- Jul 11, 2001
- 37,511
- 8,103
- 136
Maybe I did misunderstand. My impression from what I've been reading (principally in these forums) the last few days, from a post or two I guess, was that Display Port was available on some 43" models but not on any 40" models. 40" models disappearing does not mean I can't get one or two presently. There's the Avera, there is at least one Samsung model (NU7100). Myself, I could probably fit a 43", just not sure I need, would benefit from or wouldn't suffer from the extra 3". I only said I'd consider a 43" based on my impression that Display Port meant no 40", only 43" and up. It's only because of the Display Port that I would consider a 43" model. What am I missing here?You misunderstood. The 40" TV's are disappearing. The smallest is 43" now which is really too big for a PC monitor.
I would prefer a 38" 4k@144hz @ Chroma 4:4:4 with a Display port.....I'll hold my breath.
BTW, I'm seeing posts from people using monitors larger than 43" for computer monitors. Doesn't mean I want one, but it makes me wonder. Obviously, they are not maximizing their windows when computing!