Rate my boobies taken down! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Antisocial Virge

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 1999
6,578
0
0
This is just a stupid "feel good" law that is going to do nothing to stop the real problem of underage porn. The problem of a 16 yr old flashing her boobs is fairly minor compared to porn involving sex acts with kids whose age is still in the single digits. The true underage porn is underground and already illegal so its buisness as usual under this new law.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: chambersc
so that means they were showing some underage kiddies....prolly 17.89 years old. damn.

Actually, no.

If you were to actually read the OP's post, you would see:

CENSORED BY US GOVERNMENT
18 USC 2257

Well, guess, what? 18 USC 2257 is actually a LAW that is now being enforced by the US Government. Look it up.

Lookit up for me?

Cliff notes: All models on sites involving nudity must have documention to prove age. That's not entirely Bush's fault. PS: I am a Bush hater.
 

Jawo

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2005
4,125
0
0
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: blazert40
I have to get new tires, fvcking Bush!!

Who the fvck cares?

There are so many damn sites like this out there it is of no concern, even sites like tangotime let you rate by different parts.
I don't think you understand.

Sites like tangotime will cease to exist because of this law.

How are they different? They can't prove the people in the pictures are over 18.

This is but the first casualty.

I don't see why these fvcktards are getting up in arms over this. This isn't Bush's fault, so blaming it on him is ignorant.

Right on! there are as many die hard liberals as there are ultra conservatives....and they will never, ever agree on stuff.....this law has been around for almost 20 years....whats the big deal about enforcement now?

The biggest problem today in the most recent Supreme Court Decision.....Where Clinton is to blame for appointing Stephen G. Breyer! (nominated under Clinton in 1994)

 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
It's a good thing rate my poo is still up, had me worried for a minute....

Ohh, that is friggin gross, don't anyone go there it is really still there....
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: blazert40
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: blazert40
I have to get new tires, fvcking Bush!!

Who the fvck cares?

There are so many damn sites like this out there it is of no concern, even sites like tangotime let you rate by different parts.
I don't think you understand.

Sites like tangotime will cease to exist because of this law.

How are they different? They can't prove the people in the pictures are over 18.

This is but the first casualty.

If they don't cover themselves or provide proof that the people shown there are 18+ then I don't see what there is to get upset over?

It's not like its a new thing that people have to be 18+ to pose nude.
Umm, hello?

This law REQUIRES DOCUMENTED PROOF that they ARE 18.

It's not enough to just click the "I am 18" button anymore.

Any and all sites that allow users to post nude photos of themselves are under fire.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,879
3,306
136
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Nitemare
It's a good thing rate my poo is still up, had me worried for a minute....

Ohh, that is friggin gross, don't anyone go there it is really still there....

talk to yourself much?

and yes, that site will make you gag
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Eli

Umm, hello?

This law REQUIRES DOCUMENTED PROOF that they ARE 18.

It's not enough to just click the "I am 18" button anymore.

Any and all sites that allow users to post nude photos of themselves are under fire.

If you're running a business that is profitting off of something that legally requires verification, then you sure as hell better provide it.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Nitemare
It's a good thing rate my poo is still up, had me worried for a minute....

Ohh, that is friggin gross, don't anyone go there it is really still there....

talk to yourself much?

and yes, that site will make you gag

I'm off my meds :(
 

BAMAVOO

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,087
41
91
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Before you roll your eyes, take a look at this statement that appears on the site:

"The regulations were promulgated by Alberto Gonzales, US Attorney General appointed by George Bush. If you voted for Bush, this is your fault. If you think this country is free, you are sadly mistaken. No nation has freedom when it is run by religious zealots."

This is absolutely correct. Bush is indirectly responsible for this (by appointing Alberto Gonzales as AG). It is also correct that no nation has freedom if it is run by religious zealots.

Yes! If only we'd voted Kerry for President, so that the internet would flow free with child pornagraphy! :roll:

;)

The internet already flows free with child pornography. But not on ratemyboobies.com.. This particular law is only meant to make things more difficult on the adult web entertainment industry, not because there are actual victims that need to be protected from anything. It's legislating morality, as religious zealots are wont to do .

Nice Engrish :confused:
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Before you roll your eyes, take a look at this statement that appears on the site:

"The regulations were promulgated by Alberto Gonzales, US Attorney General appointed by George Bush. If you voted for Bush, this is your fault. If you think this country is free, you are sadly mistaken. No nation has freedom when it is run by religious zealots."

This is absolutely correct. Bush is indirectly responsible for this (by appointing Alberto Gonzales as AG). It is also correct that no nation has freedom if it is run by religious zealots.

Yes! If only we'd voted Kerry for President, so that the internet would flow free with child pornagraphy! :roll:

;)

The internet already flows free with child pornography. But not on ratemyboobies.com.. This particular law is only meant to make things more difficult on the adult web entertainment industry, not because there are actual victims that need to be protected from anything. It's legislating morality, as religious zealots are wont to do .

Nice Engrish :confused:

There's nothing Engrish about it. I suggest you expand your vocabulary.
 

rmrf

Platinum Member
May 14, 2003
2,872
0
0
how long until collegehumor has to take some of their stuff down? or wouldn't the (.)(.)'s on there count?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,600
1,005
126
Originally posted by: Phokus
One of my favorite websites too :(

Their obituary from their front page:

CENSORED BY US GOVERNMENT
18 USC 2257

The government is mandating that we meet certain bookkeeping requirements, ones impossible to meet for this site. Never mind that those requirements do not actually gain the public anything. This is the strongest attack on free speech since the passage of the CDA, and oddly, the media seems to have hardly noticed. The penalty for not abiding by these bookkeeping requirements is five years prison.

The regulations were promulgated by Alberto Gonzales, US Attorney General appointed by George Bush. If you voted for Bush, this is your fault. If you think this country is free, you are sadly mistaken. No nation has freedom when it is run by religious zealots.

Fvck religious zealots!!! May they all burn in hell. :|
 

Mojoed

Diamond Member
Jul 20, 2004
4,473
1
81
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: rbloedow
same thing for Rate my Schlong :(
all is not lost then :D
It is down :( :( :(

wth - things are never going to be the same :(

I think you originally misunderstood him. The site went down the same time ratemyboobs went down.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Mojoed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: rbloedow
same thing for Rate my Schlong :(
all is not lost then :D
It is down :( :( :(

wth - things are never going to be the same :(

I think you originally misunderstood him. The site went down the same time ratemyboobs went down.
yeh, i did, so i just checked the site... boo hoo :(