Radeon HD 2900 XT on sale now at ZipZoomfly

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: Nightmare225
Originally posted by: CrystalBay
Text

Completely useless. How many of us have 5 GHz processors? :disgust:

Well, it means the HD 2900XT is faster than the 8800 Ultra in 3D Mark benchmarks. The Ultra WR is 29k~ meanwhile the XT has now beaten 30k, WR for a single card. The processor speed is irrelveant.
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Seeing how 8800 / HD 2900 series cards perform in Lost Planet, our first DX10 game, will be almost as interesting as seeing the R600 performance results on Monday.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Ummm... did anyone else notice that the guy was using dry ice or some other extreme cooling?

I mean, come on, the GPU temp was -13*C.

If you think that is any indication of real world performance, pass me the crack pipe.
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: Matt2
Ummm... did anyone else notice that the guy was using dry ice or some other extreme cooling?

I mean, come on, the GPU temp was -13*C.

If you think that is any indication of real world performance, pass me the crack pipe.

I don't think anyone was suggesting that was an indication of real world performance. It was merely cited as an example of what the R600 core could do when pushed to the limit.

 

tuteja1986

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2005
3,676
0
0
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: Matt2
Ummm... did anyone else notice that the guy was using dry ice or some other extreme cooling?

I mean, come on, the GPU temp was -13*C.

If you think that is any indication of real world performance, pass me the crack pipe.

I don't think anyone was suggesting that was an indication of real world performance. It was merely cited as an example of what the R600 core could do when pushed to the limit.

It's still absolutely useless info.

I'd rather see what it can do on air cooling.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?

What the hell do you mean what is wrong with me?

I'm in love with nvidia because I think someone running a 5.2GHZ C2E and a super cooled R600 3DMock05 run is useless?

If it makes you feel better I think the WR for the 8800u is equally useless and stupid.

Unless you guys plan on playing Crysis and Alan Wake with one hand while continuously dropping dry ice into tube, then that WR should be useless to you too.

I dont know, if not jumping AMD's nuts makes me a fanboy, then color me green.
 

tuteja1986

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2005
3,676
0
0
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?

What the hell do you mean what is wrong with me?

I'm in love with nvidia because I think someone running a 5.2GHZ C2E and a super cooled R600 3DMock05 run is useless?

If it makes you feel better I think the WR for the 8800u is equally useless and stupid.

Unless you guys plan on playing Crysis and Alan Wake with one hand while continuously dropping dry ice into tube, then that WR should be useless to you too.

I dont know, if not jumping AMD's nuts makes me a fanboy, then color me green.

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU ?

This is a Video forum... you know when nvidia release a new GPU we talk about the dude who overclocks it to stupid crazy speed to achieve wacky score. We do that because we are GPU enthusiastic not a idiot gaming joe that get his info from gamespot gpu reviews.
 

Jules

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,213
0
76
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?

What the hell do you mean what is wrong with me?

I'm in love with nvidia because I think someone running a 5.2GHZ C2E and a super cooled R600 3DMock05 run is useless?

If it makes you feel better I think the WR for the 8800u is equally useless and stupid.

Unless you guys plan on playing Crysis and Alan Wake with one hand while continuously dropping dry ice into tube, then that WR should be useless to you too.

I dont know, if not jumping AMD's nuts makes me a fanboy, then color me green.

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU ?

This is a Video forum... you know when nvidia release a new GPU we talk about the dude who overclocks it to stupid crazy speed to achieve wacky score. We do that because we are GPU enthusiastic not a idiot gaming joe that get his info from gamespot gpu reviews.

And this folks is why you go out and get laid instead of worrying about video cards.
 

yacoub

Golden Member
May 24, 2005
1,991
14
81
Originally posted by: MyStupidMouth
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?

What the hell do you mean what is wrong with me?

I'm in love with nvidia because I think someone running a 5.2GHZ C2E and a super cooled R600 3DMock05 run is useless?

If it makes you feel better I think the WR for the 8800u is equally useless and stupid.

Unless you guys plan on playing Crysis and Alan Wake with one hand while continuously dropping dry ice into tube, then that WR should be useless to you too.

I dont know, if not jumping AMD's nuts makes me a fanboy, then color me green.

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU ?

This is a Video forum... you know when nvidia release a new GPU we talk about the dude who overclocks it to stupid crazy speed to achieve wacky score. We do that because we are GPU enthusiastic not a idiot gaming joe that get his info from gamespot gpu reviews.

And this folks is why you go out and get laid instead of worrying about video cards.

WHAAAAAAAAAT. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE. UR CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZY. BLARRRRRRRRRGH
*wipes drool from mouth with forearm*
NEEEEEEEEEEEED MOOOOOOOOORE GEEE PEEE YUUUU
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR600







:D
 

Wreckage

Banned
Jul 1, 2005
5,529
0
0
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:
 

yacoub

Golden Member
May 24, 2005
1,991
14
81
I'm going to run my four-way crossfire'd R600 X2900XTXTXTXTXs submerged in polar bear pee. They'll run so cold I'll get NEGATIVE 3DMark06 scores because it'll go back in time and poke the 3DMark06 development team in the back of the head.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:

Just out of interest, is there a special someone in your life, who loves you for what you are?

They must be a wonderful, tolerant person, if they exist :thumbsup:
 

Wreckage

Banned
Jul 1, 2005
5,529
0
0
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:

Just out of interest, is there a special someone in your life, who loves you for what you are?

They must be a wonderful, tolerant person, if they exist :thumbsup:

Don't worry, I'm sure you will find someone. Cut back on the postcount maybe.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:

Just out of interest, is there a special someone in your life, who loves you for what you are?

They must be a wonderful, tolerant person, if they exist :thumbsup:

Don't worry, I'm sure you will find someone. Cut back on the postcount maybe.

Zing! :(















;):beer:
 

tuteja1986

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2005
3,676
0
0
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:

Go fall off a cliff you Nvidia blind fanboy !
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Go fall off a cliff you Nvidia blind fanboy !

Keep that up, you may find yourself taking an unexpected vacation.

You muttering the word "Fanboy" leaves the irony meter broken.
 

Wreckage

Banned
Jul 1, 2005
5,529
0
0
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Extelleron

Let's forget the argument that the XT will be nearly as fast as the GTX.
Yeah because it's not even close.
The XT is at least 20% faster than the GTS, even your beloved DT benchmarks agree with that. Since when is spending 14% more ($400 vs $350) for 20% better performance a bad deal?

The XT was losing many benchmarks to the GTS at any decent resolution.

I guess if you use liquid nitrogen it might pull ahead. :laugh:

Go fall of a cliff you Nvidia blind fanboy !

LOL! You need to take a break from this. To get so upset you would wish injury upon me. I can only guess that you need to leave your parents basement and maybe find a life partner.

Besides, I am basing my statements on all currently available data. What are you basing your insults on? Have a drink, relax and enjoy the ride that is AT Video.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: tuteja1986
Matt2 what is wrong with you... are you wanting to be next Crusader ?

Are you interested in GPU or your just love with Nvidia ?

What the hell do you mean what is wrong with me?

I'm in love with nvidia because I think someone running a 5.2GHZ C2E and a super cooled R600 3DMock05 run is useless?

If it makes you feel better I think the WR for the 8800u is equally useless and stupid.

Unless you guys plan on playing Crysis and Alan Wake with one hand while continuously dropping dry ice into tube, then that WR should be useless to you too.

I dont know, if not jumping AMD's nuts makes me a fanboy, then color me green.

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU ?

This is a Video forum... you know when nvidia release a new GPU we talk about the dude who overclocks it to stupid crazy speed to achieve wacky score. We do that because we are GPU enthusiastic not a idiot gaming joe that get his info from gamespot gpu reviews.

YOU are what's wrong with me.

I just stated my opinion that someone using a 5.2GHZ C2E and an effing liquid nitrogened R600 was useless to 99% of gamers in the world and you singled me out and called me a fanboy.

YOU are the last person on this board who should call anyone a fanboy.