• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread

Page 187 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
A lot of people got burned by netbooks when Intel licensed an Imagination GPU for a bunch of Atoms, then promptly abandoned all driver support for it. Then, when it came time to upgrade Windows XP, they never supplied an accelerated driver, leaving it only able to run the compatibility one.
Ooooof ye, that would do it.
 
 
Even has a die shot:

 
Interesting that AMD could not get 8533 working, had to downclock it to 8000
Pretty sure AMD shipped 8533 Stx/krk platforms already.
Qualcomm too, with previous version of Snapdragon.
They didn't, they shipped 7500 at 7446 exactly.
And now, all of the sudden, they can reach ~9600?
Yeah that's normal.
All of the sudden Venice goes from 6400 of Turin to 12800 of Venice. magick!
 
Yeah, it’s very good platform. Panther lake won’t even come close to this and Nova lake isn’t till late 2026.
 
Pretty sure AMD shipped 8533 Stx/krk platforms already.

Nice, I haven't seen those yet.
They didn't, they shipped 7500 at 7446 exactly.

Ok. BTW, what was the original claim of previous version of Snapdragon? Wasn't it higher than that?

Yeah that's normal.
All of the sudden Venice goes from 6400 of Turin to 12800 of Venice. magick!

That's different, they are doubling the data rate as opposed to increasing the speed. But 6400 is nice for Venice.
 
Back
Top