- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
I know that when Overclocking, you can do more with 1 DIMM then with 2, and more with less ram as well (2x256 vs 2x512)
So what I'm trying to determine is, how much of a difference am I looking at when overclocking a 3700+ SD or a 3000+/3200+ Venice with 2x1024 instead of 2x512. I am currently building a new computer and I have yet to decide on how much RAM I am going to buy. I don't think I need 2 Gig right now, but I will probably some time soon. So lets say for instance I get a pretty good SD or Venice chip that I get cranked to something like 300x9 which would be an effective speed of 2.7 Ghz on 2x512 Dimms. How much less of an overclock can I expect if I decide to go with the 2x1024 Dimms instead??
Thanks
So what I'm trying to determine is, how much of a difference am I looking at when overclocking a 3700+ SD or a 3000+/3200+ Venice with 2x1024 instead of 2x512. I am currently building a new computer and I have yet to decide on how much RAM I am going to buy. I don't think I need 2 Gig right now, but I will probably some time soon. So lets say for instance I get a pretty good SD or Venice chip that I get cranked to something like 300x9 which would be an effective speed of 2.7 Ghz on 2x512 Dimms. How much less of an overclock can I expect if I decide to go with the 2x1024 Dimms instead??
Thanks
