Quick Photo Shoot at the Beach

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
32
81
Not enough fill flash. Work on your lighting. Consider a CFL-based umbrella setup behind a soft white diffusing cloth. Connect to your wireless lens trigger and voila.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,395
5,842
136
avatar289736_4.gif

yeah i got rocks too buddy!
 

Numenorean

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2008
4,442
1
0
This. My lens is a $500 tamron & $450 canon f1.8 85mm

The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.
 

Zeze

Lifer
Mar 4, 2011
11,395
1,178
126
The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.

Yes it is, but jesus, the real beast is the Tamron. Performs just as well as L, but a third of the cost.
 

Numenorean

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2008
4,442
1
0
Yes it is, but jesus, the real beast is the Tamron. Performs just as well as L, but a third of the cost.

I've owned a non-Canon lens once. That was enough.

The ones that really bother me are the ones with the zoom in/out reversed.
 

Zeze

Lifer
Mar 4, 2011
11,395
1,178
126
I've owned a non-Canon lens once. That was enough.

The ones that really bother me are the ones with the zoom in/out reversed.

I understand. But don't let one crappy generic lens scare you away from everything else.

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 is actually widely touted as a spectacular lens, especially from POTN Canon photography forum. I listened to them and they were 100% right.

Check out the amazing reviews, the real samples, & price.

http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-17-50mm...6746617&sr=8-1
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,528
908
126
Nice pics, I'd recommend some of the photography websites though for more professional and constructive criticism.
 

Eos

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2000
3,463
17
81
The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.

Seems like it would be too long when in front of a 1.6x crop sensor.
 

Eos

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2000
3,463
17
81
"YOU LOOK GREAT!!! ONE MORE SHOT, THEN LOOK THE OTHER WAY" :D caps
 

Numenorean

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2008
4,442
1
0
Seems like it would be too long when in front of a 1.6x crop sensor.

That's why you put it on a full frame camera. I like it equally well on both types. Even on my crop body I just use it when I can zoom with my feet.
 

Numenorean

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2008
4,442
1
0
I understand. But don't let one crappy generic lens scare you away from everything else.

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 is actually widely touted as a spectacular lens, especially from POTN Canon photography forum. I listened to them and they were 100% right.

Check out the amazing reviews, the real samples, & price.

I have the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. Excellent lens. Unfortunately nothing similar to it for a FF camera.
 

Zeze

Lifer
Mar 4, 2011
11,395
1,178
126
lol, camera nerds will defend their territory feircely.

peace out

You god damn retard. I actually have a hobby that I'm passionate about. You see my GF pics in this very thread. I also wrestled in HS and am very fit.

Yes, I'm drawing the e-thug, better-than-you card. This 'nerd' will kick your ass. Now STFU before I take your worthless posts up your ass, you classic model internet troll. Pathetic.
 

busydude

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2010
8,793
5
76
You god damn retard. I actually have a hobby that I'm passionate about. You see my GF pics in this very thread. I also wrestled in HS and am very fit.

Yes, I'm drawing the e-thug, better-than-you card. This 'nerd' will kick your ass. Now STFU before I take your worthless posts up your ass, you classic model internet troll. Pathetic.

You are just proving his point. LOL.