Rage & hate in this forum

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Is it possible that, because of the acute crisis facing this country, people are kind of scared and feel more strongly and more intensely about issues and their views?
 

razor2025

Diamond Member
May 24, 2002
3,010
0
71
Awesome, the thread is already derailed to a issue fest.

Back to the OP. It's a guilty self-punishment/pleasure of mine to even read or engage in P&N, because almost everyone here is intellectually dishonest, bigotted, hypocritical, and unwilling for compromise. So despite the fact that I try my best to engage in a civil debate, it's a lost cause to seek changes in opinion OR a concession. You can corner someone all day, but they'll simply move on to the next thread spouting off the same nonsensical idiocy.

Ars's Soapbox is slightly better than here. At least the idiot you cornered might have 1% chance of reform. Though, usually they come back 3-5 threads later unreformed.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Is it possible that, because of the acute crisis facing this country, people are kind of scared and feel more strongly and more intensely about issues and their views?

Its probable its just made us bigger self-interested assholes.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
Is it possible that, because of the acute crisis facing this country, people are kind of scared and feel more strongly and more intensely about issues and their views?

I'd say that it's more accurate to say that the current environment in this country makes it easier for a dishonest media to change emotions of uncertainty and fear into raw anger through the use of lies and outright distortion.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Reading a thread on Howard Zinn, I am getting more and more disturbed about the rage and hate expressed in this forum.

Are people legitimately thinking about the issues, or are the AnandTech forums more of a punching bag for people to work out their personal issues?

On the flip side, maybe it is good that we know where people in America stand. I think people write things here that they would not say in public.

For example, this was written in a recent thread:



Perhaps here in P&N, the true nature of where we stand as a nation is revealed: widespread racism, distrust & open hatred of fellow citizens, disdain for the less fortunate.

Is this the kind of nation we want? The kind of legacy we want to pass to the next generation?

Calling out or disliking Obama, even personally, isn't racism, no matter how much you like him. Racism is the belief that one race is inherently superior or inferior to another. Insisting that Obama not be subject to the same sort of criticisms as are other politicians comes perilously close to racism, implying that he is "special" and cannot stand up to the same treatment as can white politicians.

As for the other, my real name is on my profile; this is true for every political forum I frequent. So I am by definition saying the same things I say in public - although I admit I'm much nicer to idiots in public. Usually. But then idiots tend to know they are idiots and don't try to pretend otherwise in real life.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Reading a thread on Howard Zinn, I am getting more and more disturbed about the rage and hate expressed in this forum.

Are people legitimately thinking about the issues, or are the AnandTech forums more of a punching bag for people to work out their personal issues?

On the flip side, maybe it is good that we know where people in America stand. I think people write things here that they would not say in public.

For example, this was written in a recent thread:



Perhaps here in P&N, the true nature of where we stand as a nation is revealed: widespread racism, distrust & open hatred of fellow citizens, disdain for the less fortunate.

Is this the kind of nation we want? The kind of legacy we want to pass to the next generation?

You know what I think? I think people who inject personal insults into each of their posts is just a pathetic loser. They seriously piss me off. I bet they weren't held enough as a child, and that their mothers had small boobs. What a bunch of stupid pathetic assholes.

Oh, and another thing. They're totally not self-aware.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
You know what I think? I think people who inject personal insults into each of their posts is just a pathetic loser. They seriously piss me off. I bet they weren't held enough as a child, and that their mothers had small boobs. What a bunch of stupid pathetic assholes.

Oh, and another thing. They're totally not self-aware.

Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
I could careless . Who reads or don't. Am I lonely , Yes Lonely for peace, A loving world a caring world . But the Britt above hasn't a clue to who he bows to . Thats just plain nationalism . I just post because I am bored so I throw in my 2 cents. Whether not I believe what I write is for you to determine. For if the events Of the coming year shall give you pause . I just don't care what Most of ThinK . What I care about is whats happening right now . Its ugly enjoy it . I don't Hate jews its zionist that I loath. Its people like Rothschild that Jedi worships
reduce the dose...

Or increase it? :awe:
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Well theres 2 types.

1) Wants to take money from the working class to share it with everyone
2) Wants to keep what they have worked for

Obviously these 2 types will never get along. Its just getting more heated lately because group 1 wants to take more and more.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
stateofbeasley...this is nothing compared to the Novak obit thread from a few months ago...which btw has since mysteriously disappeared.
 

SR1729

Senior member
Jan 11, 2010
602
0
0
Just a passer by, but I can't help but acknowledge that this thread appears to have been started (and continued by others) in an attempt to paint the right as the "nastier side", all the while JohnOfSheffield is shorting out on a bad roid rage trip.

Suicide might be a valid solution for your meager brain, but if not, at least never reproduce you stupid fuck.

Was surprised that it had gone unnoticed this long, so there's my 0.02. I'm sure I'll soon be instructed to stop using my head to have sex with my butt.
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Well theres 2 types.

1) Wants to take money from the working class to share it with everyone
2) Wants to keep what they have worked for

Obviously these 2 types will never get along. Its just getting more heated lately because group 1 wants to take more and more.


ROFL! typical right wing brilliance, generalize the world into two buckets
good hard working americans and nogood welfare class commies:)

You can't really believe that 3rd grade logic?

If you really must look at things in such a simplistic manner, at least you could title the groups correctly. Rich vs. poor or Wealthy vs. not wealthy would be more accurate.

And I'll give you a clue, your working class is in the not wealthy group, and the wealthy class is who's taking their hard earned dollars and they most certainly aren't sharing with everyone.

As long as we are making stupid bi polar categorization heres one for ya. You can break down the right wingers that claim to support the working class into two groups
1. Rich people lying their ass off for political gain, that could care less about the working class
2. Stupid blind sheeple that believe the Wolf in sheeps clothing is their savior
 
Last edited:

JockoJohnson

Golden Member
May 20, 2009
1,417
60
91
ROFL! typical right wing brilliance, generalize the world into two buckets
good hard working americans and nogood welfare class commies:)

You can't really believe that 3rd grade logic?

If you really must look at things in such a simplistic manner, at least you could title the groups correctly. Rich vs. poor or Wealthy vs. not wealthy would be more accurate.

And I'll give you a clue, your working class is in the not wealthy group, and the wealthy class is who's taking their hard earned dollars and they most certainly aren't sharing with everyone.

As long as we are making stupid bi polar categorization heres one for ya. You can break down the right wingers that claim to support the working class into to groups
1. Rich people lying their ass off for political gain, that could care less about the working class
2. Stupid blind sheeple that believe the Wolf in sheeps clothing is their savior

Wow, you could say the exact same thing about left wingers..unless you believe left wingers can't be rich.

And before you say that the left care about the working class, why has the war on poverty been going on for 30+ years? (I know, that is the lower class but close enough in this economy). Maybe that is a war that we should withdraw from.

And point #2 fits perfectly with the man in charge now.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Wow, you could say the exact same thing about left wingers..unless you believe left wingers can't be rich.

And before you say that the left care about the working class, why has the war on poverty been going on for 30+ years? (I know, that is the lower class but close enough in this economy). Maybe that is a war that we should withdraw from.

Jocko, meet some facts. Some facts, meet Jocko.

The 'war on poverty' was fought briefly by Democrats in the 60's. We were winning - the percent of Americans under the poverty line was cut by a third.

Some changes were made that lasted - and the reduced rate of poverty has continued pretty flat (a bit up under Republicans, a bit down under Democrats) every since.

The war has been for the rich since reagan.
 

JockoJohnson

Golden Member
May 20, 2009
1,417
60
91
Jocko, meet some facts. Some facts, meet Jocko.

The 'war on poverty' was fought briefly by Democrats in the 60's. We were winning - the percent of Americans under the poverty line was cut by a third.

Some changes were made that lasted - and the reduced rate of poverty has continued pretty flat (a bit up under Republicans, a bit down under Democrats) every since.

The war has been for the rich since reagan.

Craig, I agree with you on the war for the rich...that needs to end as well. It seems that there are just way too many tax breaks done in the name of job creation and trickle down effects.
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
I've been reading P&N for several years. And I am not shy about using harsh/borderline abusive language if people post lies. I remember there was a thread on Gay Marriage where things got pretty bad.

But I draw the line on attacking people based on their race, level of education, geographic location, & other things that are not relevant to the arguments at hand.

It seems like since around 2008, nothing is off limits anymore.

I'm not even sure it's about issues sometimes. A lot of the times it seems like personal destruction is the goal. And I have to wonder if the people who run this website want AnandTech to be known for this kind of behavior. This is not something that goes unnoticed in the web community.


We need to have something to attack them on besides the merits of their arguments. You need to get into the P&N spririt.......
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
Awesome, the thread is already derailed to a issue fest.

Back to the OP. It's a guilty self-punishment/pleasure of mine to even read or engage in P&N, because almost everyone here is intellectually dishonest, bigotted, hypocritical, and unwilling for compromise. So despite the fact that I try my best to engage in a civil debate, it's a lost cause to seek changes in opinion OR a concession. You can corner someone all day, but they'll simply move on to the next thread spouting off the same nonsensical idiocy.

Ars's Soapbox is slightly better than here. At least the idiot you cornered might have 1% chance of reform. Though, usually they come back 3-5 threads later unreformed.


This sorta.

The Rage in this forum is because there are quite a few people everywhere that get very upset when they have what they hold dear questioned by others. Most people respond badly to criticism and it's worse on the internet when people are relatively anonymous so they can bash to their hearts content on each other. Also, I have a feeling that some people are possible "plants" that are posting here for an Agenda. Not as if that hasn't happened before *cough*Rollo from the video forums*cough*.

Personally, some people I don't even bother to usually post against as it's pointless. I try to keep track of who are the nuts on both sides of the party views or just nuts in general and try not to feed the trolls. There is a difference though with discussing with someone who you disagree with over an issue and both sides can come up with intelligent arguments, and having a discussion boil down to pointless name calling on either other posters or politicians or the subject matter.

If you want my list here it is of people I typically wouldn't give the time of day to. Spidery07, JohnOfSheffield, Craig234, Vic, Fear No Evil, Hadcp, AzN, Patranus, TheFlyingPig, and Specop 007.

Here are some I typically disagree with on various issues, although I may not post on every issues, but at least they try in my view to be reasonable, rational, and mostly cordial about stuff. Werepossum, woolfe9999, JEDIYoda, Hayabusa, Zebo, Robor, JPeyton, Palehorse, and quite a few others.

As I said, I don't always agree with them, most of the time I do not, but they are usually reasonable in their views and arguments.

The other thing to mention is that there are some posters here who just jollies playing devil's advocate because they like pushing other people's buttons to rile them up. When you see this, it's just best to move on because nothing you say will matter to them.

My two guiding principles, which I try to stick to are, the Golden Rule and Sometimes if you don't have something nice to say keep your trap shut.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,688
126
Not as if that hasn't happened before *cough*Rollo from the video forums*cough*.

Ugh, I was there for that. It got to the point where you couldn't even talk about an ATI product without getting a wall of text about the superiority of NVidea.
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
This sorta.

The Rage in this forum is because there are quite a few people everywhere that get very upset when they have what they hold dear questioned by others. Most people respond badly to criticism and it's worse on the internet when people are relatively anonymous so they can bash to their hearts content on each other. Also, I have a feeling that some people are possible "plants" that are posting here for an Agenda. Not as if that hasn't happened before *cough*Rollo from the video forums*cough*.

Personally, some people I don't even bother to usually post against as it's pointless. I try to keep track of who are the nuts on both sides of the party views or just nuts in general and try not to feed the trolls. There is a difference though with discussing with someone who you disagree with over an issue and both sides can come up with intelligent arguments, and having a discussion boil down to pointless name calling on either other posters or politicians or the subject matter.

If you want my list here it is of people I typically wouldn't give the time of day to. Spidery07, JohnOfSheffield, Craig234, Vic, Fear No Evil, Hadcp, AzN, Patranus, TheFlyingPig, and Specop 007.

Here are some I typically disagree with on various issues, although I may not post on every issues, but at least they try in my view to be reasonable, rational, and mostly cordial about stuff. Werepossum, woolfe9999, JEDIYoda, Hayabusa, Zebo, Robor, JPeyton, Palehorse, and quite a few others.

As I said, I don't always agree with them, most of the time I do not, but they are usually reasonable in their views and arguments.

The other thing to mention is that there are some posters here who just jollies playing devil's advocate because they like pushing other people's buttons to rile them up. When you see this, it's just best to move on because nothing you say will matter to them.

My two guiding principles, which I try to stick to are, the Golden Rule and Sometimes if you don't have something nice to say keep your trap shut.

I put the number at about a dozen who I feel I could have an intelligent discussion with. Few of those are likely to change their views, but they will at least acknowledge a fact when it's presented, most of the time, and will occasionally make a concession to the other side of the argument. That's among the regular posters. There are a few less regular ones who can occasionally be reasonable.

I have changed my view on topics as a result of other people's posts probably 20 or so times in about 10 or so years I have posted regularly on political chat forums. Come to think of it, that isn't really very often at all, and I'm probably more flexible than most.

- wolf
 

MJinZ

Diamond Member
Nov 4, 2009
8,192
0
0
Reading a thread on Howard Zinn, I am getting more and more disturbed about the rage and hate expressed in this forum.

Are people legitimately thinking about the issues, or are the AnandTech forums more of a punching bag for people to work out their personal issues?

On the flip side, maybe it is good that we know where people in America stand. I think people write things here that they would not say in public.

For example, this was written in a recent thread:



Perhaps here in P&N, the true nature of where we stand as a nation is revealed: widespread racism, distrust & open hatred of fellow citizens, disdain for the less fortunate.

Is this the kind of nation we want? The kind of legacy we want to pass to the next generation?

I do believe the true nature of the nation IS in fact widely racist (to different degrees of course), distrustful (from the government, big oil, big banking, etc) and disdainful for the less fortunate (simply a part of being a capitalistic society).

There is nothing surprising to me though, I mean EVERYTHING in the US of A has been historically about competition. Our laws are inherently adversarial, it's You Vs Me (or rather, your Lawyer vs My Lawyer), our economy is based on cutthroat competition, our education is designed hugely to advance our nation's GDP, as much as our own cultural and intellectual welfare.

You can't really expect the other aspects of life to be not colored in the same vein.

If you were to judge a nation based on how far we have come as humanity goes, the USA is probably the worst example you can give.
 

Skitzer

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2000
4,414
3
81
What you profess to believe and what you say that you want done are two so different things.

You believe in hatred and revenge, you believe that you are correct to judge and condemn, even though you NEVER read anything beyond a headline and are proven a bloody fool in pretty much every thread because of it, which you ignore so you can keep your holier than though attitude going while quite possibly being the most pathetic man to ever visit these forums.

That you lie about your standpoint TWICE by saying that you didn't really mean what you said, something that is somewhat of your trademark to say, is just even more pathetic.

Suicide might be a valid solution for your meager brain, but if not, at least never reproduce you stupid fuck.

Rage and Hate in this forum ......... Hmmmmm maybe a perfect example of what OP was talking about?
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
You guys on the left don't care for the "little guys" as you so often like to say. I just filed federal taxes and I got taxed over 200 bucks from 1000 I dared make on the side. And, I only made around 9k total last year.

Plus, from everything I'm hearing, you want to raise taxes even more.

Thanks a lot. Really. I appreciate it. :rolleyes: