Real or Rendered?

[Saint Nick]

rendered. too easy. lol

 

[illusion88]

Originally posted by: notfred
It's a pretty accurate rendition of Mono Lake if it's rendered.

Those formations are different. So it's highly possible it's rendered, or another formation in the lake.

 

[ribbon13]

Render or sh!tty camera

And most of the time the water at Mono lake looks like this

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: jtvang125
If it really is an actual picture, it was taken in a low light situation where a longer exposure would be needed. This may have caused the small ripples to smooth out such as using a long exposure for a waterfall. The water becomes blurred.

winnAr!

 

[Crescent13]

Rendered. The reflection in the water is just blurred, not really refracted and reflected.

 

[HN]

Originally posted by: Ryan

Originally posted by: jtvang125
If it really is an actual picture, it was taken in a low light situation where a longer exposure would be needed. This may have caused the small ripples to smooth out such as using a long exposure for a waterfall. The water becomes blurred.

winnAr!

no. because as mentioned earlier, if the exposure was held for that long, then the clouds, too should have the blurred effect. however, in the picture, they do not; they have defined lines.

 

[iamtrout]

Real. It's one of Fred Miranda's pictures I think.

 

[sonoma1993]

i say render

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: HN

Originally posted by: Ryan

Originally posted by: jtvang125
If it really is an actual picture, it was taken in a low light situation where a longer exposure would be needed. This may have caused the small ripples to smooth out such as using a long exposure for a waterfall. The water becomes blurred.

winnAr!

no. because as mentioned earlier, if the exposure was held for that long, then the clouds, too should have the blurred effect. however, in the picture, they do not; they have defined lines.

I wasn't under the impression that clouds moved that fast to make the image blurry.

 

[iamtrout]

Originally posted by: iamtrout
Real. It's one of Fred Miranda's pictures I think.

EDIT: All you "rendered" people have been pwned. By me.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/hosting/show...o.php?photo=9685&sort=1&cat=500&page=1

 

[ribbon13]

another photo

 

[MrDingleDangle]

Originally posted by: iamtrout

Originally posted by: iamtrout
Real. It's one of Fred Miranda's pictures I think.

EDIT: All you "rendered" people have been pwned. By me.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/hosting/show...o.php?photo=9685&sort=1&cat=500&page=1

<----OWNED!

 

[HN]

Originally posted by: iamtrout

Originally posted by: iamtrout
Real. It's one of Fred Miranda's pictures I think.

EDIT: All you "rendered" people have been pwned. By me.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/hosting/show...o.php?photo=9685&sort=1&cat=500&page=1

Now i stand pwned. I salute you.

 

[jtvang125]

Just as I have suspected. In the bigger picture, you can clearly see that along the edges of the rock shadows on the surface of the water is slightly blurred. This blurred created the no ripple effect by using a long exposure time.

 

[yhelothar]

haha everyone just got 0wn3d hardcore.. well except me, and the small handful of people that said real.

 

[jiwq]

i'd say it's real

 

[jiwq]

Originally posted by: ribbon13
Render or sh!tty camera

Only if you consider Canon EOS 1-D to be sh!tty

 

[RaDragon]

Real