This is the updated result from Computerbase.de
Dunno how other sites are arriving at their avg/min, because UWP and DX12 doesn't work with FCAT or FRAPs.
PresentMon spits out a frame time log and it needs to be charted for accuracy.
970:
390:
A thick line indicates constant flip up and down of the frametime, thus the avg FPS will be in the middle of that flip, for frametime ms -> fps calculations.
Example, the 970 on a 60hz monitor flips between 18ms and 36ms. Avg of 27ms = 37 FPS.
The 390 on a 60hz monitor flips between 18 and 36ms as well, but spends most of it's time at 18ms. Thus the average is much less than (18+36)/2, probably closer to 20ms = 50 FPS.
Oh a 144hz monitor, the result is different.
The 970 spends more time at 22ms (45fps), but it dips below that to 14ms (above 60 fps), and to 28ms (35fps) and even 36ms (27fps) and even 52ms (19fps).
Basically its all over the place.
The 390 is ~avg 16ms on 144hz monitor, or ~60fps.
The point here is to becareful with avg/min charts because that's not how it's done anymore in DX12 for games that don't have built-in FCAT support.
---------------------------------
For interest, guess the avg fps for these GPUs.
380:
960:
Fury X:
980Ti:
^ For those who guessed it, the AVG of Fury X is ~62 FPS, while 980Ti is ~55 FPS. It is in-line with the results from GameGPU.Ru...
Dunno how other sites are arriving at their avg/min, because UWP and DX12 doesn't work with FCAT or FRAPs.
PresentMon spits out a frame time log and it needs to be charted for accuracy.
970:
390:
A thick line indicates constant flip up and down of the frametime, thus the avg FPS will be in the middle of that flip, for frametime ms -> fps calculations.
Example, the 970 on a 60hz monitor flips between 18ms and 36ms. Avg of 27ms = 37 FPS.
The 390 on a 60hz monitor flips between 18 and 36ms as well, but spends most of it's time at 18ms. Thus the average is much less than (18+36)/2, probably closer to 20ms = 50 FPS.
Oh a 144hz monitor, the result is different.
The 970 spends more time at 22ms (45fps), but it dips below that to 14ms (above 60 fps), and to 28ms (35fps) and even 36ms (27fps) and even 52ms (19fps).
Basically its all over the place.
The 390 is ~avg 16ms on 144hz monitor, or ~60fps.
The point here is to becareful with avg/min charts because that's not how it's done anymore in DX12 for games that don't have built-in FCAT support.
---------------------------------
For interest, guess the avg fps for these GPUs.
380:
960:
Fury X:
980Ti:
^ For those who guessed it, the AVG of Fury X is ~62 FPS, while 980Ti is ~55 FPS. It is in-line with the results from GameGPU.Ru...
Last edited:
Facebook
Twitter