Originally posted by: RayH
In some cases it can be cheaper to throw the old printer away and buy a new one when the ink runs out.
Originally posted by: rezinn
Learn how to use your black cartridge to print black and white.
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: Ns1
grayscale printing ftw?
yes, my rant is that even greyscale it still uses the color cartridges, which is BS. and wont let you print without them, period.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Because it uses CMYK for the color?
and there is an extra black only cartridge too
wow that's pretty shitty
the canon i have at home tries that shit too. all black page, won't print cuz of no color cartridges
grayscale pwns that shit though
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Greed
A more expensive printer will not have this issue. When you buy a cheapo printer you are paying a cost that the manufacturer EXPECTS you to subsidize with ink purchases.
The 3210 is about $250-ish (or was when I picked it up for my mom), which is actually rather high for a personal printer. The highest personal printers you usually see are $350-400, so it's still up there compared to those cheap $50-100 printers.
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
I read somewhere that the markup for printer ink is something like $10,000 profit per gallon.
I have no links or proof of this so it could be completely wrong, but if you think about it, you get so little ink in those catridges and they cost you like $30-50 MSRP.
Hah, I'm using a DeskJet 648C (probably at least a decade old as well). The printer is a piece of junk, I have to feed it one page at a time or else it jams. As little printing as I do, though, I've just kept on using it. I don't really need anything better, so I figure might as well keep running the printer until it keels over. No need to toss it in a landfill yet.Originally posted by: Nohr
I have a friend still using an old HP DeskJet 672C. It must be around 10 years old now. Anyway, it absolutely will not print at all without having a color cartridge inserted. Having it set to color or B&W doesn't matter, it refuses to print. He doesn't print color much at all so he leaves an old dried up color cartridge in it. The printer doesn't seem to care that it's empty, just that it's there. Pretty ridiculous.
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: Ns1
grayscale printing ftw?
yes, my rant is that even greyscale it still uses the color cartridges, which is BS. and wont let you print without them, period.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Because it uses CMYK for the color?
and there is an extra black only cartridge too
That's an absurd comment. A mid-range product isn't good enough for home use?Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: manly
I've got an HP OfficeJet d145 that's getting a bit older now. I rarely print with it as that's what the laser printer is for. The color ink has always depleted at nearly the same rate as black ink, even though I rarely ever print in color.
Worse still, even though the duty cycle has been very low (no more than 400 pages a year), all 3 color printheads need replacement ($34 each). Each printhead is rated at up to 30,000 pages!
IIRC it was about a $400 printer, so it wasn't worth the money. Since I do use the scanner on a regular basis, it hasn't been a total bust.
it's not HPs fault that you bought a small-business class machine for home use. All printheads dry up over time without regular use.
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: conehead433
Under printing preferences don't you have a grayscale printing box you can check. My Canon does and I would assume most recently made printers have that option.
l2r?
Originally posted by: manly
That's an absurd comment. A mid-range product isn't good enough for home use?Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: manly
I've got an HP OfficeJet d145 that's getting a bit older now. I rarely print with it as that's what the laser printer is for. The color ink has always depleted at nearly the same rate as black ink, even though I rarely ever print in color.
Worse still, even though the duty cycle has been very low (no more than 400 pages a year), all 3 color printheads need replacement ($34 each). Each printhead is rated at up to 30,000 pages!
IIRC it was about a $400 printer, so it wasn't worth the money. Since I do use the scanner on a regular basis, it hasn't been a total bust.
it's not HPs fault that you bought a small-business class machine for home use. All printheads dry up over time without regular use.
Originally posted by: Izusaga
The real answer: Because small amounts of color are typically used for black and white printing, presumably to force you to have to replace cartridges early.
We have a $800 HP Laser Printer that shows a record of some 32000 pages of black and white and ZERO color (photo replication so this printer is color capable but is NOT used to print color images of any kind - we have specialized equipment for that). The stat sheet for the printer shows ONE color page printed, and that was the test page for the printer upon install.
It currently shows all 3 color cartridges as empty. They were full when purchased. Fancy that.
Originally posted by: StrangeRanger
PC Load Letter
j
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: Izusaga
The real answer: Because small amounts of color are typically used for black and white printing, presumably to force you to have to replace cartridges early.
We have a $800 HP Laser Printer that shows a record of some 32000 pages of black and white and ZERO color (photo replication so this printer is color capable but is NOT used to print color images of any kind - we have specialized equipment for that). The stat sheet for the printer shows ONE color page printed, and that was the test page for the printer upon install.
It currently shows all 3 color cartridges as empty. They were full when purchased. Fancy that.
Those gas siphoning idiots attacked the printer =P
Originally posted by: MotionMan
Originally posted by: StrangeRanger
PC Load Letter
j
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN!!!
MotionMan
