GTaudiophile
Lifer
- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 32
- 81
Not enough fill flash. Work on your lighting. Consider a CFL-based umbrella setup behind a soft white diffusing cloth. Connect to your wireless lens trigger and voila.
This. My lens is a $500 tamron & $450 canon f1.8 85mm
The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.
Yes it is, but jesus, the real beast is the Tamron. Performs just as well as L, but a third of the cost.
I've owned a non-Canon lens once. That was enough.
The ones that really bother me are the ones with the zoom in/out reversed.
Nice pics, I'd recommend some of the photography websites though for more professional and constructive criticism.
The 85mm 1.8 is a damn fine lens. I haven't spend the cash on the L version even though I'd love to. I did splurge for the 135L though for portraits.
Seems like it would be too long when in front of a 1.6x crop sensor.
Seems like it would be too long when in front of a 1.6x crop sensor.
I understand. But don't let one crappy generic lens scare you away from everything else.
Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 is actually widely touted as a spectacular lens, especially from POTN Canon photography forum. I listened to them and they were 100% right.
Check out the amazing reviews, the real samples, & price.
this thread has decsended to the 6th level of camera nerd
I think we've had enough of your utter crap posts in this thread.
lol, camera nerds will defend their territory feircely.
peace out
You god damn retard. I actually have a hobby that I'm passionate about. You see my GF pics in this very thread. I also wrestled in HS and am very fit.
Yes, I'm drawing the e-thug, better-than-you card. This 'nerd' will kick your ass. Now STFU before I take your worthless posts up your ass, you classic model internet troll. Pathetic.
Who the hell wears a dress to the beach?
lol, camera nerds will defend their territory feircely.
peace out
