glenn beck
Platinum Member
Originally posted by: eits
frederick, md? you mean fredneck? what a shithole that place is... it's mainly white trash that lives up there.
the hell are you talking about?
Originally posted by: eits
frederick, md? you mean fredneck? what a shithole that place is... it's mainly white trash that lives up there.
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: VTrider
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Dumbasses on both sides. While I think the guy should be prosecuted for causing the accident intentionally, I don't see how he is responsible for their deaths.
So let's say your feeling mischievous and drop banana peels on the floor of a subway station with the intent to cause an accident (to have somebody loose control and slip/fall). You only place them 2 feet from the edge of the tracks - where your not supposed to stand because of the obvious danger from speeding trains, yet, somebody stands there...slips on the banana peels, falls on the tracks and gets run over by the train - dead.
Now according to your logic, would you say that although you are guilty for causing this accident you shouldn't be held accountable for that person's death because he/she was a dumbass for standing there in the first place? :roll: I hope for the sake of society, your not eligible for jury duty yet. (That goes for you too BlancoNino and VTHodge😉 )
I don't think that is an appropriate analogy. Something closer would be a bunch of people playing a game (say football). Player 1 pulls an illegal move, say trips another. Unknown to him player 2 has a medical condition (which player 2 knows about) which causes the fall to kill player 2.
What I am saying is that 1) Both parties were engaged in risky behavior and 2) The two women are liable for their own deaths (though certainly not the accident) due to the suicidal behavior of not wearing seatbelts.
Ah ha! I'm telling Lola 😀Originally posted by: iamwiz82
women!
:: Runs away ::
😛
Originally posted by: magnux
I stopped issuing obscene gestures once I got my Road Rage Cards. Much more effective, I've found.
Originally posted by: magnux
I stopped issuing obscene gestures once I got my Road Rage Cards. Much more effective, I've found.
Originally posted by: halik
Inaccurate headline... more like reason why darwin likes people that drive convertibles without seatbelts.
Originally posted by: VTrider
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: VTrider
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Dumbasses on both sides. While I think the guy should be prosecuted for causing the accident intentionally, I don't see how he is responsible for their deaths.
So let's say your feeling mischievous and drop banana peels on the floor of a subway station with the intent to cause an accident (to have somebody loose control and slip/fall). You only place them 2 feet from the edge of the tracks - where your not supposed to stand because of the obvious danger from speeding trains, yet, somebody stands there...slips on the banana peels, falls on the tracks and gets run over by the train - dead.
Now according to your logic, would you say that although you are guilty for causing this accident you shouldn't be held accountable for that person's death because he/she was a dumbass for standing there in the first place? :roll: I hope for the sake of society, your not eligible for jury duty yet. (That goes for you too BlancoNino and VTHodge😉 )
I don't think that is an appropriate analogy. Something closer would be a bunch of people playing a game (say football). Player 1 pulls an illegal move, say trips another. Unknown to him player 2 has a medical condition (which player 2 knows about) which causes the fall to kill player 2.
What I am saying is that 1) Both parties were engaged in risky behavior and 2) The two women are liable for their own deaths (though certainly not the accident) due to the suicidal behavior of not wearing seatbelts.
In light of your football analogy, do you feel then that if the pickup driver knew beforehand that the occupants of the convertable were 'not' wearing their seatbelts, and did what he did anyway - would he then be guility in their deaths?
So if this ever went to court, what do you feel should be the 'appropriate' charges against the pickup driver? Don't you think that if he wasn't atleast 'partially' responsible for their deaths that this would equate to state condoned road rage behavior with no serious consequences?
Originally posted by: mattocs
People in the car should have watched out. The driver of the truck did nothing wrong. Maybe a bird flew in front of him or something.
Yeah... if that was a serious post, well, let's just say mattocs ain't gettin into Mensa.Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: mattocs
People in the car should have watched out. The driver of the truck did nothing wrong. Maybe a bird flew in front of him or something.
Wow. Um... I hope you die in a car accident.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
lesson is you don't respond at the time, but from a distance follow the jackass to his next destination, then you key the f*ck out of his truck when he leaves it. be like a vengeful ninja. not sayin i do such...😛 just watch out if ur a prick on the road.