- Aug 15, 2000
- 52,763
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Pooteh
because its your duty to patronize the inferior.:Q
![]()
Sue me
Originally posted by: Pooteh
because its your duty to patronize the inferior.:Q
![]()
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
why can they hvae the BET awards when no awards exist for ONLY whites? what about the latin grammys? what about the cracker grammys?? i understand that the grammys are probably dominated by whites anyways....but what if we shun all non-whites? wouldn't it be racist?
Originally posted by: roncarter
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Why is it that B.E.T. exists and no White Entertainment Television exists because it's racist??
Why is it that Black History Month exists, but no White History Month exists because it's racist??
Why is it that there's so much black pride existing and acceptable, but no white pride existing because it's racist??
Now, I'm when I say "white pride," I'm not talking about anti-black. When I say White Entertainment, I'm not talking about anti-black. If other races can get away with having anti-everything-else, why are whites accused of being racist if they do the same thing??
Honestly, it's just a simple question. I'm not trying to start anything. What would you think if such white "services" existed?
Im not white, but I ask the same exact questions that you do. I really think its a bunch of bull cr@p when blacks start saying that EVERYTHING is RACIST!! I HATE IT!! They need to get over it
Originally posted by: kh3443
You don't hear asians in particular be complain about why this and why that. Asians have been minorities since back in the days. And still struggling to fit in the melting pot. So stop whining and be a bigger white guy. Theres too much divisions in our society, we don't need more.
Uh...not really. Sure, they legally had rights, but that didn't suddenly transform them into equal citizens in the eyes of the majority. Society continued to marginalize them anyway, so they created stuff like BET that was by them and for them since that was the only way it was going to happen. If you'd bothered to read everything I posted instead of just calling a single line "bullsh*t" you'd see that I went on to posit that this kind of mentality is slowly giving way to a more normal "integrated society" mindset. I also detailed an example of this shift in thinking a synopsis of a recent local election. If you're going to start such a broad-reaching thread, it would be nice if you would actually compose a few real responses instead of just giving props to those who agree with you and calling the rest BS. I put a lot of thought into my resposes and I feel an equal respose on your behalf is warranted. Fair enough?Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
I think the biggest issue regarding the things you listed are that one group is a minority (who up until very recently did not posess the same rights as the majority).
That's bigger bullsh|t than race-specific entertainment. Blacks have had "white rights" if that's what you wish to call them for decades.
nik
Originally posted by: bGIveNs33
What about slave reparations? Does anyone think african-americans should get those? And if I'm from Africa, but caucasian, do I still qualify as an African-American?
-Billy
Originally posted by: iamme
In the end, I think it's just people are scared to say anything. They're scared of being called a racist.
IMO, a high percentage of black entertainers are EXTREMEMLY racist, but can get away with it. How many millions of times has a black comic started a joke with, "You know when white people...." or "White people don't understand....." People are too scared to call Chris Rock a racist or Eddie Murphy a racist or Bernie Mac a racist. All of them have impersonated a white person in a mocking tone. They all do the "white" voice.
Originally posted by: syzygy
there are whole cable channels devoted to different ethnicities and their specific interests . . . arabic, chinese, korean, british, greek, spanish, indian . . .. so why not american black ?
just because their american, does not mean they don't possesse a distinct history apart from the anglo-saxon mainstream. in
fact, they do, obviously. their perspectives vary. their sympathies are placed differently. american blacks have developed a unique
cultural identity that they do not expect the majority to understand - whether that majority be caucasian, indian, chinese, arabic,
or whoever - and can host their own channel to express this specific cultural view.
Hey we might not have channels but we have Programs that depict the average white family like "All in the Family", the "King of Queens" and "Everybody loves Raymond" not to mention the "Drew Carrey Show"Again, that's not my point. My point is that anything that's WHITE or similar that replicates BET or something similar gets bashed because it's racist when the blacks get away with it.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey we might not have channels but we have Programs that depict the average white family like "All in the Family", the "King of Queens" and "Everybody loves Raymond" not to mention the "Drew Carrey Show"Again, that's not my point. My point is that anything that's WHITE or similar that replicates BET or something similar gets bashed because it's racist when the blacks get away with it.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
They do?and blacks bitch about them being racist
Originally posted by: mpitts
White Entertainment Television does exist.
It's called TNN.
Because, in all reality, most television is aimed at the white community. I'm not saying that black people only watch BET, but the majority of people watching ABC, CBS, NBC, etc., are white.Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Why is it that B.E.T. exists and no White Entertainment Television exists because it's racist??
Why is it that Black History Month exists, but no White History Month exists because it's racist??
Why is it that there's so much black pride existing and acceptable, but no white pride existing because it's racist??
Now, I'm when I say "white pride," I'm not talking about anti-black. When I say White Entertainment, I'm not talking about anti-black. If other races can get away with having anti-everything-else, why are whites accused of being racist if they do the same thing??
Honestly, it's just a simple question. I'm not trying to start anything. What would you think if such white "services" existed?
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Why do shows HAVE to be geared toward ANY race? It just causes separation. If you want to watch white-only television, ya got problems. If ya wanna watch black-only television, you got problems.
nik
Originally posted by: joinT
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Why do shows HAVE to be geared toward ANY race? It just causes separation. If you want to watch white-only television, ya got problems. If ya wanna watch black-only television, you got problems.
nik
Wow, Nik I think that's the FIRST post you've ever made that I can completely agree with. Bout time![]()
just because high school history ignores pretty much everything that happened doesn't mean nothing happened outside of europe ever. but thats the impression you'd come away with reading a so-called world history book in high school. empires rise and fall in africa and asia and they're not mentioned. china is a superpower for millenia and you might get some mention of a few dynastys. heck, europe is largely ignored during the industrial revolution (your point) after its pointed out that england started it and some americans did some industrial espionage and brought the tech here. don't hear much about europe after that, except for a small blurb about napoleon taking over europe for a short while and selling louisiana, until the arms race between england and germany in the early 1900s. no mention of 1920s europe, a little bit about hitler's rise to power, then boom, WWII and then the cold war.Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: ElFenix
history in schools is usually the story of a bunch of white people. its eurocentric up until about 1815 (gotta get napoleon in) then switches over to a patriotic hit parade. then they talk about a few notable black people, usually ending the lesson with MLK/1960s things at the very end of the year. but you don't get things like the cultural revolutions of harlem and jazz or things like that.
Are you serious? This is just laughable. I hear this alot about how there needs to be more blacks taught in history class. Heck - let's just make some up! Let's face the facts. There is a LOT of history. People devote their lives to being historians and they are only experts in a small fraction of events that occured in the past. Schools need to choose to teach topics which are of importance. Important wars, people, and other events are what need to be taught. There simply aren't many blacks that had worldly important roles in the past. This is largely due to how blacks were suppressed in the past in many places. Why is there the "need" to add more blacks to history lessons? I want my child to learn how the world worked and why it is the way it is today in history class. I don't want him to learn fluffy history just because it involves more blacks. Which is more important? The development of Europe during the industrial revolution, or harlem and jazz turning big? Think about it. Try to look past color.
Originally posted by: SWirth86
White pride symbolizes KKK, aryan race, etc. It's going on the idea that the Caucasian race is superior to any other race. Black pride doesn't imply that the African/African-American race is better than everyone else, it just being proud of what you are.....for example, ffmcobalt, you're Proud to be an American, right? How is that any different from proud to be black? It isn't (for those of you not good w/ rhetorical questions). White Pride is a term that has a negative connotation on it.....and it always will.
