• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Question regarding new ram for a 5900x build, differences in what seems like same ram

N

nurturedhate

Golden Member
Looking at ram kits for a new 5900x build and had a question I wasn't easily able to answer. What is the difference between these three kits outside of aesthetics.

F4-4000C16D-32GTRS

Are you a human?

www.newegg.com www.newegg.com

F4-4000C16D-32GVK

Are you a human?

www.newegg.com www.newegg.com

F4-4000C16D-32GTZR

Are you a human?

www.newegg.com www.newegg.com

There's aslo the Neo line as well. Outside of marketing/aesthetics/cost I cannot find a difference. What am I missing?

Also any suggestions welcomed.
 
Heya,

While their white paper timings may be the same, the difference is likely in the binning and how much headroom they have as well as potential ranking. The Zeo's are known to handle quite a lot and are sort of the defacto goto for Ryzen performance when pushing speed and timings. Ripjaws are good out of the box. I can't speak much to the royals. If you're not trying to get the top 1% difference, then go with what's the most affordable unless you're into aesthetics.

Very best,
 
Different models by same manufacture, look at each of your links and you can see that there are different features but they are like led or no led, bedazzled etc... timing wise they are similar. But as Mal said, they can each have different oc overheads - hence the price

i have ripjaws 4x 32gb 3200 in a Threadripper works great so far
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top