Reducing the poor- FORCE birth control on welfare recipiants

[JEDI]

From this THREAD

If you're on welfare, odds are that your children will also be on welfare when they grow up. It's a never ending cycle.

So why not inject birth control to all the women of child bearing age? If you don't get an injection, then no $ for you.

And no, i'm not sexist. If there was a male birth control, then force it on them too. but there isn't one that u can inject and last for months.

hm..tie the tubes and vasectomies is an idea. but they're only reversible for a time.

Right to bear children? HA! If you can't afford to take care of yourself w/o handouts, then you should be banned from having children!

Your thoughts?

 

[Hammer]

the constitution says you're jezo

 

[CChaos]

If you're a human being, odds are that you'll die one day. Why don't we just kill you now?

 

[waylman]

Your thoughts?

you're an idiot. do you realize how many basic human rights are being violated by your suggestions?

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: JEDI
From this THREAD

If you're on welfare, odds are that your children will also be on welfare when they grow up. It's a never ending cycle.

So why not inject birth control to all the women of child bearing age? If you don't get an injection, then no $ for you.

And no, i'm not sexist. If there was a male birth control, then force it on them too. but there isn't one that u can inject and last for months.

hm..tie the tubes and vasectomies is an idea. but they're only reversible for a time.

Right to bear children? HA! If you can't afford to take care of yourself w/o handouts, then you should be banned from having children!

Your thoughts?

My thoughts? You are a Spooge!
This is America Bucko where a poor person has the opportunity to raise his social status through hard work. I bet you didn't even take that into consideration before you posted your unbelievable ignorance for everyone on this forum to witness.

 

[toekramp]

eugenics!

 

[dighn]

fascist

 

[Ynog]

Why stop there,

There are tons of people that shouldn't be having children. So we should set an age limit to when you can start having children and
everyone has to be forced to take birtch control. And then the government can decide which of us are lucky enough to be able to
have children.

That way we can stem the population increase, decrease poverty, and there will be more food, so no one has to starve.

 

[Amused]

This is why welfare should be ended. Socialism is anathema to individual liberty. You can never be free when the people making the laws are also your keeper.

 

[Quixfire]

This coming from a guy who think Bush is a fascist?

You clearly don't understand what makes America great.

 

[StageLeft]

I don't think we should do that, but we should be able to take their kids and for a couple of thousand bucks have the kid as a slave.

 

[UnatcoAgent]

That's the stupidest idea I've heard already today.

 

[KidViciou$]

need i add anything that hasn't already been said?

 

[J0hnny]

Originally posted by: Quixfire
This coming from a guy who think Bush is a fascist?

You clearly don't understand what makes America great.

That's exactly how I read it as well!

 

[IGBT]

Seems like this would be a great oppertunity for drug testing as well. May as well get to the root of the addiction problem rather then finance it thru welfare...

 

[Fausto]

Hmm....in keeping with the spirit of the OP; how about manditory euthanasia for those adults who have proven themselves idiots with no hope of rehabilitation?

 

[freegeeks]

....they should have started with your mother

 

[Quixfire]

Originally posted by: freegeeks
....they should have started with your mother

:Q

 

[TommyVercetti]

If you ever run for office, this post is going to come back to haunt you.

 

[KidViciou$]

hahahaha tommy, thats the way i Post. i try to never say anything that will come back to haunt me

 

[Regs]

This seems like something only George Carlin would say, as a joke. Which more than likely is. It's just one of those statements that make you go "hmmmm".

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
I don't think we should do that, but we should be able to take their kids and for a couple of thousand bucks have the kid as a slave.

This is a terrible idea!


Unless you meant, like, older stronger kids who can tote bales.

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: feralkid

Originally posted by: Skoorb
I don't think we should do that, but we should be able to take their kids and for a couple of thousand bucks have the kid as a slave.

This is a terrible idea!


Unless you meant, like, older stronger kids who can tote bails.

Well as kids we'd probably need to send them off to a camp that just processes them as youngsters, puts them in on nutrient slurry, and gives them a lot of excercise so that by the time they are 5-6 they can really start to do serious manual labor.

 

[DivideBYZero]

Stupid post.

Motion for Ban.

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: feralkid

Originally posted by: Skoorb
I don't think we should do that, but we should be able to take their kids and for a couple of thousand bucks have the kid as a slave.

This is a terrible idea!


Unless you meant, like, older stronger kids who can tote bails.

Well as kids we'd probably need to send them off to a camp that just processes them as youngsters, puts them in on nutrient slurry, and gives them a lot of excercise so that by the time they are 5-6 they can really start to do serious manual labor.

Yeah, but I heard that the slurry can make them taste kind of gamey.