Originally posted by: DZip
I have a question for those that use this forum. Does all of the blaming, criticizing, fault finding, and name calling of Clinton, Bush, Democrats, Republicans, liberals, and conservatives bring us closer together as a country or stimulate more anger and hatred against those that do not share our views? I am just wondering about it because it seems that many people are getting more and more angered with anyone that disagrees with them.
This is America; we have a right to disagree. It seems that many of us have forgotten that while I may not agree with your views I should still show you respect. Our children do not know what respect for authority is when we continually show disrespect for our ministers, teachers, bosses, spouses, police, politicians, and children. What happened to the idea that "if you can't say anything good about a person, don't say anything"? We have become a society that makes decisions based on the less negatives rather than the most positives.
Actually, this is not "America", it is Cyberspace. Certainly the servers are in "America"(Florida IIRC), but us foreigners didn't have to check-in at customs or the INS to post here.
Anyway, I think it does a little of both, but I think in time it brings "most" of us together. Let me splain: When I first got on the Internet, various other forums, and AT I held some pretty entrenched Opinions on various matters. For quite awhile I remained staunchly rigid, but as other Opinions were exposed to me they had the affect of refining and softening some of my Opinions, not all though some remain fairly rigid or have grown more rigid. This is likely true of all, but the most close minded.
I think it's all the affect of social interaction. In Ancient times and even in Modern times various peoples have/do gather to discuss "issues". During these discussion a variety of opinions are expressed, opinions that many have never heard before or perhaps the reasoning behind those opinions has never been heard before. When this type of social interaction takes place, often the hearer suddenly realizes that what they "assumed" about certain types of people is false or not based on quite the reasoning that was assumed.
Case in point: When I was younger, I was raised in a fairly fundamentalist Christian manner. I was a Conservative, Unions were the devil, hated "Godless Communists", feared "Socialists"(Godless Communist Wannabes!), and believed many other things. That's not to say that I was "close-minded", because I wasn't, I just thought I knew what was Right/Wrong and what the thinking behind those who do Right/Wrong was. When I left home after high school grad, my education was about to begin.
I began meeting Liberals and "Socialists"! :Q I'm a curious one so I'd attempt to correct their faultyness(sp) through discussion.

Soon it became apparent that what I thought they thought was incorrect. Maybe I was just lucky, for they weren't jingoistic morons, but had very well reasoned arguements to support their opinions. At any rate, I soon had to accept that there actually was a legitimacy to the Liberal/"Socialist" point of view. This certainly doesn't nullify Conservative/"Capitalism", but what it did was point out that the need or cause of both (Liberal/"Socialist)/(Conservative/"Capitalism") is based on Reason and past experience. Not only are both sides legitimate, but their Legitimacy can be seen in the Society(ies) we live in today. We live in Mixed Pragmatic Societies, because of the need for a balance between the 2 schools of thought.