• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Raptor Lake - Official Thread

Page 72 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hulk

Diamond Member
Since we already have the first Raptor Lake leak I'm thinking it should have it's own thread.
What do we know so far?
From Anandtech's Intel Process Roadmap articles from July:

Built on Intel 7 with upgraded FinFET
10-15% PPW (performance-per-watt)
Last non-tiled consumer CPU as Meteor Lake will be tiled

I'm guessing this will be a minor update to ADL with just a few microarchitecture changes to the cores. The larger change will be the new process refinement allowing 8+16 at the top of the stack.

Will it work with current z690 motherboards? If yes then that could be a major selling point for people to move to ADL rather than wait.
 
12600K scores 1858.
13600K only 1914? It is very small difference. It is even lower than change from 4900 to 5100 MHz boost would suggest with the same IPC (1933).

Can 13600K be just renamed Alder lake chip?
 
12600K scores 1858.
13600K only 1914? It is very small difference. It is even lower than change from 4900 to 5100 MHz boost would suggest with the same IPC (1933).

Can 13600K be just renamed Alder lake chip?
Gb is memory bound. I score 2050 on my 12900k due to memory. Dont pay much attention
 
Last edited:
Word on the street is Intel plans to use old ADL stock for the low-end RPL SKUs (non-K i5s and lower).

If the leaks are true, it seems the only difference between the i3-12100 and i3-13100 (for example) is +100Mhz base clock on the latter (and maybe higher boost). In other words, no added value from RPL IPC improvements.

Seems pretty disingenuous.
 
Last edited:
Word on the street is Intel plans to use old ADL stock for the low-end RPL SKUs (non-K i5s and lower).

If the leaks are true, it seems the only difference between the i3-12100 and i3-13100 (for example) is +100Mhz base clock on the latter (and maybe higher boost). In other words, no added value from RPL IPC improvements for these SKUs.

Seems pretty disingenuous.
This has been confirmed on the most recent presentation leaks

Vl5ei5rPkZnejfNo.jpg
 
Word on the street is Intel plans to use old ADL stock for the low-end RPL SKUs (non-K i5s and lower).

If the leaks are true, it seems the only difference between the i3-12100 and i3-13100 (for example) is +100Mhz base clock on the latter (and maybe higher boost). In other words, no added value from RPL IPC improvements.

Seems pretty disingenuous.
What if these low end processors come with extra cores compared to their predecessors? That would justify renaming, right?
 
From lagging behind in AVX the situation is that Raptor Lake will ship only with AVX2 and Zen 4 with AVX512? My mind can't process this.

Intel really didn't had a choice here?

Raptor's just a fill in product because of 7 nm delays. They weren't going to do something major like add AVX-512 to the E cores. Although I believe the situation hasn't changed with Meteor either.
 
From lagging behind in AVX the situation is that Raptor Lake will ship only with AVX2 and Zen 4 with AVX512? My mind can't process this.

Intel really didn't had a choice here?
Just like performance/watt, it is only an important parameter if Intel has an edge over the competition. 😛

I guess that Intel can diversify their product stack, and with the heat ADL/RPL already dissipating, then raw performance is more important than AVX512, but also would take up die space. So AVX512 is only present in their Xeon products.

AMD on the other hand uses the same CCD for all their products, so they can't diversify to the same degree.
 
Back
Top