rant by a lady who isn't too impressed with metrosexuals

[KarenMarie]

i agree with a lot of what her rant said. sorry, but men are not suopposed to be hair free and sweet smelling. men are supposed to be masculine. shaven bodies and waxed eyebrows are not masculine.

i am a bit older, and remember the guys she describes from the 80's. and while i think she went way ott in her description... there is something to be said for a guy looking and smelling like a guy. but... to each his own. some women are turned on by the guys who are maticulous about their finger nails, chest hair and pedicures. they prefer a guy who appears to never get dirty, owns more hair products then they do. kewl... whatever floats their boat.

but there are many of women... like me.. who like the clean but skruffy look that caring about other things before a facial brings. beat up jeans, flannel shirts and day old stubble is atractive/sexy imho. i prefer to have a guy that i can feel safe and protected in their arms ... than to have one i can share hair gel with.

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: Yaotl

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I'm no metro, but this skank doesn't sound like the kind of quality woman that I'd date. She sounds like trailer trash.

yea. she sure does.

Why? Because she prefers the Sean Connery Bond to the poof Roger Moore?

Sean Connery Bond was clean cut and never had a hair out of place. Did you ever see him in a beater and mullet?

Is that what she said she likes? Or is that being implied by others?

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
What's wrong with wanting to be one step further from the ape?

Nothing. But going "metro" is a step in the wrong direction.

How is that?

In the evolutionary sense, if we take a step backwards we act like apes, if we take a step forward we act like civilized humans, and if we take a step sideways like the metros do, we act like fruits.

What exactly does that mean to you? Fruits? Because I don't see any metrosexual acting like an orange or an apple.
Perhaps any step forward we make will be condemned by a backassward society who thinks traditional roles are the way to go, and fears change, even at the cost of progress as a species?

 

[Yaotl]

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER

Originally posted by: Yaotl

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I'm no metro, but this skank doesn't sound like the kind of quality woman that I'd date. She sounds like trailer trash.

yea. she sure does.

Why? Because she prefers the Sean Connery Bond to the poof Roger Moore?

Sean Connery Bond was clean cut and never had a hair out of place. Did you ever see him in a beater and mullet?

Is that what she said she likes? Or is that being implied by others?

You were the one that brought it up. Get a better example or shut up.

 

[Bar81]

That writeup was superior. A woman that isn't gay (ie hates metros) is a nice change of pace, LA was horrible with all the chicks who wanted to date chicks with d*cks.

 

[shimsham]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
What's wrong with wanting to be one step further from the ape?

Nothing. But going "metro" is a step in the wrong direction.

How is that?

In the evolutionary sense, if we take a step backwards we act like apes, if we take a step forward we act like civilized humans, and if we take a step sideways like the metros do, we act like fruits.

Well, if it is the metrosexual males getting the so-called poon, then it is the metrosexuals reproducing, passing on their genes, while the old style neanderthals will die out.

hahahaha what? metrosexual is genetic now? its a trend. i think youre too smart to believe that aidan, and youre just dumping gas on the thread.

Why are you all turning into the high-maintenance, self-absorbed women you used to get so annoyed by? Why do you claim to hate insecure chicks, yet now you have to change everything about your body? It isn?t a lie that for most girls, personality is more important than looks. My aforementioned late 1990?s ex was a sexy, balding, hairy-backed beast with a killer sense of humor. And no, he wasn?t rich!

Please men, just be yourself. Butch lesbians are more manly than most of you these days, and unfortunately, they just don?t do it for me.

thats my favorite part. its not so much that men are taking "better care" or "dressing better", its just that theyre going overboard with it and acting like chicks.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Bar81
That writeup was superior. A woman that isn't gay (ie hates metros) is a nice change of pace, LA was horrible with all the chicks who wanted to date chicks with d*cks.

that's interesting, so you're saying in LA the "chicks" prefer metrosexuals?

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
What's wrong with wanting to be one step further from the ape?

Nothing. But going "metro" is a step in the wrong direction.

How is that?

In the evolutionary sense, if we take a step backwards we act like apes, if we take a step forward we act like civilized humans, and if we take a step sideways like the metros do, we act like fruits.

What exactly does that mean to you? Fruits? Because I don't see any metrosexual acting like an orange or an apple.

His comment was just the usual homophobia. I assume by 'fruits' he means gay people. He's saying that gay people aren't civilized, and that to act like gay people is a step backwards.

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Perhaps any step forward we make will be condemned by a backassward society who thinks traditional roles are the way to go, and fears change, even at the cost of progress as a species?

I think heterosexuals could learn a great deal from gay people.

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: Yaotl

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER

Originally posted by: Yaotl

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I'm no metro, but this skank doesn't sound like the kind of quality woman that I'd date. She sounds like trailer trash.

yea. she sure does.

Why? Because she prefers the Sean Connery Bond to the poof Roger Moore?

Sean Connery Bond was clean cut and never had a hair out of place. Did you ever see him in a beater and mullet?

Is that what she said she likes? Or is that being implied by others?

You were the one that brought it up. Get a better example or shut up.

Bad answer. First, you can't shut me up, you can suggest it but I am not inclined to do so@this time. Connery was as hairy as a monkey so it was an excellent example. Obviously you had no intelligent response and your estimation of the "example's" viability means nothing to me

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Bar81
That writeup was superior. A woman that isn't gay (ie hates metros) is a nice change of pace, LA was horrible with all the chicks who wanted to date chicks with d*cks.

that's interesting, so you're saying in LA the "chicks" prefer metrosexuals?

if you goto any of the upscale clubs with the most hot girls around, the club is fille dwith metros......this isnt just LA......its consumed the north east(nYc,boston...etc)

 

[Bar81]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Bar81
That writeup was superior. A woman that isn't gay (ie hates metros) is a nice change of pace, LA was horrible with all the chicks who wanted to date chicks with d*cks.

that's interesting, so you're saying in LA the "chicks" prefer metrosexuals?

I'm not saying all the women, just in LA proper they seem to like women mascarading as men, bizarre and something I never understood. Apparently, being a guy just doesn't do it for women anymore???

Even better than that article is this:

http://tommyblaze.blogspot.com/2005/04/what-do-you-get-when-you-cross-man.html

 

[shimsham]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
What's wrong with wanting to be one step further from the ape?

Nothing. But going "metro" is a step in the wrong direction.

How is that?

In the evolutionary sense, if we take a step backwards we act like apes, if we take a step forward we act like civilized humans, and if we take a step sideways like the metros do, we act like fruits.

What exactly does that mean to you? Fruits? Because I don't see any metrosexual acting like an orange or an apple.
Perhaps any step forward we make will be condemned by a backassward society who thinks traditional roles are the way to go, and fears change, even at the cost of progress as a species?

surely youre not equating fashion as progression of a species.

metrosexual is just what it says. metro. those that live in the city have dont have to do yardwork, or fix their own cars, etc. those things that guys living in the suburbs and rurual areas do all the time that over rides any desire to trim the back hair, or gel up, or shave their chest, or smell good and lotiony. progresson of a species has nothing to do with it, but environment is a major factor, IMO.

 

[aidanjm]

 

[Looney]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: mordantmonkey

Originally posted by: jjzelinski
I just can't wrap my brain around the fact that men are deliberately tossing away their gender intrinsic liberties. Simplicity the best part about being a guy, why piss that away?

i've been accused of being a metrosexual. but rest assured i don't own any hair products. a straightedge razor, shaving cream, a toothbrush, bar of soap. that's all. i just tend to dress better than the camaro driving mullet heads this hairy-twatted woman is after.

I'm not so sure I believe her twat really is hairy, tho. I sort of wonder how much of the article is real, and how much is exaggerated to make it "funny". She doesn't look like she's have a hairy twat from the picture.

HOW the hell can you tell if her twat is hairy or not by a pic of her face? HOW?!

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
What's wrong with wanting to be one step further from the ape?

Nothing. But going "metro" is a step in the wrong direction.

How is that?

One step away from sucking off men at the bus stop for fare

cos gay men suck off men at the bus stop for fare, right?

don't believe I said that maybe you need to keep away from your Jump to Conclusions mat

 

[alien42]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
So what does SHE look like?

pic

ill grow a mullet for that

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: PingSpike
Currently, "metrosexuals" or whatever, are getting the poon..

The only people who claim that metrosexuals are getting anything are the metrosexuals themselves.

In reality the metrosexuals are the same group that is always using lame tactics to get women. The reason they do this is because women won't go after them otherwise. They're a bunch of inferior "men" who always got passed over in favor of the studly football QB type. Women are going to go after the more "manly" guy regardless. If one of them dresses up like a metro, then once again he'll take all the women away from the lesser, effeminate, metros.

Think of it this way- if you're a scrawny 5'6 120 lb guy, what else are you going to do? Of course you're going to invent some act.

 

[shimsham]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Most heterosexual people are stupid, ignorance, whatever. I think that gay people are better than heterosexual people, in general.

heterophobic? what makes you any different than a homophobe?

 

[Yaotl]

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Bad answer. First, you can't shut me up, you can suggest it but I am not inclined to do so@this time. Connery was as hairy as a monkey so it was an excellent example. Obviously you had no intelligent response and your estimation of the "example's" viability means nothing to me

This is hairy as a monkey?

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Well, if it is the metrosexual males getting the so-called poon, then it is the metrosexuals reproducing, passing on their genes, while the old style males will die out.

The reality of the matter is that they're not getting the poon. While they're at the bath&body works complimenting their other metro friends on their choice of hairstyle, the girl they call their "girlfriend" is back at home getting slammed by the same type of crude jock that the metro despises.

 

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: PingSpike
Currently, "metrosexuals" or whatever, are getting the poon..

The only people who claim that metrosexuals are getting anything are the metrosexuals themselves.

In reality the metrosexuals are the same group that is always using lame tactics to get women. The reason they do this is because women won't go after them otherwise. They're a bunch of inferior "men" who always got passed over in favor of the studly football QB type. Women are going to go after the more "manly" guy regardless. If one of them dresses up like a metro, then once again he'll take all the women away from the lesser, effeminate, metros.

Think of it this way- if you're a scrawny 5'6 120 lb guy, what else are you going to do? Of course you're going to invent some act.

I've seen remarkably few guys that were scrawny that I would classify as metros.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: shimsham

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Most heterosexual people are stupid, ignorance, whatever. I think that gay people are better than heterosexual people, in general.

heterophobic? what makes you any different than a homophobe?

oops. that was a joke, didn't mean to post that.

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Well, if it is the metrosexual males getting the so-called poon, then it is the metrosexuals reproducing, passing on their genes, while the old style males will die out.

The reality of the matter is that they're not getting the poon. While they're at the bath&body works complimenting their other metro friends on their choice of hairstyle, the girl they call their "girlfriend" is back at home getting slammed by the same type of crude jock that the metro despises.

lol, you'd like that to be the case, wouldn't you, neanderthal man

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: Yaotl

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Bad answer. First, you can't shut me up, you can suggest it but I am not inclined to do so@this time. Connery was as hairy as a monkey so it was an excellent example. Obviously you had no intelligent response and your estimation of the "example's" viability means nothing to me

This is hairy as a monkey?

My bad, should have specified body hair, like in this pic I just googled up

Mike Myers is making fun of his being hairy with the Powers chest hair patch, I'd say he was known for his hairy manliness, and rough and ready persona. Instead of the foppish moore.

 

[shimsham]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: shimsham

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Most heterosexual people are stupid, ignorance, whatever. I think that gay people are better than heterosexual people, in general.

heterophobic? what makes you any different than a homophobe?

oops. that was a joke, didn't mean to post that.

maybe you didnt mean to post it, but i doubt it being a joke.