• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

rape town changes its slogan

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I'm not actually asking what canola is, I'm pointing out that the article can't seem to stay consistent on this point. First they say canola is a variety of rapeseed, but then they say that canola has vastly supplanted rapeseed production in the town.
Journalism school, for when you can't use logic but still want to control what other people think.

Journalism, for when the College of Education is whipping your ass but you still want a degree.
 
Journalism school, for when you can't use logic but still want to control what other people think.

Journalism, for when the College of Education is whipping your ass but you still want a degree.

So, the problem with a weak media today is to assume that it is unfixable and label all of those that aspire towards journalism as useless losers?

K
 
So, the problem with a weak media today is to assume that it is unfixable and label all of those that aspire towards journalism as useless losers?

K
Might want to read your post and clean it up a bit. Right now its question makes no logical sense. Observing a fact in no way implies that it is unchangeable; it is merely an observation. And I wouldn't claim that all who aspire to be journalists are useless losers. A great deal of them are in it to control society.
 
bCzE0ke.jpg
 
Might want to read your post and clean it up a bit. Right now its question makes no logical sense. Observing a fact in no way implies that it is unchangeable; it is merely an observation. And I wouldn't claim that all who aspire to be journalists are useless losers. A great deal of them are in it to control society.

what is with the wave of ultra-right superparanoia this week? something in the weather? 😀

tell me, how do you inform yourself?
 
So, the problem with a weak media today is to assume that it is unfixable and label all of those that aspire towards journalism as useless losers?

K

To be fair, I doubt an awful lot of people who write for online news sites have journalism degrees.

what is with the wave of ultra-right superparanoia this week? something in the weather? 😀

tell me, how do you inform yourself?

Would it make you feel better if I said right wingers use the media to manipulate people too? 😛
 
Sorry, but the blame lies on any townfolks dumb enough to advertise as the "land of rape and honey"--you know, those signs are expressly there to summarize your town's quality for those "unpleasant outsider types" who are unfortunate enough to be visiting, much less simply passing through.

And you goddamn know that if you were driving through Whatsitville you would have stopped to take a photo of that sign, with a thumbsup, maybe, or a disgust/shocked expression, and facebooked it for your entire clan.

Your false rage projected at the wrong audience is quite insulting, I must say. :colbert:

Tehn be insulted, no one fucking cares. 🙄
 
what is with the wave of ultra-right superparanoia this week? something in the weather? 😀

tell me, how do you inform yourself?
Um, "ultra-right superparanoia"? As Exophase says, this is not simply a left wing problem. Since the Vietnam war, journalism has become advocacy-oriented. The right has Fox News, and the left has . . . Well, pretty much everyone except Fox News. As for how I inform myself, I look for the ones I consider better than most (Christian Science Monitor, CFR, NPR, ABC Radio News, the Beeb) as well as looking at what each side's agitproppers are spouting. If it's an issue of importance to me, then I try to go back to primary sources as much as possible. I listen to CNN Headline News in the morning, and if I'm home (very seldom) I'll catch Brett Baier on Fox News.
 
Um, "ultra-right superparanoia"? As Exophase says, this is not simply a left wing problem. Since the Vietnam war, journalism has become advocacy-oriented. The right has Fox News, and the left has . . . Well, pretty much everyone except Fox News. As for how I inform myself, I look for the ones I consider better than most (Christian Science Monitor, CFR, NPR, ABC Radio News, the Beeb) as well as looking at what each side's agitproppers are spouting. If it's an issue of importance to me, then I try to go back to primary sources as much as possible. I listen to CNN Headline News in the morning, and if I'm home (very seldom) I'll catch Brett Baier on Fox News.

OK, so you do find great use in journalism. I read your earlier comments as all-inclusive of journalists being either college-aged losers or control-oriented fascists. 😀

Yes, of course there are rampant problems all over media, but what I read was "set fire to the whole thing and let's just forget it ever happened" type of solution.
 
Um, "ultra-right superparanoia"? As Exophase says, this is not simply a left wing problem. Since the Vietnam war, journalism has become advocacy-oriented. The right has Fox News, and the left has . . . Well, pretty much everyone except Fox News. As for how I inform myself, I look for the ones I consider better than most (Christian Science Monitor, CFR, NPR, ABC Radio News, the Beeb) as well as looking at what each side's agitproppers are spouting. If it's an issue of importance to me, then I try to go back to primary sources as much as possible. I listen to CNN Headline News in the morning, and if I'm home (very seldom) I'll catch Brett Baier on Fox News.

If I watch news on TV it's HLN, all the rest are trash.
 
Its not really fake. People just aren't educated anymore, like you I guess since you don't understand.

Sometimes one definition of a word is powerful enough that other uses fall out of favor.

No one really refers to happy people as "gay" anymore.

Tisdale is a beautiful little town, great community to live in

Especially if you like rape and honey. And rape.

Yes, I said rape twice...
 
OK, so you do find great use in journalism. I read your earlier comments as all-inclusive of journalists being either college-aged losers or control-oriented fascists. 😀

Yes, of course there are rampant problems all over media, but what I read was "set fire to the whole thing and let's just forget it ever happened" type of solution.
Dunno I'd say great use. It's more like only having a piece of flint, but really needing to get to the meaty goodness of today's kill without eating singed fur . . . 😉

If I watch news on TV it's HLN, all the rest are trash.
HLN in the morning - at some point in the day it too becomes trash.

Sometimes one definition of a word is powerful enough that other uses fall out of favor.

No one really refers to happy people as "gay" anymore.



Especially if you like rape and honey. And rape.

Yes, I said rape twice...
Good point,

and

😀
 
Back
Top