

Many of these never even made it into what we now know as 'the Bible', but were nonetheless candidates for inclusion into Christian cannon.

No, Christian cannon is not a trouser snake nor is it in any way related to the holy hand grenade. :roll:

There are those within organized religion that hide behind that veil to do unspeakable things, but that is no reason to dismiss the underlying tenants of any religion...that anger should be rightfully directed not on religion itself, but on those that committed those acts and/or allowed them to happen through inaction (usually by means of beurocracy).

For the love of all that's holy, if you're going to talk about religion at least learn the correct terms.

A cannon is a large gun. A canon is a fundanental principle.
A tenant is an occupant, especially a renter. A tenet is, much like a canon, a fundamental belief.

Im sorry my spelling isnt to your standard. I am a tradesperson, so i just try to get my basic message across. I am not capable of getting my thoughts across via a proper thesis (i wish i could)
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot

I never read the books but I know what the whole 42 thing is about. Is it possible that the author was trying to get us to read Job 42?

Nope..

Not Even Close.

Douglas Adams was asked many times during his career why he chose the number 42. Many theories were proposed, but he rejected them all. On November 3, 1993, he gave an answer on alt.fan.douglas-adams:

? The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do.' I typed it out. End of story. ?

Adams described his choice as "A completely ordinary number, a number not just divisible by two but also six and seven. In fact it's the sort of number that you could, without any fear, introduce to your parents."

This is great. It goes to show you that many many works of fiction, movies and other works of art are often spontaneously created and the author/artist is really not trying to bury all sorts of meaning and symbolism into the work. Sometimes they do, but in many cases, the deep subtle meanings and inferences are conjured by literary critics.

This is why the world of academia can be pretty clueless sometimes.

 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: iamanidiot
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot
If you have family that can be considered zealots, knowing bible verses can be very useful in arguing your point.

anyone who tries to 'quote bible verses' when arguing with me instantly is invalidated, because they need to rely on a book to tell them what to do.

cant really argue when using someone elses thoughts.

this is the dumbest thing I have ever read. There's something called evidence. It's extra powerful when you use their evidence.

I take it that you have never written a paper with backed up sources then? We are to take your words for the absolute fact?

LOL.. you're gonna use the 'bible' as an "official source in research papers" lol.. good luck with that.

and... who exactly is the "author" of the bible? hmm?
You should really stop and cut your loses. You quote the bible to disprove beliefs because it is the fucking bible, what zealot will say the bible isn't right?

Wow. There is so much fail here that I don't know where to start. You cannot argue against something that you know nothing about, otherwise you come off as a complete fool. I've had many conversations with supposed atheists about my faith, and by far the ones that raise the best points by far are ones that actually know wtf the bible says. Not only that, anyone worth his salt arguing religion would have studied its history, including origins of the gospels, prominent Roman theologians (esp. the schools of Antioch and Alexandria), heresies, councils, etc. etc. etc.

If you don't have at least a cursory knowledge of these, you may as well be trying to disprove all of algebra having only a sixth grade education. I bet guyver01 probably has never heard of basic literary redactionary criticism of the Bible, and why it generally postulates a more basic source for the 'authors' of certain gospels, or the answer to simple questions why certain books are 'missing' from protestant cannon, but included in Roman Catholicism and other Eastern churches. Bah! Ignorance exists on both sides of the theist/atheist aisle.

Nicely said. People are too lazy to develop their gut feelings and instincts into well thought out, researched points of view. Intellecual laziness is just as bad if not worse than blind adherence to dogma and zealotry. In fact, it's pretty much the same exact thing. CLose your eyes and believe it's right....just because.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: nerp
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot

I never read the books but I know what the whole 42 thing is about. Is it possible that the author was trying to get us to read Job 42?

Nope..

Not Even Close.

Douglas Adams was asked many times during his career why he chose the number 42. Many theories were proposed, but he rejected them all. On November 3, 1993, he gave an answer on alt.fan.douglas-adams:

? The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do.' I typed it out. End of story. ?

Adams described his choice as "A completely ordinary number, a number not just divisible by two but also six and seven. In fact it's the sort of number that you could, without any fear, introduce to your parents."

This is great. It goes to show you that many many works of fiction, movies and other works of art are often spontaneously created and the author/artist is really not trying to bury all sorts of meaning and symbolism into the work. Sometimes they do, but in many cases, the deep subtle meanings and inferences are conjured by literary critics.

This is why the world of academia can be pretty clueless sometimes.

You assume that the author is aware of the meaning of what he/she has written.
 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: nerp
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot

I never read the books but I know what the whole 42 thing is about. Is it possible that the author was trying to get us to read Job 42?

Nope..

Not Even Close.

Douglas Adams was asked many times during his career why he chose the number 42. Many theories were proposed, but he rejected them all. On November 3, 1993, he gave an answer on alt.fan.douglas-adams:

? The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do.' I typed it out. End of story. ?

Adams described his choice as "A completely ordinary number, a number not just divisible by two but also six and seven. In fact it's the sort of number that you could, without any fear, introduce to your parents."

This is great. It goes to show you that many many works of fiction, movies and other works of art are often spontaneously created and the author/artist is really not trying to bury all sorts of meaning and symbolism into the work. Sometimes they do, but in many cases, the deep subtle meanings and inferences are conjured by literary critics.

This is why the world of academia can be pretty clueless sometimes.

You assume that the author is aware of the meaning of what he/she has written.

How can an author not be aware of waht they have written?
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: nerp
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot

I never read the books but I know what the whole 42 thing is about. Is it possible that the author was trying to get us to read Job 42?

Nope..

Not Even Close.

Douglas Adams was asked many times during his career why he chose the number 42. Many theories were proposed, but he rejected them all. On November 3, 1993, he gave an answer on alt.fan.douglas-adams:

? The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do.' I typed it out. End of story. ?

Adams described his choice as "A completely ordinary number, a number not just divisible by two but also six and seven. In fact it's the sort of number that you could, without any fear, introduce to your parents."

This is great. It goes to show you that many many works of fiction, movies and other works of art are often spontaneously created and the author/artist is really not trying to bury all sorts of meaning and symbolism into the work. Sometimes they do, but in many cases, the deep subtle meanings and inferences are conjured by literary critics.

This is why the world of academia can be pretty clueless sometimes.

You assume that the author is aware of the meaning of what he/she has written.

Red, that's my point! Sure, there are works like 1984 and Animal Farm by Orwell which are very much rooted in purposeful symbolism, but many great works were written by people who said they had no idea that their work would end up being as important as it is in the long run. But in so many cases, in interviews, authors and artists say they just wrote what came to them and the underlying message seemed to come out on its own, or, was pointed out by literary critics.

There are so many examples of masterpieces written by people who said they really were just trying to write an interesting story and things just fell into place organically. Not everyone is as OCD as Ayn Rand who outlined every single sentence and word to prop up her self-absorbed fantasy world in which everyone is born with a trust fund and has the luxury of deciding everything for themselves.

:)
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: nerp
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: iamanidiot

I never read the books but I know what the whole 42 thing is about. Is it possible that the author was trying to get us to read Job 42?

Nope..

Not Even Close.

Douglas Adams was asked many times during his career why he chose the number 42. Many theories were proposed, but he rejected them all. On November 3, 1993, he gave an answer on alt.fan.douglas-adams:

? The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do.' I typed it out. End of story. ?

Adams described his choice as "A completely ordinary number, a number not just divisible by two but also six and seven. In fact it's the sort of number that you could, without any fear, introduce to your parents."

This is great. It goes to show you that many many works of fiction, movies and other works of art are often spontaneously created and the author/artist is really not trying to bury all sorts of meaning and symbolism into the work. Sometimes they do, but in many cases, the deep subtle meanings and inferences are conjured by literary critics.

This is why the world of academia can be pretty clueless sometimes.

You assume that the author is aware of the meaning of what he/she has written.

How can an author not be aware of waht they have written?

Reader-response criticism.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
...
How can an author not be aware of waht they have written?
"Margaret wore a green shirt. Green like an old coca-cola bottle."

Some might read into this that the author had sexual thoughts about margaret since many associate the curves of the old coca-cola bottles with the female form.

---

Hopefully you are aware that there are several browsers that have built-in spell checkers. There is even an add-on for ie called ie7pro. For example, I typed builtin instead of built-in and google chrome flagged it for me. It's freakin' magic. The computer is great at covering up illiteracy.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
...
How can an author not be aware of waht they have written?
"Margaret wore a green shirt. Green like an old coca-cola bottle."

Some might read into this that the author had sexual thoughts about margaret since many associate the curves of the old coca-cola bottles with the female form.

---

Hopefully you are aware that there are several browsers that have built-in spell checkers. There is even an add-on for ie called ie7pro. For example, I typed builtin instead of built-in and google chrome flagged it for me. It's freakin' magic. The computer is great at covering up illiteracy.

Some might focus on the fact that the shirt was green as they had a traumatic experience that involved something green during their childhood and it will be difficult to dislodge this association, irrespective of the intended meaning stated by the author.

Sorry for the derail, but people asked. You can now get back to the business of debunking or defending religion.

 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Sea Moose
...
How can an author not be aware of waht they have written?
"Margaret wore a green shirt. Green like an old coca-cola bottle."

Some might read into this that the author had sexual thoughts about margaret since many associate the curves of the old coca-cola bottles with the female form.

---

Hopefully you are aware that there are several browsers that have built-in spell checkers. There is even an add-on for ie called ie7pro. For example, I typed builtin instead of built-in and google chrome flagged it for me. It's freakin' magic. The computer is great at covering up illiteracy.

I know what you mean i suppose. But everyone knows that the number 42 is the meaning of life and everything :p
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Irish
...
Some might focus on the fact that the shirt was green as they had a traumatic experience that involved something green during their childhood, irrespective of the intended meaning stated by the author.
Some may have been beaten in their early childhood with a green vegetable - broccoli, for example.

Sorry for the derail, but people asked. You can now get back to the business of debunking or defending religion.
It's ironic that this thread was created as a farce and intended to be contentious. It's turned out to be a relatively gentle thread about religion. Weird. We need to get with it.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Red Irish
...
Some might focus on the fact that the shirt was green as they had a traumatic experience that involved something green during their childhood, irrespective of the intended meaning stated by the author.
Some may have been beaten in their early childhood with a green vegetable - broccoli, for example.

Sorry for the derail, but people asked. You can now get back to the business of debunking or defending religion.
It's ironic that this thread was created as a farce and intended to be contentious. It's turned out to be a relatively gentle thread about religion. Weird. We need to get with it.

Brussel sprouts: now that's vicious.

Yes, it is relatively gentle given the subject-matter - a pleasant change.