Putin scoffs at Bush

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
"Of course, Saddam Hussein ought to have been hanged for destroying several Shiite villages," Putin said from Moscow. "And the incumbent Georgian leaders who razed 10 Ossetian villages at once, who ran over elderly people and children with tanks, who burned civilians alive in their sheds - these leaders must be taken under protection."

He also criticized the United States for flying 2,000 Georgian troops home from Iraq aboard U.S. military aircraft. "It is a shame that some of our partners are not helping us but, essentially, are hindering us," Putin said

Seems like Iraq has pretty much shot the image of the US being a "moral" upstanding country.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/...orld/story/441629.html

 

idiotekniQues

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2007
2,572
0
76
putin has a point.

bush be scumbag so can he so fuck off.

it would be funny if it weren't so true.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
I'll repost my reply from another thread:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Sadly, GWB, Cheney, and Rice have no moral standing to use against Putin. And Russia is going big enough to crush all opposition. We can only wait to see how this will play out in the UN.
Georgia is likely going to have to play for for some time to rally support.
Kinda shows that no countries have any real moral standing, doesn't it? It's why using moral relativism as an argument is always lame.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'll repost my reply from another thread:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Sadly, GWB, Cheney, and Rice have no moral standing to use against Putin. And Russia is going big enough to crush all opposition. We can only wait to see how this will play out in the UN.
Georgia is likely going to have to play for for some time to rally support.
Kinda shows that no countries have any real moral standing, doesn't it? It's why using moral relativism as an argument is always lame.

That's not an excuse to try to make our standing as immoral as possible.

You know, what with us being the world's policeman and all.

:roll:
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
I love people's "Hey, we did something stupid, so its OK for everyone to!"

War is never good, and always has unintended larger consequences. The small-mindedness and childishness never ceases to amaze me. But hey, it is the internet, I dont know why im surprised.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'll repost my reply from another thread:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Sadly, GWB, Cheney, and Rice have no moral standing to use against Putin. And Russia is going big enough to crush all opposition. We can only wait to see how this will play out in the UN.
Georgia is likely going to have to play for for some time to rally support.
Kinda shows that no countries have any real moral standing, doesn't it? It's why using moral relativism as an argument is always lame.

That's not an excuse to try to make our standing as immoral as possible.

You know, what with us being the world's policeman and all.

:roll:
Apparently it's an excuse for people to act like partisan tools in this country though. Always has been.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'll repost my reply from another thread:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Sadly, GWB, Cheney, and Rice have no moral standing to use against Putin. And Russia is going big enough to crush all opposition. We can only wait to see how this will play out in the UN.
Georgia is likely going to have to play for for some time to rally support.
Kinda shows that no countries have any real moral standing, doesn't it? It's why using moral relativism as an argument is always lame.

That's not an excuse to try to make our standing as immoral as possible.

You know, what with us being the world's policeman and all.

:roll:
Apparently it's an excuse for people to act like partisan tools in this country though. Always has been.

I guess if my seeing our foreign and domestic policies being a disgrace and financially tragic makes me a partisan tool, then I am a partisan tool.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Georgia struck first.

They didn't expect Russia to actually protect their interests in Southern Ossetia.

They were wrong.

They got their asses handed to them.

Now they're crying for help from the international community, and calling for a "cease fire".

:laugh: Georgia bit off way more than they could chew. They should be thankful they didn't lose a larger chunk of their territory.
 

Buck Armstrong

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2004
2,015
1
0
Whether you agree with Russia's recent action or not, you must admit that Bush and Cheney are the LAST TWO FUCKING PEOPLE ON EARTH who should be preaching about invading sovereign nations, supporting separatist movements, and pontificating on what is and is not acceptable in the 21st century. If there are any Russians on this board, I would just like to say that Mr. Bush does not speak for me or any other American I know.

If there are any Georgians here, I'm very sorry for your troubles, but you need to understand that, right or wrong, you CANNOT win a war against Russia, and there is NOTHING the US can do to change that short of WWIII. Speaking only for myself, I am just not willing to leave my family and go fight WWIII over some tiny insignificant territory that has expressed its wish to leave Georgia. And if you wish to force the issue, I can tell honestly that NATO will not save you. So just let them go.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,949
10,289
136
I remember several UN sanctions against Iraq over their WMD programs, and an unfinished Gulf War I with the cease fire being violated.

Russia's claim to stop Georgia is legitimate. Their claim to take over and destroy Georgia is something entirely different.
 

Buck Armstrong

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2004
2,015
1
0
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Russia's claim to stop Georgia is legitimate. Their claim to take over and destroy Georgia is something entirely different.

I agree, but that's just one more reason why you don't poke the drunken, sleeping bear. He might not stop at just chasing you out of his cave. He might just eat your entire ass.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'll repost my reply from another thread:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Sadly, GWB, Cheney, and Rice have no moral standing to use against Putin. And Russia is going big enough to crush all opposition. We can only wait to see how this will play out in the UN.
Georgia is likely going to have to play for for some time to rally support.
Kinda shows that no countries have any real moral standing, doesn't it? It's why using moral relativism as an argument is always lame.

That's not an excuse to try to make our standing as immoral as possible.

You know, what with us being the world's policeman and all.

:roll:

Sinking as low as your enemies isn't acceptable? Surely you jest.
 

Linux23

Lifer
Apr 9, 2000
11,374
741
126
Originally posted by: Buck Armstrong
Whether you agree with Russia's recent action or not, you must admit that Bush and Cheney are the LAST TWO FUCKING PEOPLE ON EARTH who should be preaching about invading sovereign nations, supporting separatist movements, and pontificating on what is and is not acceptable in the 21st century. If there are any Russians on this board, I would just like to say that Mr. Bush does not speak for me or any other American I know.

If there are any Georgians here, I'm very sorry for your troubles, but you need to understand that, right or wrong, you CANNOT win a war against Russia, and there is NOTHING the US can do to change that short of WWIII. Speaking only for myself, I am just not willing to leave my family and go fight WWIII over some tiny insignificant territory that has expressed its wish to leave Georgia. And if you wish to force the issue, I can tell honestly that NATO will not save you. So just let them go.

what this guy said.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Buck Armstrong
Whether you agree with Russia's recent action or not, you must admit that Bush and Cheney are the LAST TWO FUCKING PEOPLE ON EARTH who should be preaching about invading sovereign nations, supporting separatist movements, and pontificating on what is and is not acceptable in the 21st century. If there are any Russians on this board, I would just like to say that Mr. Bush does not speak for me or any other American I know.

If there are any Georgians here, I'm very sorry for your troubles, but you need to understand that, right or wrong, you CANNOT win a war against Russia, and there is NOTHING the US can do to change that short of WWIII. Speaking only for myself, I am just not willing to leave my family and go fight WWIII over some tiny insignificant territory that has expressed its wish to leave Georgia. And if you wish to force the issue, I can tell honestly that NATO will not save you. So just let them go.

They've been trying to leave for like 90 years now. It's like Georgia just doesn't get it.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Putin can suck my cock.

Right after he's done jizzing our Bush.

I think he prefers young boys.

Nah, he's already got a boyfriend.
Damn, don't show those to the Saudi king, he will be very jealous!

Russia is definitely no angel, but I agree Fvck face, aka George sh*t for brains has no credibility here whatsoever, mister let's go and annialate a country and a couple hundred thousand Iraqis while we're at it and oh snap I guess they didn't have WMD afterall.

 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Buck Armstrong
Whether you agree with Russia's recent action or not, you must admit that Bush and Cheney are the LAST TWO FUCKING PEOPLE ON EARTH who should be preaching about invading sovereign nations, supporting separatist movements, and pontificating on what is and is not acceptable in the 21st century. If there are any Russians on this board, I would just like to say that Mr. Bush does not speak for me or any other American I know.

If there are any Georgians here, I'm very sorry for your troubles, but you need to understand that, right or wrong, you CANNOT win a war against Russia, and there is NOTHING the US can do to change that short of WWIII. Speaking only for myself, I am just not willing to leave my family and go fight WWIII over some tiny insignificant territory that has expressed its wish to leave Georgia. And if you wish to force the issue, I can tell honestly that NATO will not save you. So just let them go.

From what I know on this issue I'm in total agreement with you on all points.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Georgia struck first.

They didn't expect Russia to actually protect their interests in Southern Ossetia.

They were wrong.

They got their asses handed to them.

Now they're crying for help from the international community, and calling for a "cease fire".

:laugh: Georgia bit off way more than they could chew. They should be thankful they didn't lose a larger chunk of their territory.

Ding ding ding. The only issue is that Georgia is aligned with the U.S. so we won't do anything other than the obligatory "bad russia, bad!"

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Sadly for the people of Georgia, its somewhat Western meddling in the region that have them in this mess. Nor do I solely blame GWB&co.

But unlucky Georgia and unlucky Chennia, their terroritory lies on must have routes for Russian piplelines, in my mind, this South Odessia thing is more pretence than real. But the Geogian threat to join Nato was bound to be perceived as a huge threat by Russia, and unless Nato is prepared to go to war over it, it was dangerous to even encourage its leaders.

And now its the people of Georgia who are paying the human price of war, its their infrastructure that is being destroyed, its their lives and families that pay the price, while those Nato leaders who encourged the threat will emerge unscathed. Somewhat someone
elses pawn invested, nothing gained.

In a longer term, the Russians will have their own prices to pay as the seeds of a thriving resistance movement are being planted. While Russia may have to get really totally brutal to even come close to the century and a half of hatreds they have truly earned in Chechnia, what is being done today will ripple over a very long time period.

Somewhat of a question of trust will lie in the future, will Russia, having whipped a small man and covered its leaders in mission accomplished, be content to just reassert control, or will they have the long term vision to rebuild even better on what they destroyed?
 

MaxisOne

Senior member
May 14, 2004
727
7
81
I think the ultimate poke in the face of the US Administration was that they could not get ANYTHING DONE in regards to de escalating this conflict. Then out of nowhere French president Sarkozy flies over there (in the official Capacity of EU president) and Bam ... Cease fire proceedings are afoot.

Seriously, WTF is going on here?.. Gordon Brown , David Milliband, Condoleezza Rice , George Bush ?? What?? ... have you people spent ALL your clout and influence ? or decided to sit there, wring your hands and pollute the place with stupid Rhetoric and verbal diarrhea expecting Russia to stop on your say so without investing any work into it? Is it me ? or am i interpreting this as France and to a smaller extent the EU getting more clout and influence simply due to the fact that the US and UK have totally maxed out their influence credit with Russia due to their pig headed need to invade Iraq fiasco ?