• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Info PSA- Public impeachments start today- UPDATE 2/5/2020- Trump wins.

Page 47 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So the DOD liaison testifying now updated her earlier deposition to include 2 new emails her staff shared from July 25—both indicate that Ukraine *may* have been aware aid was on hold on the day of the infamous Trump-Zelensky call (but she cannot confirm since Ukraine didn’t mention it.)
 
Why isn't there some challenge to Nunes overt lying in his statements, e.g. that somehow the IG modified the form to change a first-hand knowledge requirement after the complaint was submitted? Not that it was ever actually required or that the whistleblower didn't have any first-hand knowledge either....
 
I STILL find it very odd how and why Donald Trump has soooooo many soviet foreigners connected to Trump and surrounding Trump AND..... why Rudy Giuliani spends SO MUCH TIME dealing with those Soviet operatives ???
WHAT THE HELL IS UP WITH THAT ???

This entire Donald Trump/Soviet Union thing sounds like some spy novel or a plot from an 007 movie.
Or one of Tom Cruse's MISSION IMPOSSIBLE films.

And ALWAYS REMEMBER, while republican s CRY FOUL over this scandal, republicans and Donald Trump ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to let people testify or..... refuse to release documents to the impeachment committee.
SO WHY IS THIS ????

Because....
UNDER OATH, witnesses MUST TELL THE TRUTH.
So in Donald Trump's brain, if witnesses are blocked then no truth will come out. And, no one will need lie.

This impeachment process IS GOING TO HAPPEN. HAS BEEN HAPPENING. So why block witnesses from appearing as if doing THAT will somehow pull the plug on impeachment process ever happening?
DUH REPUBLICANS,,,, IMPEACHMENT IS HAPPENING, REGARDLESS, so why deny witnesses from appearing?
Could the only answer be.... dead men tell no lies. And witnesses not witnessing need tell no lies.
THIS ALONE should be more than enough to fully impeach Donald Trump. PERIOD !!!!!
 
pete6032 said:
Holy shit guys this is our president. Watch the video.

"He said I was not in a good mood. I'm ALWAYS in a good mood, I don't know what that is..."
"I don't know him very well, I have not spoken to him much"
"He was with other candidates, he actually supported other candidates, not me, came in late."
Click to expand...

"I want nothing, I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo!"

Man, if Trump testifies it will be insane.
 
UNCjigga said:
He’s a fucking Mad Eye Moody with TWO mad eyes!
Click to expand...

you know...that's the exact response I got when I said this LAST NIGHT.

I was like, who the fuck is that? what are you goons talking about?

They look at me like I'm an idiot or something. Tell me it's Harry Potter.

God damn nerds. 😀
 
Napolitano on Sondland- notice the source-

www.breitbart.com

FNC’s Napolitano: Sondland Is the 'John Dean' of Impeachment Inquiry -- 'Devastating' for Trump

During Wednesday's broadcast of Fox Business Network's special coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry, Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano discussed the testimony of EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, which he described as “devastating” for President Donald Trump. |...
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

He said much the same on Fox. The truth has a way of slipping in...
 
brycejones said:
Man our conservative members have been awfully quiet today.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's the "they haven't received their talking points yet" reasoning you often see (sorry zinfamous!). It's that you really, really have to scrounge to have any kind of defense, and people who are even vaguely reasonable aren't going to bother. Even some of the people we tend to think of conservatives here are generally agreeing that this doesn't look good for Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top