Rasmussen poll 5/2: Trump 41%, Clinton 39%

[ivwshane]

To be intellectually honest, do that with Hillary now.

Do you deny those quotes are accurate? Do you deny that any of those quotes were not taken out of context?

 

[buckshot24]

Do you deny those quotes are accurate? Do you deny that any of those quotes were not taken out of context?

No, I don't.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

the thing is, drumpf gives enough ammunition to sink a freighter, yet his followers have no issue with him flip-flopping or just flat out lying. no need to make anything up, just quote the drumpf
“An ‘extremely credible source’ has called my office and told me that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud
“You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as you’ve got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.”
“I will build a great wall – and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me – and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.”
“All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”
“It’s freezing and snowing in New York – we need global warming!”
“I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”
“My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body.”
"Look at those hands, are they small hands? And, [Republican rival Marco Rubio] referred to my hands: 'If they're small, something else must be small.' I guarantee you there's no problem. I guarantee."

and that is just scratching the surface

Case in point.

 

[buckshot24]

Case in point.

Some of those quotes are so completely benign, at least for sane people.

We need global warming?! What a horrible thing to say!

Take your meds.

 

[ivwshane]

No, I don't.

Now feel free to do the same with Hillary quotes.

 

[Exophase]

To be intellectually honest, do that with Hillary now.

You do it.

 

[fskimospy]

You think that is out there yet think that a grown, and respected, man is going to throw a woman to the ground for no reason in public?

You think that this woman would never give false witness or some of with a scheme to fuck over lewandowski? You think that this is the worst thing, or most unbelievable thing a woman has made up to froth up the white knights and sjws?

Tawana brawley? Duke rape?

This chick has done this to how many people now? It seems like every man she meets she accuses of sexual harassment and every situation she has been has been a beating. And you really find the possibility that she falsified evidence, created the recording after the fact, or even close to it and embellished purposefully that far fetched?

Are you goddamned kidding me?

She triggered every fucking white knight and liberal feminist on the planet and knew what she was doing. All because she, Ben schapiro, and her boyfriend, love cruz and she has a book coming out.

It is *FAR* more believable that she did that 100% unintentionally, when the video completely refuted her, than to believe she would never do that. Because her character is so beyond reproach that she, and her audio, should be believed well over the visual evidence, the secret service, and Lewandowski.

How can you be so fucking naive?

Quoted for batshit crazy.

 

[LegendKiller]

Quoted for batshit crazy.

Quoted for the intellectually dishonesty, partisan hackery, and blithe naiveté.

 

[buckshot24]

You do it.

Not interested.

 

[jackstar7]

Is intellectual dishonesty the new buzz-phrase?

People should have to familiarize themselves with the meaning and the practice before lobbing it around so poorly.

 

[buckshot24]

Is intellectual dishonesty the new buzz-phrase?

People should have to familiarize themselves with the meaning and the practice before lobbing it around so poorly.

That is just intellectually dishonest of you.:sneaky:

 

[LegendKiller]

Is intellectual dishonesty the new buzz-phrase?

People should have to familiarize themselves with the meaning and the practice before lobbing it around so poorly.

How is he not being intellectually dishonest?

 

[buckshot24]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Gravis_National_Trump_Clinton_May_2016.pdf

Another neck and neck poll.

 

[blankslate]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/doc...n_May_2016.pdf

Another neck and neck poll.

Yep

The entrenched democratic establishment want Clinton because she has always gone along to go along.

The media wants a neck and neck race. With Senator Clinton as the nominee we will have a horse race that is easier to sell to advertisers.

If Bernie Sanders is the nominee it's much less likely (one way or another) to be that.


_________

 

[buckshot24]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Gravis_National_Trump_Clinton_May_2016.pdf

Another neck and neck poll.

This poll has Trump +10 with Latinos.

Clinton has 87% black vote.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Y7cA8w6Hk

 

[compuwiz1]

This poll has Trump +10 with Latinos.

Clinton has 87% black vote.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Y7cA8w6Hk

These are legal Latinos. Most of my friends who are Latinos and here legally have no problem with Trump's stance on illegal immigration. They don't want them here either and many of them are voting for Trump. Yeah, I know this goes against what the left wants us to believe.

 

[buckshot24]

These are legal Latinos. Most of my friends who are Latinos and here legally have no problem with Trump's stance on illegal immigration. They don't want them here either and many of them are voting for Trump. Yeah, I know this goes against what the left wants us to believe.

If this holds during the election its going to make it pretty difficult for Hillary to win.

 

[fskimospy]

If this holds during the election its going to make it pretty difficult for Hillary to win.

Interesting to see you doing your unskewed polls bullshit so early. Did you learn nothing from the last election?

 

[buckshot24]

Interesting to see you doing your unskewed polls bullshit so early. Did you learn nothing from the last election?

Yes, I'll trust the polls much more this time around. But I said nothing about this poll being skewed. I was talking about the Latino vote. If Trump gets 55% of that vote, its going to be hard for Hillary to win.

 

[LegendKiller]

Interesting to see you doing your unskewed polls bullshit so early. Did you learn nothing from the last election?

Has the last year taught you nothing. Hillary can't even beat an old commie who thinks bread lines are great. The gop machine hasn't even started on her yet.

 

[fskimospy]

Has the last year taught you nothing. Hillary can't even beat an old commie who thinks bread lines are great. The gop machine hasn't even started on her yet.

Here's the thing: I'm not emotionally invested like you are. If it turned out that Trump were winning I would accept that easily. You're just too irrational to do that, which is why you end up looking stupid so often. Your sin is pride.

 

[LegendKiller]

Here's the thing: I'm not emotionally invested like you are. If it turned out that Trump were winning I would accept that easily. You're just too irrational to do that, which is why you end up looking stupid so often. Your sin is pride.

Yeah, that's why you've run around attacking trump like a mad dog and defending hillbilly like you're her white knight. Bitch, please.

 

[soundforbjt]

Yes, I'll trust the polls much more this time around. But I said nothing about this poll being skewed. I was talking about the Latino vote. If Trump gets 55% of that vote, its going to be hard for Hillary to win.

Unfortunately for you his unfavorables with Latino voters is around 80+%.

 

[DrPizza]

Yes, I'll trust the polls much more this time around. But I said nothing about this poll being skewed. I was talking about the Latino vote. If Trump gets 55% of that vote, its going to be hard for Hillary to win.

Then, perhaps you should look at a poll. His anecdotal speculation is going to leave him very surprised when the election is over. Hilary is destroying Trump with the Latino vote.

Has the last year taught you nothing. Hillary can't even beat an old commie who thinks bread lines are great. The gop machine hasn't even started on her yet.

What the hell? The GOP machine hasn't stopped attacking her in over 2 decades.

 

[Jhhnn]

Has the last year taught you nothing. Hillary can't even beat an old commie who thinks bread lines are great. The gop machine hasn't even started on her yet.

Republicans started in on Hillary in 1992 & she's still standing. Has that taught you nothing?

I'm sure Repubs will be flinging their own poo before it's over. It's pretty much all they've got.