• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Quick Photo Shoot at the Beach

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Not enough fill flash. Work on your lighting. Consider a CFL-based umbrella setup behind a soft white diffusing cloth. Connect to your wireless lens trigger and voila.
 
zeze said:
avatar289736_4.gif
Click to expand...

yeah i got rocks too buddy!
 
Numenorean said:
The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.
Click to expand...

Yes it is, but jesus, the real beast is the Tamron. Performs just as well as L, but a third of the cost.
 
Zeze said:
Yes it is, but jesus, the real beast is the Tamron. Performs just as well as L, but a third of the cost.
Click to expand...

I've owned a non-Canon lens once. That was enough.

The ones that really bother me are the ones with the zoom in/out reversed.
 
Numenorean said:
I've owned a non-Canon lens once. That was enough.

The ones that really bother me are the ones with the zoom in/out reversed.
Click to expand...

I understand. But don't let one crappy generic lens scare you away from everything else.

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 is actually widely touted as a spectacular lens, especially from POTN Canon photography forum. I listened to them and they were 100% right.

Check out the amazing reviews, the real samples, & price.

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-17-50mm...6746617&sr=8-1
 
Zeze said:
I understand. But don't let one crappy generic lens scare you away from everything else.

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 is actually widely touted as a spectacular lens, especially from POTN Canon photography forum. I listened to them and they were 100% right.

Check out the amazing reviews, the real samples, & price.
Click to expand...

I have the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. Excellent lens. Unfortunately nothing similar to it for a FF camera.
 
brianmanahan said:
lol, camera nerds will defend their territory feircely.

peace out
Click to expand...

You god damn retard. I actually have a hobby that I'm passionate about. You see my GF pics in this very thread. I also wrestled in HS and am very fit.

Yes, I'm drawing the e-thug, better-than-you card. This 'nerd' will kick your ass. Now STFU before I take your worthless posts up your ass, you classic model internet troll. Pathetic.
 
Zeze said:
You god damn retard. I actually have a hobby that I'm passionate about. You see my GF pics in this very thread. I also wrestled in HS and am very fit.

Yes, I'm drawing the e-thug, better-than-you card. This 'nerd' will kick your ass. Now STFU before I take your worthless posts up your ass, you classic model internet troll. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

You are just proving his point. LOL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top