• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rambo IV

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sorry RAMBO is not the movie for you, stick to Perry Como's "Blowing Bubbles Anthology" and live your life to the fullest.
 
Originally posted by: ColdFusion718
Originally posted by: sandorski
You ever see a Rambo movie? Plot? Hell, Dialogue doesn't matter. Just give Rambo a Place, Bad Guys, and some Guns. He'll do the rest.

He doesn't even need guns. Just start him off with a knife.

Ahh, true.
 
Hey... any movie that portrays the Burmese Junta as a bunch of heartless violent savages isn't all bad.

Considering how they treated their typhoon victims, it seems that the movie got that part pretty much spot on.
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: ColdFusion718
Originally posted by: sandorski
You ever see a Rambo movie? Plot? Hell, Dialogue doesn't matter. Just give Rambo a Place, Bad Guys, and some Guns. He'll do the rest.

He doesn't even need guns. Just start him off with a knife.

Ahh, true.


Of course the preferred weapon of choice is the Compound Bow with Explosive Arrow Tips (Some assembly required.)
 
I enjoyed it but wouldn't say it was great. And if you're bringing this up, you must not have seen the prior ones.
 
Originally posted by: vhx
The worst you have ever seen in a movie? You must not watch any movies at all.

I thought it was great.

Yeah, I guess he didnt see Robin Hood: Men in Tights.
THAT is the worst movie ever made, and I like Mel Brooks films.
 
I watched it last night.

1. Good body count.
2. Good Violence.
3. Same acting.

The only thing I didn't like about it was how short it seemed. I felt like something really big should have happened at the end. When the ending came, I wasn't ready for it. I was thinking, "is that it?"
 
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
I thought it was better then 2 and 3 by far (like thats hard to do) but nothing close to First Blood.

I agree. I think they went a little over the top and made the violence too unrealistic (i.e. heads blown clean off with the sniper rifle, the size and power of the bomb explosion). I'm actually looking forward to Rambo V, which will apparently be a drama rather than an action movie.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
I thought it was better then 2 and 3 by far (like thats hard to do) but nothing close to First Blood.

I agree. I think they went a little over the top and made the violence too unrealistic (i.e. heads blown clean off with the sniper rifle, the size and power of the bomb explosion). I'm actually looking forward to Rambo V, which will apparently be a drama rather than an action movie.

It was a .50 cal sinper rifle. I think that would remove a head easily. The only part that I though was unrealistic was Rambo wearing a Panerai watch.
 
Expected a pointless blood and guts movie and that's what I got. I don't see the point in going into movies nowadays with high expectations as you will always be let down.

Sometimes I wonder how many film critic's there are on ATOT and whether have they been happy with any film in the last 20 years with the stuff that comes out of Hollywood's sphincter.
 
Did you catch the part where they stab that kid in the stomach? And then throw the other kid into a burning building? Looked pretty good to me!
 
Back
Top