Real world difference between .40, .45, and 9MM

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Take it for what you will. The tl;dr version seems to be 'stupid people with guns are more dangerous than stupid people without guns'.
Damn good summary...seems like common sense to me, what isn't common sense is that the dumb should dictate what the masses that aren't get to have and do
 

Pia

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,563
0
0
Every hi-point I've handled was thick and heavy. These arent desirable attributes; you don't buy a gun for its utility as a melee weapon.
Weight is absolutely a desirable attribute for a home defense and range gun. It reduces felt recoil, lets you get better shots by making the gun more stable, and makes the gun point easier. Only someone with very weak hands, likely due to age/health issues, might need to think about whether a handgun is too heavy.
 

Dannar26

Senior member
Mar 13, 2012
754
142
106
Weight is absolutely a desirable attribute for a home defense and range gun. It reduces felt recoil, lets you get better shots by making the gun more stable, and makes the gun point easier. Only someone with very weak hands, likely due to age/health issues, might need to think about whether a handgun is too heavy.

Making the weapon big and clunky is the cheap way to address the points you bring up. At that point I'd say the issue lies more in the type of frame you're employing; IE is the weapon a full sized service pistol, or is it a small little carry gun? You're right, for home defense (and range), having the bigger gun isn't a problem. But there's no need for weight for the sake of weight.

I wouldn't take a hi-point over a glock because the glock wilk accomplish everything thing the hi-point does, and at a lower weight premium. That's win-win to me.

Duely blundered from my thunderdolt
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Making the weapon big and clunky is the cheap way to address the points you bring up. At that point I'd say the issue lies more in the type of frame you're employing; IE is the weapon a full sized service pistol, or is it a small little carry gun? You're right, for home defense (and range), having the bigger gun isn't a problem. But there's no need for weight for the sake of weight.

I wouldn't take a hi-point over a glock because the glock wilk accomplish everything thing the hi-point does, and at a lower weight premium. That's win-win to me.
Hi-Point could be the most reliable gun ever made and I still wouldn't own one...they're fugly:p of course I feel the same way about Glock too so...yeah
 

SilthDraeth

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2003
2,635
0
71
First .45 I bought was a hipoint. If you are still in the market, I would check out Kahr cw 45

They can be picked up for less than $400 sometimes and is a very nice gun, very slim, comes in 9mm, .40, and .45

But between hipoint and Smith and Wesson, go with the SW.
 

Pia

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,563
0
0
Put a laser pointer on the pistol?
Does not improve real performance and may decrease it - as usual when adding crap on guns.

A slide-mounted low profile red dot is actually useful, but hardly essential and quite pricy.
 
Last edited:

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
Does not improve real performance and may decrease it - as usual when adding crap on guns.

A slide-mounted low profile red dot is actually useful, but hardly essential and quite pricy.

Normally I'd agree but one of the top pistol instructors has this to say:

ToddG said:
If you weren't ever going to practice, I'd say the laser could be a good idea. It allows you to aim while keeping a target focus and doesn't rely on precise alignment between eye, gun, and target. Take two equally bad shooters and I see the untrained guy with a laser outshoot the untrained guy with iron sights every time.
 

Merad

Platinum Member
May 31, 2010
2,586
19
81
Making the weapon big and clunky is the cheap way to address the points you bring up. At that point I'd say the issue lies more in the type of frame you're employing; IE is the weapon a full sized service pistol, or is it a small little carry gun? You're right, for home defense (and range), having the bigger gun isn't a problem. But there's no need for weight for the sake of weight.



Hipoint pistols are big and clunky because they use a blowback action. They need the mass in the slide to keep the breech closed until pressure drops. To lower the mass of the slide they'd have to change to another more complicated type of action and wouldn't be able to make their guns anywhere near as cheaply as they do.
 

Pia

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,563
0
0
Making the weapon big and clunky is the cheap way to address the points you bring up. At that point I'd say the issue lies more in the type of frame you're employing; IE is the weapon a full sized service pistol, or is it a small little carry gun? You're right, for home defense (and range), having the bigger gun isn't a problem. But there's no need for weight for the sake of weight.
Weight isn't the first or second or third thing to look for in a gun, but more weight on the frame of the gun really does help by itself. It's a matter of elementary physics. It is also obvious in practice - just try shooting a revolver both in airweight and steel versions. Or look at IDPA rules, which define strict upper limits for gun weight to keep things fair.
 

Pia

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,563
0
0
Normally I'd agree but one of the top pistol instructors has this to say:
I'm sure he is right when he says a laser is good for a handgun shooter who won't practice at all. I just think - and said as much earlier in the thread - that a person not willing to train should prefer a shotgun. If you don't have the use of both of your hands, and aren't willing to practice, then sure, handgun with laser it is.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Kel-tech is above hi-point in terms of quality. Lots of people are eager to heap on the hate; nothing I've encountered personally gives me a clue as to why.

Probably the best selling gun right now, Ruger LCP, is a Kel-Tec design.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Kel-tec design, but using the superior Ruger build quality.
And I was totally unaware of it being the best selling gun right now.
 

Kroze

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2001
4,052
1
0
I have. The guy that works for me took 6 9mm to the mid section. Had surgery, was in the hospital for a month, but he is alive and kicking today.
Not because it's 9mm round though, he's just extremely lucky.
 

DaFinn

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
4,725
0
0
In 2010 they manufactured 255,789 of them. How many Glock 17's are sold in a year?

Glock 17 and its variants are standard military service weapons in over 50 countries and standard law enforcement weapons in 48 countries (2011). >65% of US law enforcement agencies are using Glock (2011). 2.500.000 units had been manufactured by 2011. Glock does not disclose figures for govermental sales, but it makes the major part of their business.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Ummm, how many of those manufactured were sold?

I assume they are all selling. That's 50,000 more than the year before. The number of .380s manufactured in this country from 2007 to 2010 has quadrupled. Since Obama became president Ruger's stock price is up 510%. So I would guess they are selling well.
 

LiuKangBakinPie

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
3,903
0
0
Glock 17 and its variants are standard military service weapons in over 50 countries and standard law enforcement weapons in 48 countries (2011). >65% of US law enforcement agencies are using Glock (2011). 2.500.000 units had been manufactured by 2011. Glock does not disclose figures for govermental sales, but it makes the major part of their business.

The Glock 17 and its descentants became very popular military and law enforcement firearms, being exported in more than 50 countries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.