Putting my ancestry into temporal perspective.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

PsiStar

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2005
1,184
0
76
I could not get my daughters interested in the DAR.

Both sides of my family have been traced back to 1790 ... the 1st US census. Father's side was at the confluence of the Ohio & Monongahela Rivers which was a common gathering area to get ready to float down the Ohio to go west. There is speculation that my father's side came over as indentured servants. My mother's side had a name change in Kentucky in the early 1800s ... something about a shot gun wedding and a shootin'!
 

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,942
190
106
We can trace our family back to a drunk who died from being kicked by a mule. His wife remarried and changed her kids last names. Before that it gets a bit sketchy.

lol

Is it right to root up some hint of a royal lineage in our ancestries and point to that person as an important progenitor? I would think that the disreputable bastards in the family tree probably figure more prominently when it comes to actual genetic contribution. Even Britain's royal family is littered with commoners - from what I read.
 

dennilfloss

Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
Oct 21, 1999
30,509
12
0
dennilfloss.blogspot.com
With regard to coming to North America, my family immigrated to New France and arrived in Québec City on June 18th, 1665 and we're still there. That ancestor only survived 4 years on the new continent but that was long enough to have a child who lived to the ripe old age of 63 and from which we all come. :)

http://www.laferriere.us/Hold/HusbandAntoine Filion 1636.htm
 
Last edited:

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
5
61

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
My family has records going back to St. Thomas Aquinas and further on my Mother's side.