Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
In the case of health or rape, an abortion should never be denied. I?m against the frivolous use of it as a contraceptive, where as this case represents the most valid reason for terminating the pregnancy.
um...this isnt about abortion....
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That medical supervisor should be fired, and his/her credentials should be permanently revoked. That person does not belong in a health care position.
Originally posted by: The Yeti
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That medical supervisor should be fired, and his/her credentials should be permanently revoked. That person does not belong in a health care position.
+1
On a side note, I fail to see the relation between this and Bush. Was he the medical supervisor? I did not see that listed in the article.
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: The Yeti
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That medical supervisor should be fired, and his/her credentials should be permanently revoked. That person does not belong in a health care position.
+1
On a side note, I fail to see the relation between this and Bush. Was he the medical supervisor? I did not see that listed in the article.
Who said anything about Bush? 😕
The crucial differences lie in the lack of choice to the rape victim in this case (who could hardly walk out of jail to go to a different pharmacist) and in the betrayal of the public trust by the medical supervisor. As a public employee, she gave up her right to make these kind of decisions based on her personal beliefs while on the job.Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
I'm surprised the medical supervisor isn't getting more support - pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions have had plenty of backers, so what's the difference? It doesn't matter that she was raped; we've heard this over and over again.
So really, where are the people who think this is perfectly fine? Step up already!